Slavery didn't disappear.... it's being ignored.
Millions of Africans are still being kidnapped, enslaved, trafficked, and sold by ISLAMIST militias...and much of the world remains silent.
Everyone is busy condemning Israel for defending herself from other ISLAMIST militias.
- @ScheibeFred
Sweden is lost.
A man in his 40s r*ped a 14 year old girl in a park in Stockholm.
Now the man has been set free by the court.
In the verdict, part of the reasoning by the court was that the girl could "just walk away".
I'm lost for words.
https://t.co/lXQY89ri4W
🚨BREAKING: The UK government is FRANTICALLY trying to get a court order to BLOCK migrant crime statistics from being publicised 🇬🇧
I wonder why they would do that 🤔
Hamas terrorist Ahmad Yahya Ibrahim who lead a group of Hamas terrorists who killed 16 Israelis from point blank range, in video
He changed his identity & become shopkeeper. Mossad was searching for him. He has now been deleted by IDF
Mossad never forget
Israel never forgive
Remember Hamas commander Anas Mahmoud Ahmed Hamdan, who hosted the disgusting handover ceremony of the Bibas family?
He was eliminated today by the IDF.
Good riddance.
🚨 SHOCKING DATA: Out of 50 MILLION Muslims living in Europe, 40 MILLION are on welfare & receiving social benefits.
Europe is spending billions every year supporting this massive dependency.
Is this sustainable? Or is it time for a serious policy change?
What do you think? 👇
#Europe #Welfare #Immigration #Muslim #EuropeCrisis #TaxpayerBurden #WakeUpEurope #MassMigration #CulturalClash #BorderSecurity #EuropeFirst
This is one of the smartest things I've read in a while. It is written the opposite of the way that I write.
I would say:
Most women in law are not able to understand the basics of justice.
Women, even women who are lawyers and judges, usually struggle with the difference between justice and nurture.
Men in law look at two opposing parties and judge the cases they present according to the rules of procedure.
Women in law look at two opposing parties and feel pity for the one they think is at a disadvantage (needs nurture). This makes them feel invested in a good outcome for the weaker party, or the "baby." (DESERVER)
Women also usually fail to see justice as a hostile contest between opposing points of view.
"We are not two separate parties; we are one big family, and we should all want everyone to be happy and safe! :)"
If a woman in law cannot transcend these family instincts, she violates the basic principle of "nemo iudex," meaning that no one should judge a case if they desire a specific outcome in that case. Instead of seeking justice, they will seek personal satisfaction (my baby won!).
She also violates "audi altereram partem," meaning that no one should be judged by someone who refuses to listen to their story (we've heard enough from PRIVILEGED WHITE MEN!).
You may recognize the absence of these principles in what we have been calling "cancel culture."
"Believe all women!" Remember that one?
That means "I want the woman to win" (DESERVER) and "don't listen to the man," all packed up into three neat little words!
Now, replace "woman" with "the party I feel bad for," and "man" with "the party I don't care about."
"I want the [DESERVER] to win! Don't listen to the [PRIVILEGE]!"
It should now be much more clear why the law has become increasingly lenient on criminals in recent years.
This is what I call "kindergarten mommy" consciousness, and it is severely corrosive to criminal justice. The courtroom is not a kindergarten or a family, it is a substitute for violent conflict between parties that absolutely do not consider each other family.
In other words, most women in law end up treating criminal justice proceedings like a fight between their own children.