We have 2 choices. 1. the moderate choice is to handle things like Churchill would. 2. if we fail to do this we will have to revert to Henry 8th levels of toughness/brutality even torture to recover our Country
It was complained out of them. Men were happy being the breadwinner. Men were happy being the head of the family. And a lot of women complained about it. And they complained too much. And now it's gone.
I ACTUALLY MISS THE ERA WHEN MEN TOOK PRIDE IN PROVIDING FOR THEIR WOMEN.
When men paid the rent, covered the bills, sent their girlfriends shopping money, bought them cars and made sure they never had to stress about certain expenses.
A man willingly taking care of his woman isn’t a weakness. It’s love, generosity and commitment.
WHAT HAPPENED TO MEN WHO ACTUALLY ENJOYED SPOILING THEIR WOMEN?
@Pats_Aura It was complained out of them. Men were happy being the breadwinner. Men were happy being the head of the family. And a lot of women complained about it. And they complained too much. And now it's gone.
Scholars note extensive parallels between Quranic narratives and earlier Jewish, Syriac Christian, and pre-Islamic Arabian traditions (e.g., prophet stories, apocrypha motifs like the Cave of Treasures or Infancy Gospels, local rituals). Exact "copying" percentage is unquantifiable—retellings adapt and theologically reframe shared late-antique Near Eastern material rather than direct plagiarism. Traditional Islamic view holds the text as independent divine revelation confirming prior scriptures.
Most of the Quran is theological or moral content that cannot be empirically proven or disproven. Historical narratives often parallel older Near Eastern traditions with limited independent archaeological confirmation. Nature descriptions are open to interpretation; classical readings differ from modern scientific-miracle claims, which many scholars on all sides critique as post-hoc. No rigorous percentage of the text qualifies as proven true or disproven.
Thank you for your answer. And how much of the Quran?Could have been copied from other religions and belief systems that were around at the time. What inspiration could have been taken from other religions and theories that were around at the time when Muhammad allegedly wrote the Quran?
The entire Quran is a lie created by Satan come on debate me.
THE BIBLE WARNED ABOUT FALSE ANGELIC REVELATIONS MORE THAN 500 YEARS BEFORE MUHAMMAD.
Let’s look at the historical timeline, because the dates raise a serious theological question.
AD 50–56 — THE APOSTLE PAUL’S WARNING
In Galatians 1:8, written during the first century, Paul declared:
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (KJV)
Notice what Paul said. Even if an ANGEL FROM HEAVEN delivered a different Gospel, Christians were commanded to reject it.
AD 55–56 — ANOTHER BIBLICAL WARNING
In 2 Corinthians 11:14, Paul wrote:
“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” (KJV)
The Bible explicitly warns that an apparently heavenly messenger is not automatically trustworthy.
AD 610 — MUHAMMAD’S REPORTED REVELATION
More than FIVE CENTURIES LATER, according to Islamic tradition, Muhammad was inside the Cave of Hira near Mecca when he encountered a being identified as the angel Gabriel.
This encounter marked the beginning of the Quranic revelations.
But consider what those revelations taught.
The New Testament proclaims Jesus Christ as the Son of God, crucified for humanity’s sins and resurrected from the dead.
The Quran rejects Jesus’ divinity and disputes His crucifixion.
NOW ASK YOURSELF THIS:
How can a Christian accept a later revelation that contradicts the central message of the Gospel, when the Apostle Paul had already warned against accepting a different Gospel EVEN IF AN ANGEL DELIVERED IT?
This is not about attacking Muslims or denying anyone’s freedom to worship.
This is about examining religious claims against the authority of Scripture.
The Bible does not specifically name Muhammad in these warnings. But from the Christian perspective, the principle is unmistakable: no claimed angelic revelation has the authority to overturn the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
THE TIMELINE MATTERS.
Paul’s warning: approximately AD 50–56.
Muhammad’s reported revelation: AD 610.
More than 550 years separate them.
And for Christians who stand on the authority of the New Testament, the question remains:
If Scripture already warned us not to accept another Gospel delivered by an angel, why should we abandon that warning for a revelation that came centuries later?
My faith stands with Jesus Christ and the Gospel proclaimed by His apostles. No later revelation will change that.
Danny Tommo faces 248 days in jail for allegedly damaging a migrant dinghy with no migrants in it, before he even stands trial. But if you're a paedophile Labour councillor convicted of having over a million child porn images, you walk out of court free.
Burnham is in Dublin TODAY with European leaders, then Brussels next week to sign his EU "reset."
17.4 MILLION of us voted to leave. Respect it and respect the peoples decision.
Should Labour drop the rejoin talk for good?
No single country ranks as the clear worst overall, as metrics vary. Indonesia’s Citarum is frequently cited as the most polluted river from industrial toxins. India ranks high for sewage-heavy rivers like the Ganges and Yamuna. For plastic reaching oceans via rivers, the Philippines leads, followed by India, Malaysia, China and Indonesia.
@nostalsokei Well known that if you throw huge amounts of garbage and plastics in rivers it magically disappears ... 😐
I think the mentality is this: if I dump my garbage it's someone else problem to clean up. In my Sweden maybe 1% think like that. In India it seems to be 99%.