Foolish Bob

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner What other context is there for the creation account?
Is it not true that what the bible says is that the world was created in 6 days?
That isn't out of context, you just don't think!

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner Those verses have crucial information that collecively claim the world was created in 144 hours, if taken literally.
The only options left from that are to accept the bible is wrong, or accept that you must slant what the bible says, but to what limit should the bible be slanted?

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner The only way your insults will mean anything is if you actually prove them with criticism.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner Genesis 1:5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31
If you believe what is written can't be taken at its word, where does this end? What's stopping me from saying nothing in the book can be taken at its word? At that point, it's practically like calling fanfics more canon than official material

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner I repeat, nothing of what I said is emotionally charged:
•genesis claims the world was created in 144 hours, we have proof that suggests the bible is wrong.
•Go out and *prove* that theory wrong.
•every slant on what claims are written is a slant on what it may prove.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@M0nsterFL @ewilde1988 @sqsehrish "divide by half" omits crucial information on what "half" is "half of":
500/([N/A]/2)+50
If we go off the first established subject of the sentence, it would be half of 500:
500/(500/2)+50=52

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@sqsehrish 52.
Half of 500 is 250, 500 "divided by half" is 2, 2 + 50 is 52

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner Also, what I said wasn't emotional in any way, it was my way of saying that what actually exists doesn't match the book, and if you believe your book, you'd test the scientific claims yourself to prove if they are factually wrong, and if you do, you can't twist the book's meaning

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner But sure, believe what you want about me, and believe what you want about the world you don't observe for facts.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@OldManVsCloud @sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner God allegedly created adam in one day, and he created eve in the same day out of one of adam's ribs.
According to imperical evidence, we know this isn't how humans came to exist or how long it took.
The walls don't match the blueprint you believe.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner Correction: pansemic, not omnisubjective.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@sj27426 @MidgetShemale @God_Questioner For starters, the bible gets our creation wrong, and you have no excuse to not believe in empirical evidence you have not observed.
If you believe that the bible's description on this isn't literal, just know an omnisubjective claim is just as bad as an exactly wrong one.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@tastiburger @frunsa I don't see any creative differences tho...

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@NicoRobin_XYZ Spider

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@geoffrey_r89603 @_iamlougotti Even if given phone service and a car, I'd hope you'd still choose to walk.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@AremasNL @Blaisemane73643 @Half_infected @_iamlougotti Corrections: trump negatively contributes, and killing is a negative contribution.
But given the hypothetical, killing would be to actively push him off, and while in a vacuum risking your life to save somebody is a positive contribution, it isn't necessarily a moral obligation.

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@Don_Crumlin @_iamlougotti There's a lot of choices to make, and a lot of things that need choices, and one of my close friends asks me, a good friend, he says, and I tell ya he's a good close friend, he says, are we gonna make any choices, and he's made some great choices...

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@w_sofie49 @meevowsfw It's no work.
It's ai

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@cuteonlyvibes NAOKI

[Foolish Bob @BobFoolish]

@N1trixOfficial @cloudoverpass Kasane teto is by origin a 31 year old who's gender is listed as "chimera".

Also most fictional characters don't have genes or relevant genitals, you're equally a groomer for being adament that teto's got a pussy and XX chromosomes.