Is there anything more overrated than the “shower beer” ??? I’ve tried it several times because some of you idiots swear by it. It’s dumb. Like drinking a beer when you’re working out. Dumb.
Breaking News: Amy Gertner, the wife of Graham Platner — the Democratic candidate for Senate in Maine — told his campaign in 2025 about sexual messages he sent to other women. https://t.co/0UefTX3dIS
Demis Hassabis wants to do something no civilization has ever been able to do.
Run reality more than once.
Hassabis: “AI itself will maybe unlock new sciences… the one I’m particularly excited about is AI for simulations.”
Every economy ever built. Every policy ever enacted. Every war ever fought.
Happened exactly once. Against the entire human population. With no way to run it again.
Hassabis: “If you raise interest rates by half a percent, you have to do it in the real world and then see what happens. You can have theories, but you can’t run it thousands of times.”
Every major decision in the history of civilization was a single experiment run on billions of people with no control group and no second attempt.
We called the results knowledge.
They were the scars of bets we were never allowed to place twice.
Hassabis: “Why aren’t they just sciences like physics today? Because the problem is they’re emergent systems… it’s very hard to do repeated controlled experiments.”
Physics became physics because you can drop a ball a thousand times and get the same answer.
You cannot drop a civilization and get any answer at all. You just get the wreckage and call it a lesson.
Hassabis wants to change that.
Hassabis: “If you could simulate things really accurately, then maybe there’s sort of new sciences to be done where you can rigorously sample from a very accurate simulator.”
Simulate an economy. Crash it. Rebuild it. Adjust the inputs. Run it again.
Do for civilization what the laboratory did for chemistry.
But that word “accurately” is doing more work than anyone is willing to examine.
To simulate a society well enough to learn from it, you have to simulate the people inside it.
Not averages. Not abstractions. Agents with preferences and fears and breaking points.
The more accurate the simulation gets, the less separates it from the thing it represents.
The line between physics and economics was never about the nature of what was being studied.
It was about the limits of the thing doing the studying.
Humans were never too complex to predict. We were too complex to calculate.
AI does not create new science. It collapses every science into one.
Everything computable becomes predictable. Everything predictable becomes simulable.
And past a certain resolution, the gap between a simulated world and a real one stops being a technical question.
It becomes a philosophical question no one is prepared to answer.
A simulation you can tell apart from reality is a simulation that has not finished improving.
The people inside a perfect one would not wonder whether their world was generated.
They would feel exactly the way you feel right now. Reading this. Certain they are real.
That certainty is not evidence. It is exactly what a successful simulation would produce.
Hassabis: “That will allow us to make much better decisions in these, today, what are very uncertain domains.”
What he is building is not a forecasting tool.
It is the quiet proof that “real” was only ever a word for what we had not yet learned to compute.
And that word is about to lose its meaning.
This Red Sox season is so bad, the best story of the season comes from a St Louis writer. But it’s worth the read. Hopefully Breslow didn’t give up a prospect to Chaim for it to get written