Bolshie Walshie

🌸Critical thinker #Nuremberg2 ⚖ #CrimesAgainstHumanity
#Agenda2030. #TwoTierKwier
Westminster overflowing cesspit. Member of Free Speech Union.

[Bolshie Walshie @BolshWalsh]

None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified).
#TwoTierBritain
#Agenda2030
#Corruption

[Crypto Tice @CryptoTice_]

BREAKING:

The EU is planning to require a passport to access the internet.

And they want to block VPNs to enforce it.

"The new age verification system cannot be bypassed via VPN."

Read that again.

A digital passport. For the internet.
Enforced by blocking the tools that protect your privacy.

This is what the trajectory looks like.
- Cash banned above €10,000.
- Bitcoin requires ID above €1,000.
- Privacy coins banned.
- MiCA eliminating 90% of crypto firms.

And now internet access tied to your identity.

With VPN circumvention specifically blocked.

Every layer of digital privacy.
Being dismantled one regulation at a time.

While America debates zero capital gains on Bitcoin.
Europe is building a system where every click, every transaction, every website visit.

Is tied to your passport.

This is not consumer protection.
This is digital authoritarianism.

And they're not hiding it anymore.

[Miss Jo @therealmissjo]

Two women are now dead because the police and courts did not do their job. Too busy chasing mean tweets to investigate actual murders and rapes…

This is Simon Levy.

He had been convicted of 13 sexual assaults since July 2018.

Yet he was still walking the streets of London in January 2025.

He then (allegedly) met a woman who said he jumped on her, broke her collarbone, strangled her and held her down while he raped her. She was left for dead. She managed to survive. The woman picked Levy out of a line-up.

A few months later, in April 2025, Levy was again connected to the murder of Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo. She had been found dead in the stairwell of an abandoned building in South London. Levy’s DNA was found at the scene and on her body. He was arrested at this point but released pending further investigation.

What were the police thinking?

Just a few months later, in August 2025, Levy met a third victim, Sheryl Wilkins in the same car park in which the first rape victim had been attacked. Sheryl’s body was found with 83 wounds on it and Levy’s DNA was all over her.

Sheryl would still be alive if the police had kept him in custody.

Sheryl and Carmenza would still be alive if he had actually received any meaningful sentence for the 13 sexual assaults committed in the previous 7 years!

[Benonwine @benonwine]

JUSTICE FOR 20-YEAR-OLD CODY HARPER!

He’s scheduled to appear at the Birmingham Magistrates’ Court on July 23rd on the false charges of assaulting a police officer.

He could be sentenced to around 6-12 months in prison if wrongfully convicted.

But here’s what they don’t want you to know:

Cody was viciously assaulted by a group of black men on Broad Street in Birmingham.

Instead of protecting the victim, West Midlands Police arrested him while his attackers fled the scene.

They initially tried to downplay it as a “fight”.

Thanks to the footage shared on X, they were forced to admit it was an assault on Cody and are now scrambling to investigate the real perpetrators who got away.

How can victims of crime be so easily arrested and persecuted in this country and criminals are allowed to get away and even treated as victims.

This is two-tier policing in plain sight.
White victim gets slammed, charged, and threatened with prison. I hope Cody has good legal representation and for heavens sake doesn’t plead Guilty that’s how they will win.

Why won’t the Home Secretary summon the Chief Constable to explain this disgrace?

Demand full bodycam and CCTV footage be released immediately.

Demand the charges against Cody are dropped.

Demand real justice.

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

IT HAS HAPPENED

Sweden has made the UN update their guidelines so that r*pe is now considered a serious crime that warrants deportation.

This comes after the shocking case in Sweden where a man from Eritrea was convicted of r*ping a 16 year old girl.

But the court said he couldn't be deported it wasn't considered a serious enough offence for deportation.

Of course this story was covered up by the media.

But it was reported on X and caused massive outrage in Sweden.

[Catherine Evans @ideallythissss]

How many people voting in the Makerfield by-election knew this? How many would have voted differently if Andy Burnham was transparent about his social media digital ID checks?

This was never about protecting young people and always about greater control, surveillance and censorship of the whole population.

#GeneralElectionNow

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Another little part of England is to be destroyed, as the government plans to put 1250 illegal migrants here, in the hamlet of Piddlington, grossly outnumbering its 400 residents.

This is operation scatter. Also known as destroy everything they cherish.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Labour Loaded the Gun the BMA Is Now Pointing at It

Consultants earning £152,000 a year, in the top two per cent of the country's earners, have voted to strike for £16,000 more and five fewer hours a week. The British Medical Association calls this justice. Most of the country will call it something else.

Start with the arithmetic the BMA would rather you skipped. The union wants parity with Wales, where the most senior consultants earn £166,585. It does not mention that its own junior doctor negotiators recommended a Welsh settlement well below full pay restoration when that comparison cut the other way. Wales is a benchmark when it flatters the claim and an irrelevance when it does not.

Then look at the sequence. Resident doctors settled their dispute weeks ago, on terms Labour hailed as proof that discipline and generosity could coexist. The specialist and associate specialist doctors balloted and fell short of the legal threshold, a rare moment when the medical profession's own members declined to follow the leadership over the top. Consultants cleared the bar easily. Each stage should have closed a chapter. Instead each stage opens the next one. A professional body seeking restoration settles and moves on. A body seeking confrontation treats every settlement as a springboard.

None of this happens by accident. Labour's Employment Rights Act 2025 doubled the strike mandate from six months to twelve. Consultants can now call action at ten days' notice for a full year. The government that wrote that rule is the government now living under it. Ministers handed the BMA a longer runway and are shocked to find it taking off.

Health Secretary James Murray is right that there is no serious case for these strikes. But rightness has not stopped previous ministers from folding. The train drivers' settlement of 2024 taught every public sector union a lesson that has never been unlearned: hold firm, cost the country billions, and eventually somebody in Whitehall will find the money rather than face the headlines. Nurses watched that deal. Teachers watched it. The BMA watched it most closely of all, and drew the obvious conclusion.

Patients drew a different lesson, because patients are the ones who pay for it. Waiting lists that do not fall. Operations rescheduled for the third time. A health service that treats industrial leverage as a permanent feature of its own management, rather than an emergency to be resolved and forgotten.

The BMA's leadership speaks the language of professional stewardship while behaving like the most militant wing of the trade union movement it now openly admires. That is its right. What should not be tolerated is a government too frightened of the noise to say plainly that a group already among the best paid in the public sector cannot simply demand more because a neighbouring nation pays more, and expect the taxpayer to close the gap on request.

There is a wider pattern here, and doctors are only the latest profession to fall into it. The same drift towards permanent grievance and institutional self-regard has been visible in policing, in parts of the civil service, in the Church of England and the BBC. A leadership class convinced of its own righteousness stops asking whether its members actually want a fight and simply assumes the fight on their behalf. The BMA did not put a thirty-five per cent improvement to its junior members before rejecting it. It decided for them, then organised applause for the decision. Vanguardism, in other words, wearing a stethoscope.

Enough has already been given. The next concession, if it comes, will not buy peace. It will buy the ballot after this one.

"The BMA's leadership speaks the language of professional stewardship while behaving like the most militant wing of the trade union movement it now openly admires"

[Great British PAC 🇬🇧 @GreatBritishPAC]

🇬🇧 10 DAYS TO GO 🇬🇧
Ten days until the Labour Government returns to court to try and remove Chagossians from their homeland.
We beat them once.
Now they are spending YOUR money to appeal that decision.
The Chagossians want to remain British.
The Chagossians want to live on their homeland.
The Chagossians deserve justice.
Please share.
#Chagos #JusticeForChagossians

[GB News @GBNEWS]

‘The system doesn’t care about the children.’

‘Ruby and others feel completely voiceless and powerless.’

Grooming gang whistleblower Maggie Oliver says victims of grooming gangs are frightened of the early release of their predators and are concerned about their safety.

[leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ @LeilaniDowding]

🤮🤮🤮🤮. We don’t have a justice system
We have a system filled with deceit Liars and/or perverts

[Global Dissident @GlobalDiss]

🚨🇬🇧 ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE IN BRITAIN!

The government is forcing tech giants to twist algorithms so you ONLY see BBC and establishment media lies.

The UK has gone full TYRANNY to brainwash the public

[Eva Vlaardingerbroek @EvaVlaar]

Five minutes on @X and you see one story after another of Europeans being killed, raped or assaulted.

If it weren’t for @elonmusk we would never hear about these stories.

The truth, along with the victims of mass migration, would just be buried.

[Active Patriot @ActivePatriotUK]

🚨 20-year-old Cody Harper is at Birmingham Magistrates Court on the 23rd July, charged with assaulting, a police officer. ( I Don't Think He Has Mate) You've all seen the video that went viral. Get down there if you can and back him up, they want to stick him in jail. Demand justice for Cody

[Jim Ferguson @JimFergusonUK]

🚨 THE MOMENT THE GENDER IDEOLOGY COLLAPSED.

During a remarkable interview, Labour's Health Secretary James Murray admitted he has changed his position on one of the defining debates of recent years.

Camilla Tominey: "Do you think a woman can have a penis? Because you did previously."

James Murray: "No, I don't."

Camilla Tominey: "So you've changed your mind?"

James Murray: "Yes."

Pressed on why, Murray struggled to explain how he had previously held the opposite view.

Tominey's response cut to the heart of the issue:

"You're very well educated. How on earth could you have previously thought that a woman could have a penis?"

This isn't just any politician.

It's the UK's Health Secretary—the minister responsible for the NHS, women's health, and healthcare policy.

For years, many people who argued that biological sex is real and immutable said they were dismissed, criticised, or labelled as bigots.

Today, positions that were once treated as beyond the pale are increasingly being accepted across politics, medicine and the courts.

The real question is this: if they were wrong then, who will be held accountable for the consequences of those policies

[Paranoid @ParanoiaRules]

@dshensmith is not very happy.
None of us should be very happy about the state controlling what we watch.
I am grateful that the Black Belt Barrister has links here to respond to the latest ploy to turn our democracy into dictatorship.
👇👇👇👇
https://t.co/K0PwYQVLcx

[Minxyminx1952🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @minxyminx1952]

@JChimirie66677 The country deserves better politicians.
We pay their salaries & in return for our vote expect the country be well run, economically sound & safe to live in.
We do not want their crackpot idealism, unnecessary interference in our lives & to be ground underfoot in the process.

[Peter Bleksley @PeterBleksley]

Woke, corrupt, useless. I’ve been saying this publicly about Police leadership for years. Finally, the Establishment have agreed with me…

https://t.co/ll0wmQGQva

[Cat Fish @CatFish1162594]

@David90shaw Yeah, I don’t think the same government that brings in Muslims to rape the children have suddendly decided that protecting them online is important

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: THE FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF BRITISH FREEDOM!

Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits.

You are probably still asleep after we knocked out the Mexicans last night, but you need to wake up to a terrifying new reality!

It has just leaked that Andy Burnham is quietly preparing to enforce strict new VPN restrictions to stop teenagers bypassing his under-16 social media ban. 🤡

They are trying to spin this as protecting the kids, but here is the absolute nightmare they are hiding from you.

You cannot restrict VPNs just for children.

To enforce this, the state will be forced to ban, monitor, or require a mandatory Digital ID check for every single VPN user in the United Kingdom.

They are literally building a state-controlled internet firewall, copying the exact digital prison models used by China and North Korea.

They want total control over what you are allowed to see, say, and access online so they can completely kill off independent free speech.

We are trading a failed Prime Minister for a high-tech socialist dictatorship.

RT to completely blow up the UK timeline and demand our freedom back! 🔁🇬🇧🔥

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

No Election Chose This Law. It Will Govern What Britain Reads Regardless.

On 23 June, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport published a Green Paper proposing that YouTube, Facebook and every major platform be required by law to place BBC, ITV and Channel 4 content ahead of everything else in the nation's feeds. On the same day, Sir Keir Starmer announced he would resign as Labour leader. The man who presided over this policy's launch will not be in office to answer for its consequences. The policy will still be law.

That sequence matters more than the policy's stated aim. A government whose leader is already leaving is asking the country to accept a permanent restructuring of how information reaches every citizen. No election produced this mandate. No successor has endorsed it. It arrives instead through the ordinary churn of departmental process, the kind that continues whether or not the politician who signed off on it remains in the building.

Consider what the paper actually asks the public to trust. It proposes to give legal priority to "trustworthy providers," yet admits it has not decided what trustworthy means. The definition is still out for consultation. The beneficiaries are not. BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 are named in the document before the criteria that would justify naming them have been written. The conclusion arrived before the argument.

This would be troubling in any circumstance. It is harder to defend given the BBC's own conduct. The corporation spliced two parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had ordered supporters to march on the Capitol, while removing the part where he told them to be peaceful. Trump is suing for ten billion dollars. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy called the BBC "the most trustworthy source of news, not just in this country, but across the world" on the very day her department opened a consultation asking what trustworthy should mean. The institution under active litigation for fabricating a world leader's words is the institution the policy assumes as its benchmark.

The mechanism is not hypothetical. A version of it already exists. Under the Media Act 2024's prominence rules for connected televisions, Ofcom's draft code requires six designated broadcaster apps, the BBC, ITV, STV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and S4C, to appear within the first nine tiles of a smart TV menu, leaving three slots for everyone else, including the platform's own service. The nine-tile window rather than six exists because STV serves Scotland and S4C serves Wales, so which broadcasters a viewer sees depends on where they live. The regulator built in room for that swap. Even so, the arithmetic still favours the state's chosen six. If the same ratio carries into search results and social feeds, it tells you plainly what happens to every independent voice competing for space. Nothing about "prominence" adds room. It only reassigns the room that already exists, and reassigns it toward the six providers the state has already chosen.

This is not the first time the state has drawn a legal line around legitimate journalism. The Online Safety Act already defines a "recognised news publisher," a category invented to grant certain protections online. The Green Paper points to that same definition as a likely basis for deciding who counts as trustworthy now. A boundary drawn once for one purpose is being reused to decide, a second time, whose speech the algorithm must promote and whose it may bury. Each use of the boundary makes the next easier to justify.

What should worry the public is not simply that a broadcaster with a documented record of fabrication is being handed statutory priority. It is that no vote produced this law, and no vote will be needed to keep it.

"Ofcom's draft code requires six designated broadcaster apps, the BBC, ITV, STV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and S4C, to appear within the first nine tiles of a smart TV menu"