@kartikb753 Let us know! MCP access to the core of the system of record is the bare minimum these days, IMHO. I use MCP in OpenLoc for everything from managing prompts to triggering projects to stats, i.e. more meta.
Full initial source code just dropped for the open, AI-native enterprise TMS!
Code and roadmap at https://t.co/imNh1IgTgy
This is a public beta, with lots of obvious features not built yet. We're already working on the next round: more file formats, CMS integrations, vendor management, portal... and more AI!
Want to shape the future? Teams in our Early Access Program get hands-on support and help decide what comes first on the way to General Availability. Apply at https://t.co/3N9iJLdkH1
Full initial source code just dropped for the open, AI-native enterprise TMS!
Code and roadmap at https://t.co/imNh1IgTgy
This is a public beta, with lots of obvious features not built yet. We're already working on the next round: more file formats, CMS integrations, vendor management, portal... and more AI!
Want to shape the future? Teams in our Early Access Program get hands-on support and help decide what comes first on the way to General Availability. Apply at https://t.co/3N9iJLdkH1
Why @modelfront is offering a free, #AI-native #TMS with CEO Adam Bittlingmayer 🎙️ Check out https://t.co/xM0gMFbXdB 📺 Listen in 🎧 on Apple Podcasts 👉https://t.co/TZIfmvcoKX and Spotify 👉https://t.co/zNMjv0EvfR.
@OpenLocTMS
OpenLoc is the open TMS built for AI.
Run raw MT at scale with no AI tax. Use any LLM, with context and RAG. Free integrations. System-wide MCP. Dashboards from chat. Run it yourself.
We’re giving it away for free. Source code on GitHub Oct 19 under the BSL 1.1 license.
https://t.co/3N9iJLdkH1
Introducing Griffin, the first model to pass the video Turing test.
48% of people who talked to it live thought it was a real human. Previous systems have had a pass rate <3%. It is #1 on NVIDIA's benchmark for full-duplex AI video.
It’s the first Human Interaction Model (HIM).
Translation AI is now featured at @Techweek_!
Join us on October 8th in downtown SF to hear from translation AI builders and localization teams from @Google, @Microsoft, @DeepLcom, @Meta, @modelfront and more!
#TechWeek, the world's largest decentralized tech gathering, brings together 100K+ attendees.
The #SFTechWeek translation AI event is organized by ModelFront and hosted by @Adobe.
Get on the guest list at https://t.co/P9ijRxUBTX
@Valen10Francois Intelligibility is basically always asymmetric, because it’s just so rare that the soft power balance is perfectly symmetric.
If it’s mutual, it just means that they both speak the same language.
In my view we have a few different tiers of verifiability
1) programatically verifiable (near-free)
- games, coding, math, cybersecurity, chip design
2) real-world verifiable (cost-or time bounded)
- sciences: biology, chemistry, physics
-physical world: material science, energy, aerospace, robotics, agriculture, pharma
-forecasting: trading, weather
3) verifiable with human preference
- writing, design, comedy, charisma, persuasion
I expect most low-hanging fruit in (1) to be solved very quickly. Not sure how much longer before more solved math conjectures are simply uninteresting. I’m least certain about chip design being in this category, perhaps we hit a ceiling and require physics or materials breakthroughs to continue progress.
My guess is we will quickly run into the limits of how well we can simulate each domain in (2). The time-bounded nature of real world verification may be the reason we don’t hit fast takeoff. Sim2real remains an elusive problem to solve when real-world data is limited. Part of the reason I don’t expect to live multiple hundreds of years is simply that I expect pharmaceutical progress to be time-bounded by the physical world.
I expect the items in (3) to never really get solved to a superhuman degree, as success relies on an ever-shifting plane of cultural preference. People adapted to “good” AI writing and became annoyed at new stylistic tics that, in a vacuum, are not necessarily bad.
Unlimited mathematical proofs but limited skilled mathematicians who can verify them
Unlimited code but limited skilled programmers to review them
Unlimited videos but limited attention to watch them
Unlimited lawsuits but limited courts/judges/lawyers to adjudicate them
When the creation of something goes to zero, the cost moves elsewhere…
@_chenglou I was part of that team. Basically ChatGPT one year before it came out. Called LMChat and then another codename.
Google was too nervous to release it and DeepMind was blocked from shipping products that could disrupt Google.
I think about this a lot.
@pfau This is essentially what happened in translation, the original generative task. The logical next step is AI to do verification or flag for human intervention.