Imagine that an American judge sends secret orders by email to Brazilian companies. The orders require them to take actions inside Brazil that violate Brazilian law. The Brazilian executives are told in the email by the American judge not to notify Brazilian authorities or anyone else about the secret order.
Would anyone in Brasília call that “respect for American sovereignty”?
Sovereignty is not a one way shield. If a Brazilian Supreme Court justice wants his orders to have effect in another country, he must go through that country’s law, courts, and due process. That principle protects Brazil.
It also protects the United States.
No mesmo dia em que a moça - já muito curtida por outros famosos conservadores - me xinga e comemora a decisão de Moraes contra mim, ela também recebe com entusiasmo Ricardo Salles num spaces no X que ela é a anfitriã.
Vai lá inocente, vote no Salles porque é “didireita”.
"PODEM ME TIRAR TUDO, MAS A MINHA DIGNIDADE ELES NÃO TIRAM!"
Em entrevista à @rcomunicabrasil falei sobre perseguição que vem sofrendo.
Completo👇
https://t.co/ERtH8p1JWP
Como revelamos há meses, a origem do Banco Master está na Bahia de Jaques Wagner. Foi ele, quando secretário de Desenvolvimento na primeira gestão de Rui Costa como governador, que privatizou a Ebal (Empresa de Alimentos da Bahia), entregando de mão beijada a Lima e Vorcaro o Credcesta, um cartão de benefício consignado usado pelos servidores estaduais.
Um negócio bilionário comprado por meros R$ 15 milhões. Na ocasião, o Master ainda não tinha qualquer experiência anterior com consignado. Com o Credcesta, o banco de Vorcaro e Lima se expandiu rapidamente para o resto do país, passando a controlar a folha de pagamento de servidores ativos e inativos de estados e municípios.
O Credcesta chegou a representar 50% do faturamento do Master. A PF suspeita que Jaques é mais do que um novo político envolvido com Vorcaro, mas seu sócio.
🚨 Brazil’s Judicial Tyranny Escalates: Eduardo Bolsonaro Convicted in Latest Act of Lawfare – Concerns US
The Brazilian Supreme Court just sentenced Eduardo Bolsonaro in absentia to over 4 years in prison and banned him from office for 8 years — all for daring to ask the Trump administration to sanction rogue justices persecuting his family.
This is textbook lawfare: weaponizing courts to crush conservatives when voters won’t. Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest on flimsy “coup” charges, now his son targeted for seeking international help against censorship and overreach.
The U.S. is watching. Real democracy dies when judges become untouchable political enforcers.
Read the full story here: https://t.co/7pol2rlqTF
Brazil needs reform. The world needs to speak up. This must end. 🇧🇷 #Lawfare #FreeBrazil #Bolsonaro
STF ADMITE MINHA INOCÊNCIA
Em notícia feita pelo próprio STF, publicada em 25/MAI/2026, a corte confessa que:
-Eu resido nos EUA. Logo, Moraes deveria expedir carta rogatória e não me julgar à revelia.
-Atuava no exterior contra a perseguição, não para absolver meu pai. Isso, dentre outros argumentos, desmonta a tese base da acusação que eu estaria buscando a absolvição de meu pai através de sanções americanas.
-E corretamente diz que eu trabalhava por sanções individuais, não por tarifas contra Brasil. Cai a já moribunda tese de atentado contra a soberania nacional.
Eu mesmo printei👇
https://t.co/OUVTzitWhn
This morning, Rumble and Trump Media asked a U.S. federal court to enter default against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes.
Moraes was properly served by a method authorized by a federal judge. The 21-day deadline to respond passed. He did not appear, respond, or ask for more time. The Government of Brazil sought to intervene at the eleventh hour, but clarified that it does not represent Moraes.
Around the world, governments are increasingly trying to regulate speech beyond their borders. What is different about Moraes’s case is that a foreign official may now be held accountable in a U.S. court for trying to regulate the speech of U.S. persons inside the United States while bypassing the First Amendment — and for seeking private data of U.S. users while bypassing U.S. legal process.
This case is not about whether Brazil may enforce Brazilian law in Brazil. It is about whether a foreign judge may use secret orders to reach into the United States and control speech, data and platforms through unlawful coercive threats.
The answer should matter to every American, regardless of politics.
.@LulaOficial, someone who talks entirely too much shit, is projecting here.
Have you heard what happened today at the G7?
Lula tried to give a long, rambling, speech at the AI forum.
It was so bad - and Lula was so incoherent - that @EmmanuelMacron had to step in and cut him off because he wouldn’t shut up.
Lula got upset, threw a temper tantrum like a baby, and then got up and walked out.
So, yeah, Lula is someone who talks too much.
Lula não gostou da conversa com o Trump desta vez. Visivelmente contrariado. Os tempos de ser recebido com "I love you" parecem ter acabado. Foi desmascarado. O lobby para traficantes foi por água abaixo. Agora, faz corpo mole na negociação para tentar cavar uma tarifa. Também não vai dar certo, se Deus quiser e no que depender de nós.
🚨EMÍLIO SURITA:
"Você viu a lista do VORCARO? O único que não apareceu na lista é o que está preso. É o único! E na lista do mensalão ele tava fora também"
O crime de BOLSONARO foi ser honesto!
Statement from CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp on the Political Persecution of Eduardo Bolsonaro
CPAC condemns in the strongest possible terms the conviction and sentencing of Eduardo Bolsonaro by Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court. This is a grave violation of democratic norms, free speech, and the rule of law.
Let’s be clear: Eduardo Bolsonaro’s so-called “crime” was not violence. It was not corruption. It was not a threat against anyone. His alleged crime was exposing the corruption, censorship, and abuse of power taking place inside the Brazilian government and its Supreme Court.
This is lawfare, plain and simple. Eduardo Bolsonaro is being targeted for political reasons because he dared to speak the truth about what is happening in Brazil and because he refused to stay silent while his father, President Jair Bolsonaro, and millions of Brazilian conservatives were subjected to political persecution.
Justice Alexandre de Moraes has become the face of this judicial overreach. Moraes ignored a U.S. judicial proceeding related to censorship of Americans on social media only reinforced what the world already sees: Brazil’s ruling establishment wants the power to silence its critics at home while escaping scrutiny abroad.
Even more alarming, Moraes voted to convict Eduardo Bolsonaro in a case in which Moraes himself claims to be the victim. In any impartial judicial system, it would be unthinkable for a magistrate to act simultaneously as judge and alleged victim. Yet that is precisely what Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court has allowed, turning the appearance of justice into an instrument of political retribution.
No court should be above accountability. No judge should be allowed to censor political opponents, intimidate opponents, or punish citizens for speaking out. And no democracy can survive when criminal law is twisted into a weapon against the opposition.
CPAC stands with Eduardo Bolsonaro, President Jair Bolsonaro, and the Brazilian people who are fighting for free speech, fair elections, judicial accountability, and real democracy.
The world is watching Brazil. Conservatives across America and around the globe will not be silent while lawfare replaces justice.