Bob Toe

Just a regular guy looking to speak his mind.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

It’s finally here!!!🚨

Clarkson’s Farm Season 5 trailer!🤩

What do you think?😎

[Marc Emery @MarcScottEmery]

Canadian affluent liberal women turned on Canadian men and boys about 35 years ago and it’s only worsened. Now boys and men are falling behind women because the system now panders to women while every institution is feminized to repress masculinity.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

WOW

Yesterday CTV and CBC ran wall to wall coverage claiming Russia and the US were interfering in the Alberta separatist movement.

Today the Globe and Mail reported:

The RCMP deputy commissioner told Alberta’s Public Safety Minister there is NO credible evidence of foreign interference in the Alberta separatist movement.

ZERO.

None

The RCMP’s own words.

The study CTV and CBC cited?

Produced by “DisinfoWatch” and “academic researchers.”

Not CSIS.

Not the RCMP

Not any law enforcement agency

This is the same CTV that called my verified content “Deception Decoded.”

The same CTV taking millions in government subsidies

A study nobody can verify

Cited as fact, to discredit 301,000 Albertans who signed a petition.

This is why people lose trust in MSM.

CTV & CBC are cut from the same cloth.

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

💔 The irreversible damage being done to our youth is beyond sad — it’s criminal.

Watch Faith Groleau, a brave detransitioner, lay it out:

“I was experimented on. I was not told they were experimental. I was told it was medicine and that it would help… It gave me complications the doctors ignored. I have a body that does not work.”

She was fast-tracked, cut up, and drugged as a child. Now she’s physically disabled with recurring hernias, collapsed lung issues, and a medical system that refuses to take responsibility.

This isn’t “care.”
This is medical experimentation on confused kids — cheered on by activists and politicians while evidence mounts that puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries cause lifelong harm, infertility, and regret.

The Cass Review, European countries pulling back, and exploding lawsuits prove it.
But in Canada, the Liberals keep pushing this ideology like it’s sacred.

We’re sacrificing an entire generation on the altar of woke feelings.

Protect the kids. Stop the mutilation.

Canada First 🇨🇦

#cdnpoli #Detransition #ProtectKids #GenderIdeology #WokeFail

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

**Liberals love blaming Trump for $1.90/litre gas…**

But here’s the inconvenient truth:

Oil hit **$100/barrel** under Stephen Harper — gas topped out at **$1.38/litre**.

Today? **$1.90/litre**… with oil at the same price.

That’s **52¢/litre** in Liberal taxes, carbon taxes, and taxes on taxes.

Same oil price.
Different government.
Different result.

🛑 STOP BLAMING TRUMP
Start blaming the tax-and-spend grift that’s crushing Canadians at the pump.

👇🏻

Canada First — not more Liberal gas taxes. 🔥🇨🇦

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

12 years ago. The same $100 oil price. But gas was 45¢ cheaper.

Why?

[Matt Alexander @RealMattA_]

Remember when Calgary Mayor, Naheed Nenshi, said anti-mask protesters were...

"Not people that need to eat"?

I do.

Don't forget how your leaders treated you, for thinking differently.

They haven't changed, since Covid.

Not at all.

LOST FREEDOM FILES # 5086

[The Canadian Independent @canindependent]

WATCH: For Canadians wondering why fruits and vegetables are so expensive, a U.S. government hearing yesterday reveals that the Canadian federal government has been restricting bulk imports of fresh U.S. produce.

[The Canadian Independent @canindependent]

BREAKING: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Lawsuit Over Teen Sean Hartman’s Death Following COVID-19 Vaccination.

In a significant decision released today, the Hartman v. Canada (Attorney General) ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal, dismissing a lawsuit brought against the federal government over the death of a teenage boy following a COVID-19 vaccination. The court found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and agreed with a lower court decision to strike it in its entirety.

The case was brought by Daniel Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, died in September 2021. Sean, who had been described as previously healthy, was found dead beside his bed 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Following the vaccination, he had been taken to hospital due to symptoms his father believes were related to the vaccine.

Sean’s father, Dan Hartman, says his son chose to get vaccinated so he could continue playing hockey, as vaccination was required for participation in many sports and activities at the time.

Hartman’s lawsuit alleged that federal officials, including the Minister of Health, were negligent in approving, promoting, and monitoring the vaccine, and that they acted with reckless indifference or wilful blindness to potential risks.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged the devastating nature of Sean Hartman’s death, describing it as a tragic loss for his family and community. However, the judges concluded that the legal claims could not succeed. Central to the ruling was the finding that the federal government does not owe a private duty of care to individual members of the public when making broad public health decisions during a pandemic. Instead, such decisions are made in the interest of the population as a whole, often requiring difficult trade-offs that may carry risks for some individuals.

The court also determined that the claim failed to establish the necessary elements for misfeasance in public office. Specifically, there were no material facts showing that government officials acted in bad faith or knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct that would likely cause harm to Sean Hartman. The judges noted that the clinical trial data referenced in the lawsuit supported the conclusion that the vaccine was highly effective, undermining the argument that officials knowingly promoted a harmful or ineffective product.

In addition, the court found that the public statements cited in the claim were directed broadly at Canadians and did not create a specific relationship or obligation toward Sean Hartman as an individual. As a result, there was no legal basis to establish the proximity or duty of care required for a negligence claim.

Shockingly, the court also claimed that allowing Hartman’s case to proceed could have broader consequences, including discouraging governments from making urgent public health decisions during emergencies due to fear of legal liability.

The Court of Appeal further upheld the lower court’s decision to deny leave to amend the claim, finding that the proposed changes would not have addressed the fundamental legal deficiencies. The judges emphasized that lawsuits must be based on clearly pleaded facts, not on the possibility that supporting evidence might emerge later.

Ultimately, the court concluded that while the circumstances surrounding Sean Hartman’s death are deeply tragic, the law does not support holding the federal government liable under the claims presented. The appeal was dismissed, bringing the case to a close, with no costs awarded to either side.

The Canadian Independent spoke with Dan Hartman by phone this evening. He said he is “seriously considering” taking the case to the Supreme Court and that he and his legal team will evaluate their next steps over the coming week. Hartman noted that the cost of taking the case to the Supreme Court could exceed $20,000. He added that he does not want to ask those who have already donated to his cause to contribute further but said, “What other option do I have?”

Dan believes the courts are not willing to find the government liable or hold it accountable, as doing so would amount to an admission of wrongdoing. He also argues that such a finding would make his larger lawsuit against Pfizer significantly easier to pursue.

If you want to donate to Dan’s legal fund, you can do so at the link in the comments section.

[Bob Toe @BobToe16]

@MarilynGladuSL This is a total betrayal! I cannot comprehend how this is legal or can be called democratic in any way. Shame. This is not what we VOTED for!

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Most of us think we’re setting boundaries… but we’re actually just making requests.

Dr. Becky Kennedy explains the crucial difference:

A real boundary isn’t telling someone else what to do.
It’s clearly stating what you will do if the behavior continues.

Example: Instead of repeatedly saying “turn off the TV” and getting ignored, a true boundary sounds like:
“If you haven’t turned it off by the time I get there, I’ll take the remote and shut it off myself.”

Same with jumping on the couch or an intrusive in-law showing up unannounced.
You stop hoping they’ll magically respect your words and instead take ownership of your own action.

It removes guilt, role confusion, and the constant power struggle — and gives kids (and adults) the sturdy leadership they actually need.

This one shift completely changed how I think about boundaries.

Have you ever realized you were making requests instead of setting real boundaries? How did things change when you switched?

[Juno News @junonewscom]

WOW

A Canadian Press reporter raises a freedom of expression argument over porn restrictions in libraries for those under 16.

"I'd be surprised if anyone in 1982 [thought] the Charter meant giving seven-year-olds access to pornography," said MLA Dan Williams.

[Danielle Smith @ABDanielleSmith]

Alberta parents want their kids focused on the basics at school. Our government is not backing down on this.

The NDP don’t agree and based upon the “equity card” meltdowns from their recent convention, one can see why…