@EmmGoldstein84@DailyMail pick and choose tends do denote a lack of specific criteria. They have specified when to pick and choose so it's more the rules than out of any racial or political bias
@EmmGoldstein84@DailyMail Government report stated that was due to an attempt to prevent riots as seen after Southport. It has officially set a precedent for high profile high casualty cases regarding transparency. This is not high casualty and not suspected terrorism like Liverpool was initially
@T0NYalexander@LBCNews If deemed in the public interest the right to privacy can be lifted by the government. Is it in the public's interest? Not compared to other cases imo. We'll find out the name in good time
@T0NYalexander@LBCNews We have laws to protect names until we are more certain they likely did the crime. This is to protect incorrect arrested people and their families from their lives being ruined, lynchings (though that's more America than here), and intrusions.
@Angeleena25@LBCNews They can't say thrown in till it's confirmed by the police. It's not cause a hidden agenda, it's just trying to ensure they are factual. Could have been drop kicked for all you know
@EmmGoldstein84@DailyMail Obviously this man did do it. However we have these rules to prevent families and people having their lives ruined over a misarrest