Though my amendment to strike $3.3 billion in aid to Israel from the State Dept Approps bill did not pass, 104 House Members voted in favor of it. The tide is changing.
Americans want their tax dollars to be spent improving things here at home, not waging war and genocide.
@LeeKuanYimby@CoreyWriting "funding from Qatar"
^ Retard Alert ^
The Israelis love partnering with Qatar in order to fund Hamas.
You aren't fooling anyone. Try harder, tard.
Minority Leader Jeffries opposes the Massie-Khanna amendment to cut $3 billion of aid to Israel, but leaves members of his party to vote their conscience. My conscience is clear. I will
vote against using American tax dollars to fund genocide.
Revealed today: My texts were unconstitutionally collected during the Biden administration by Jack Smith’s illegal Arctic Frost investigation.
Congressmen still wrongly think DOJ protocols are an appropriate replacement for Fourth Amendment warrants.
https://t.co/dlNdAPILgA
For years, Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, then lied about it. Declassified documents show he didn't just fund it, he personally shaped what the intelligence community told the American people about COVID's origins. 18 agencies relied on his guidance.
On July 29th at 10 am, he will testify publicly before my Committee because the American people deserve the truth once and for all.
@_RebeccaMcCurdy@heraldscotland Amnesty UK was hijacked by political activists & does not involve itself in genuine human rights activities like UK's broken inhumane prison system
My “private epistemology” has turned toward applying the rubric “Why wouldn’t they?” That is, given everything we know with certainty they’ve done, what if anything would make X unlikely? It’s not itself dispositive (that would be lazy), but it’s a tool. It’s the rules of evidence they’ve earned. They get no presumption of innocence or benefit of the doubt, because of what they’ve shown themselves to be.
Yeah…nah.
Here’s what I think is happening instead.
I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim:
The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight.
The U.S. hides bioweapons programs.
The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs.
We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent.
We run drugs.
The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice.
Putin easily kills people outside Russia.
We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work.
U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases.
We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level.
There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs
Etc.
————
The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence.
Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong.
After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims.
I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim.
A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing.
A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.”
Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is.
We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.
A lifetime of one-sided skepticism exclusively in the direction of challenges to the narrative has to be on the Mt Rushmore of Boomer Intellectualism.
And now with AI bullet-points in his later years like an aging quarterback just going thru the motions in the pocket, beautiful
If you believed that chemically castrating children, dosing them with steroids, and destroying their fertility and sexual function was a way to affirm their authentic selves, it's because you are a lemming devoid of any independent capacity for judgment.
Unfortunately, the governing institutions of the Western world all joined the mad scramble off the cliff.
Twins died from SIDS at exactly the same time just 2 HOURS after being vaccinated. 2 hours. Exact the same time.
If vaccines don't cause SIDS, this event is statistically impossible.
https://t.co/HqRTx2aULB
@Leonardaisfunny One thing to also remember is that there are many intel agencies and departments. They could be all working for different agencies and might not know about the others.
Fuentes views align perfectly with an Ashkenazi-liberal run pied-piper controlled ops project.
I told you guys that Tim Pool, Nick Fuentes, and Ben Shapiro were all on the same team. It should be obvious now watching all three of them run cover for each other and use the same talking points, that they came out of the same training camp.
2022 🇷🇺: “Somebody in Russia [should] take [Putin] out.”
2023 🇷🇺:“Russians are dying… best money we’ve ever spent.”
2023 🇵🇸: “Gaza should be flattened.”
2024 🇵🇸: “This is Hiroshima & Nagasaki on steroids.” “If I were Israel, I’d do the same.” “Do whatever you have to do.” “Pull the Palestinian school system up by its roots and destroy it.”
2025 🇵🇸: “We’re killing all the right people.”
2026 🇮🇷: “We will obliterate them” over Strait of Hormuz.
I’m shocked that so many people are mourning his death. Mourning a monster doesn’t humanize the monster. It dehumanizes the mourner.
@AndrewJTobias Bravo to @amyactonoh for not being strong armed by these lunatic progressives who knows nothing about building statewide coalitions. Clearly they'd rather be "right" in their minds than win. That's the type of mentality that gets Vivek elected.
Transgenderism is an uncontrolled society-scaled experiment in conformity and obedience: a test of how far you can make people parrot absurdities, inflict cruelties, collude with unrealities, and ostracize and punish people for things they do not themselves believe.
It is a test of whether the moral self-abasements and routine betrayals that occurred in the Soviet Bloc with its secret police and political prisons and armies of informants could be replicated in liberal, democratic, and pluralistic societies that lacked this formal apparatus of repression: whether minor rewards and punishments could force people to punish people for stating the most self-evident of all truths and inspire them to cheer on the chemical castration and dismemberment of their own children. It is a test of whether civil liberties organization could be twisted into instruments of state repression and human rights groups instruments of defamation and violence against women.
It is a test that most of the Western world is failing.
Your median professor sits so far left that AOC, Sanders, and Warren would count as moderates in any faculty lounge.
Faculty from 55 elite universities form one towering blue spike of ideology far out on the left, density exploding past 6, with virtually nothing on the conservative side.
This was built through decades of selective hiring, social enforcement, and the systematic purge of dissent.
And because they credential the people who run media, law, government, and tech, the monoculture leaks into every elite institution downstream.