Zero surprise, a judge appointed by a Democrat knocked the pro-ESA ballot proposition off the Arizona ballot. But I believe the Arizona Supreme Court will do the right thing and put it back on, because there is plenty of precedent where Democratic ballot measures amending the state constitution arguably had more than one provision but judges let them stay on the ballot.
In 2012, Prop. 121 was allowed to remain on the ballot with two provisions; changing the primary elections to a top-two open primary system and ending funding for certain primary election activities. It did not pass. In 2024, Prop. 139 contained multiple provisions expanding abortion, but was allowed to stay on the ballot and "passed."
Grand Canyon University announces the Department of Education has rescinded the largest fine ever levied against a single university https://t.co/kX4wY9weHg
Something that GOP doesn't seem to understand if you do not give Trump the nomination we are not going to vote Republican
We won't vote for DeSantis we're not going to vote for Bobby Lou Sue from pisswater Arkansas
It's Trump or fuck you
@SenMarkKelly You seem to be good at hooking people up.
Remember when you hooked up Frank Naughton with $982,000 in PPP loans and he bought his wife boobs and cars�
https://t.co/yovbFMxLMv
@TravisGrantham@azjustinheap@Forrestham1962 Does this bill not affect everyone in AZ? Justin answered in good faith. You come back snarky then want to privately discuss. What's wrong with an open and public debate in the new town square.