@DrBaleiaCrypto@BigJohn2310@whale_alert Had to look, it’s between 250-1000x depending on when they bought in year 2014 or 2015. If it really was before that they made even more.
@BigJohn2310@whale_alert Yeah they made a killing, coulda made more selling the top obviously but no doubt they made a killing. Probably lost/forgot keys for awhile.
@coug1988@endofracism@AdamParkhomenko How many people do you think ever turned down $10k much less $100k+ for a few hours of paperwork? Not needed, but absolutely wanted.
@MatthewHyland_ Didn’t expect that strong reversal wick all the way down to 18,400 but the overriding move played out quick! That strong of a reversal move along with S&P continuing up as the week opens leaves me extremely bullish for BTC atm. The correlation in direction is strong.
@MatthewHyland_ Looks like a local base for now at the bottom of the mini 19.5-20.6k range. Resolution to the upside seems imminent with 20.5 and 21.5k as the first and second targets. Retracement is likely to continue higher, much higher if we have no macro impediment and S&P closes gap at 42k
@CanDambell13 @politiwars@hodgetwins Some people don’t care about which political party another supports but only the truth in the message. It’s nice that you love it though.
@Arch3laos@CryptoWorldJosh Yeah I see in the short term we’ve rejected off the 100day MA a few times without a major move down yet but think it’s likely to happen. Note: we’re above the MA’s on CME. My thought Is a break down to 23k at least if not further before continuing up.
@CLyons202@SueAnneEliz@liberty_cyber@robbystarbuck Not trying to be antagonistic but that's what I'm waiting to hear. Some sort of evidence or compelling argument in support of that. My mind can be changed but so far I haven't heard anything.
@ZubyMusic Thank you for this post! It doesn’t need to recover, serious people understand the difference. Mainstream never realized it’s realistically the process of “proving” ourselves wrong.
in what is surely news to NO ONE
study finds that:
- anti-money laundering policy has less than 0.1% impact on financial crime
- compliance costs exceed recovered criminal funds by > 100x
- banks and taxpayers are penalized more than criminal enterprises
https://t.co/wCgGIX7x7h
@DFHobbs@ErikVoorhees This is not really about criminals. Their are all kinds of ways to still obfuscate funds. Understand who's really being attacked here. https://t.co/7dvghBf8dA
in what is surely news to NO ONE
study finds that:
- anti-money laundering policy has less than 0.1% impact on financial crime
- compliance costs exceed recovered criminal funds by > 100x
- banks and taxpayers are penalized more than criminal enterprises
https://t.co/wCgGIX7x7h
@Su_Musa15@MartinHonnold@ErikVoorhees Supposed to be. Ironically the government entities are now constantly bypassing the Constitution and breaking laws.
in what is surely news to NO ONE
study finds that:
- anti-money laundering policy has less than 0.1% impact on financial crime
- compliance costs exceed recovered criminal funds by > 100x
- banks and taxpayers are penalized more than criminal enterprises
https://t.co/wCgGIX7x7h