1. Any reasonable Crown would conclude, in deciding whether to commence this prosecution, it didn't meet the standard to prosecute. Soon after the trial started, it would have been more obvious & that increased until the evidence concluded. Even then,...
https://t.co/zGG3BbskqD
The tough thing about holding your new uniforms for an unveiling is keeping all the third-party corporate partners in line with the launch, when there's so little oversight with those. Fanatics ad leaked through USA Today Network, appearing to show Lions' new look jerseys.
This was one of my favourite Sankoff Seminars.
I strongly recommend this particular seminar and subscribing to @ProfSankoffsCDE generally.
Remember that no matter how busy you are, you have to take some time out of your schedule to sharpen the tools in your toolbox.
If you can join me today, you should. The alternative (non joke) title to this is: "Suggestions about How to be a Better Criminal Defence Lawyer", things I've learned after almost 10 years doing appeals.
To be perfectly clear: I AM NOT looking for free labour and expect no research, errands, or perfect attendance from any students who might wish to observe.
Reminder to email or text, not DM, as I do not come on to this hellscape very often anymore.
Howdy #LawTwitter folks.
I have a pretty interesting manslaughter case in London from October 16th to 27th.
If any law students at Western or Fanshawe would like to observe, I invite them with open arms.
email me [email protected] or text me 519-792-9391.
My client is 3rd on the indictment, I'm 3rd in terms of counsel seniority, and we are aligned with co-accused on many issues, so I will be uniquely prepared to offer insight to students that would make this a more active learning experience than typical trial observation.
@P2WFantasy I prefer the TE and the QB you gave away tho my dynasty experience and therefore mindset is all S-flex.
In 1QB I can kinda see your angle.
Either way I'm team get your guys so well done and good luck.
@Andrew_Dowie @FabioCostante Conservative politics 101: declare that you raised an issue you didn't raise, then suggest that you missed the mark by raising said issue.