BlueKoneko

Self Taught Artist creating KawaiiPunk artwork.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@JotaDeRodriguez @MrBeezul @3DanEder Weird things about the piece that don't make sense. Like random things in random places, or parts of things that look like they are trying to be something but failed. the ai generators usually try to copy and paste elements or things they think are elements.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@JotaDeRodriguez @MrBeezul @3DanEder you mean ai generated vs human made work? Usually if it lacks the correct number of fingers xD

[Alexandru @AlexandruP8]

@3DanEder Years of hard work and study just to be "replaced" by something that steals others people work. instead of evolving, we become lazy and devolved.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@heyorson @MightyJohanitor @3DanEder @ILMVFX @DisneyPlus currently, Ai generators are generating by stealing artists work from the web. They aren't using their own content base. It's a system based on art theft.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@NoblestNic @3DanEder Unfortunately, at the moment, Ai generators exist by stealing real artists work without their permission and using that as a base for it's generated art. It's a system based on art theft. It needs it's own database with work that wasn't stolen.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@Yotsuba07 @vintergron @3DanEder ai generators can't exist without original art from real artists. They scan artwork on the web without the permission of the artists and generate artwork based on those images. It is currently a system based on art theft. It needs it's own database with it's own images

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@Maestro_Pivetta @3DanEder the ai generators work by stealing artists work from the web. There needs to be a database of artwork that is within it's own system without copyright infringement. at the moment, it is just a generator based on art theft.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@socialkidmusic @3DanEder you are missing the whole point here. Ai art only exists by using real artists work without their permission. that is the main problem. Once Ai art uses it's own images in it's own system, then everything will be fine. but at the moment it is a system of theft

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@wtfwestworld @3DanEder you are really undermining the whole process of creation with this comment. Also, AI art only exists by scanning real artists work without their permission, so it cannot exist without original art from humans. Unfortunately at the moment, it is also a system of theft.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@3DanEder I see AI art being sold on places like inprnt and other sites that were meant to be communities of real artists. It's pretty sad. Those communities are suppose to help real artists, not make their life's work look like a joke for the already struggling artists communities.

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@zigmavisual2304 @3DanEder AI engines exist by scanning real artists work without their permission. It is an engine based on stealing. Once the program is sued and new laws are created, the engines will have to only generate based on images from their own storage bank and not from stolen web images

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@RedbubbleHelp I did on Nov. 10th. you never replied 🤔

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@MahinMuhammad4 @redbubble yeah, I can't get ahold of a human at all, figured their bot operated site must have backfired on them. I created an account and didn't even get to enter my name in the info field before it was suspended. :\

[BlueKoneko @BlueKoneko_]

@redbubble My newly created account was suspended and I cannot access it. I submitted an appeal and It was been almost two weeks and no replies or anything.