We Are Short $TROO
After a forensic review of SEC filings, Hong Kong court records, and TROO’s so-called “investments,” we believe this is a closed-loop shell trading on optics — not cash, not operations, not reality.
We see 80–90% downside as this story unravels.
FULL REPORT: https://t.co/TLXncWyy0v
To name a few: $LHAI, $ASTI, $AHMA, $SIDU.
These names didn’t drift down, they collapsed, and they did it fast.
BMF Reports isn’t fucking around in 2026.
This market is moving at violent speed, and we’re moving with it.
More targets. More pressure. More reports.
Stay tuned.
BMF Reports – Public Statement (2026 Update)
2026 has started strong for BMF Reports.
We’ve already completed a handful of investigations and drafted multiple reports this year, and frankly, the market has been moving faster than usual. In several cases, the decline in targeted names happened too quickly for us to publish on our preferred schedule. Not because the work wasn’t done, but because the opportunity window closed at warp speed.
It confirms what we’ve been saying: 2026 is shaping up to be a materially fast-moving year, and the dislocations are happening with less warning and more violence than most investors are prepared for.
Going forward, our priority is simple:
tighten timing accuracy without sacrificing investigative depth.
We remain extremely optimistic about 2026. The pipeline is active, the targets are real, and the market continues to reward truth faster than ever.
More to come.
— BMF Reports
$RGNX FDA issues Complete Response Letter rejecting RGX-121 gene therapy for Hunter syndrome, citing trial design concerns. Regenxbio plans to resubmit with additional data.
1. Yes
2. Assuming risk neutral, my answer would be yes. However a risk adverse decision maker might rationally decline. I believe the question is showing how human and models diverge. I have a 80% chance of losing .50 cents and a 20% chance to win $3.50, intuitively losing feels worse than winning, logically I only care about expected value. If I was offered many independent bets with this same structure I’d want exposure to all of them.
@MeadowsPoppa@stocktraderLuna This is a promoter for $TROO, you can see here this is the same message from 2 days ago, since than the user has changed its @.
We Are Short $TROO
After a forensic review of SEC filings, Hong Kong court records, and TROO’s so-called “investments,” we believe this is a closed-loop shell trading on optics — not cash, not operations, not reality.
We see 80–90% downside as this story unravels.
FULL REPORT: https://t.co/TLXncWyy0v
We Are Short $TROO
After a forensic review of SEC filings, Hong Kong court records, and TROO’s so-called “investments,” we believe this is a closed-loop shell trading on optics — not cash, not operations, not reality.
We see 80–90% downside as this story unravels.
FULL REPORT: https://t.co/TLXncWyy0v
$troo - besides @BmfReports fine report today, a few years ago @WolfpackReports exposed the co (under its previous name). Note many of the same crims exposed by Wolfpack are still involved with troo today. @StockJabber https://t.co/x1idyIhAcm
@BmfReports@WolfpackReports@StockJabber $Troo was hit with the $50 mm legal fine before the quarter ended, yet the co didn’t take ANY reserve /liability. Nice accounting!!!
This account fits the same pattern we’ve been seeing during our research on $TROO:
• New/low-credibility profiles
• Wild “+500%” promises
• “Long long long” pump language
These are coordinated Indian bot/scam accounts pushing buy-and-hold recommendations on $TROO.
@BmfReports This is indeed a smart short-selling suggestion. However, at this moment, I am more inclined to believe that this stock will attract investors and it will rise by more than 500%. Long Long Long