@AR0ttingCorpse Like they’re both sorta like projections, but also can tangibly affect things too. Though in the phantoms case they’re seemingly like- a weaker version of GF basically.
I wonder how they work then in that case, is it William like- making projections based off of the player’s-
@realberniebare Yeah I get you, for me I think Scott is really trying to tell us something with into the pit. I won’t go into what I think it is, but I think the game and and interactive novel have things that are ABSOLUTELY implying certain things about the games
@RedStickFigur3 it’s mainly due to the pushback from people calling the idea rediculous. We’re currently in the middle of a back and forth on the topic
@ellyssww_ How his father spoke to him through the plush.
So I do think Willplush did happen, but in fnaf 4 specifically I think it’s just CC imagining it.
@ellyssww_ I think what Scott might’ve been trying to imply is that the Fredbear plushes in CC’s home are real and were cameras set up by William, but most of the ones outside are just CCs imagination.
And I think most if not all of its dialogue is CC’s imagination, and he based it off of
@XSpranp Yeah this idea is valid too under that logic. You might see the very concept of that rediculous, but I see that as working in the wiggle room of what’s considered confirmed
@mii_tza But the equivalent isn’t that, it’d be that fnaf 2 being a prequel and William being purple guy isn’t absolutely CONFIRMED. Not that they aren’t those things period.
@circuscryptid@BenboiDa@sr_noir_dubs No, my logic here would mean is that it’s not confirmed that Micheal is the FFPS protagonist, It doesn’t mean he can’t be.