Bob Diggory

No to Digital ID’s and currencies. Cash is privacy. Protect our nature and countryside from development/pollution. #nofarmersnofood

[OffGuardian @OffGuardian0]

Theoretical trillionaire. He owns an asset that’s is theoretically worth that much. He can’t actually sell that asset for that much money, because the actor trying to sell instantly lowers the value.

It might not seem like it matters, but so much of our public discourse is based around entirely unreal things it’s important to point them out.

[Katherine@EyesOpen😎🔥🙏 @TheBeanEyesOpen]

@sainsburys - This is a HUGE error on your part.

We don’t wish to be monitored or recorded, thank you. We do not give permission for this.

Stop it. Hire more security.

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

1/ Today the Defence Secretary resigned because Starmer will not spend enough money on defence, which is quite something, because before we all start clapping like trained seals about tanks, missiles, Nato targets and which flag lapel pin everyone is wearing this week, there is a rather awkward question nobody in Westminster seems terribly keen to answer.

What exactly are we defending?

[Bob Diggory @BobDiggory]

@Jonno8279 That shit show won’t be receiving my energy

[Man About Mourne @ManAboutMourne]

Discussing the Belfast stabbing incident with my dad yesterday and whether or not it could have been entirely staged. He said, the man’s in hospital for God’s sake! I said, how do you know that for certain? He said, it said on the news he’d been taken to hospital and hospital

[Laura Perrins BL @LPerrins]

So-called gender-neutral language, inclusive language and the policing of pronouns are dangerous forms of compelled speech. Speech is how we express ideas. Authorities that compel speech therefore compel how we should think.
https://t.co/RNNzePjvED

[Winter Oak @WinterOakPress]

Absolutely. "Democracy" is a total lie. We are under occupation.

[Katherine@EyesOpen😎🔥🙏 @TheBeanEyesOpen]

This is all VERY interesting.

I don’t buy the ‘lack of budget’ story.

Something else has happened.

[Bob Diggory @BobDiggory]

@TheBeanEyesOpen Agreed. Losing a minister once is an accident, twice a coincidence and thrice is a pattern. In my opinion, there is a very serious reason for this pattern and it is not contained in the letters. What a shit show it all is!

[Sarah Says @sjn_thinks]

Very patronising 'news' reporter. The people have worked out the scam, and she's not liking it!

[Sarah Says @sjn_thinks]

My latest article discusses spotting fakes, and trust and truth. Link below.

[The Duran @TheDuranReal]

The Duran Daily
Twenty Strikes Inside Iran, Twenty-One Sanctions Packages

Free to Read on Substack
https://t.co/Y0PVaeePMK

[Galactic Zoo @TonyMarrese]

If I was a conspiracy theorist, I may pontificate that the devil would create events in society to turn people against one another, which in-turn would give them licence to lock up protestors and most importantly then CENSOR the internet. They may even stage some of these events to further their inverted agendas.
Luckily I’m not a conspiracy theorist, so I don’t believe that to be true.
#HenryNowak #Belfast

[Andy Bird @AndyBird125]

@daveatherton @LucyTCWife She didn’t, it was a blatant psyop and anyone with half a brain saw through it.

What genuine husband reacts like this.

Awful acting.

[The World Stage @ChaosfromOrder1]

The psyop deniers can easily see how much anger, hatred, division, voting intentions, protests, new laws, crackdowns etc they cause.
So the governments that locked them down and injected them all based on lies could not possibly be behind them of course. 🤔

[John Paul @Jonno8279]

He’s a front man for the worldwide cult’s agenda. Wakey wakey.

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

Iain Dale left stunned by calm caller on LBC

A composed caller named Mike told Iain Dale on LBC that Britain “will remain almost ungovernable until we have mass deportations”.

The exchange was striking because the caller spoke in measured tones, clearly articulating a view held by millions of people across the country. Yet Iain struggled to process it, repeatedly falling back on “you can’t do that”.

Mike highlighted the obvious disconnect: the British public have consistently voted for lower immigration, only for politicians to deliver record levels instead.

“There’s a massive disconnect between the political class and the people of this country,” he said. “We never gave any consent to this and there’s certainly no mandate for the scale of immigration we’ve seen.”

When Iain pushed back, saying you can’t deport people here perfectly legally, the caller was unflinching:

Caller: “You mean end indefinite leave to remain?”

Iain: “You can do that for future people but you can’t do that for people who have already got it. That would be outrageous.”

Caller: “Yeah you can. Of course you can.”

Iain: “From a fairness point of view, you can’t suddenly tell people who’ve got a perfect legal right to be here that we’re changing the rules now…”

Caller: “You can, Iain.”

Iain: “Well you can do that but is that really the kind of country you want to live in?”

Caller: “Yes!”

Iain continued to argue that you can’t “take it out on perfectly legal, law-abiding people”, clearly unable to grasp how widespread this frustration has become.

The public didn’t always feel this way. Years of politicians ignoring the public on immigration have shifted attitudes dramatically. As the caller made clear, people never voted for this transformation and the consequences of fixing it now rest with those who created the problem.

Well worth a listen. The gap between Westminster and the rest of the country has rarely been clearer.

[Phil B @p_brotherton]

To all of my fellow Englishmen.

I recently visited the site of the Battle of Towton, where on Palm Sunday in 1461, upwards of 20,000 Englishmen were killed in a single day during this pivotal battle of the Wars of the Roses.
Our ancestors were duty bound to fight & die for their Lords & their beliefs. But the Wars of the Roses were more than a mere feudal conflict, as both armies were swelled by hordes of free men who volunteered to fight & probably die for their chosen side.

It would appear that the trappings of modern life have taken away an Englishman's willingness to fight for what he believes in.
But as we will see our freedoms slowly (or quickly) stripped away by the arch Stalanist Starmer's regime, will we also see a return to a mindset amongst my fellow Englishmen that has laid dormant for over 300 years?

A willingness to do what's right, by fighting against a despotism that hasn't been seen in England since the dark days of Oliver Cromwell & King Charles II in the mid 17thC.
The punishment then for the common man was death, which is harsh compared to the current punishment, but yet, those Englishmen still stood up for what they believed in.

Are we actually that different to our forebears, in that we won't actually stand up & be counted when the time comes?
The blood of our ancestors runs in our veins. They wouldn't turn the other cheek & meekly surrender to despotism.

Who will stand?

[Bob Diggory @BobDiggory]

@A1an_M @JudeG2024 @leicesterliz I appreciate your tenacity Alan but you might as well be talking to the wall with people like her and her acolytes

[Karlos Fandango @KFandango108]

@MediaSOI They're probably learning and gathering data by monitoring what percentage of the population are thick & gullible enough to fall for all of the very obviously fake false flag psyops they keep staging...