Boris Masramon

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

What @KyDickens and her crew has done, with this spotify podcast, is amazing. It has changed my view of everything. But a well done film documentary (with many episodes) is needed, to really make an impact worldwide. #TheTelepathyTapes

https://t.co/B6J4evNASn

[George Knapp @g_knapp]

NSA Releases Hundreds of Pages of Formerly Top Secret UMBRA UAP Records After Disclosure Foundation FOIA Appeal | Disclosure Foundation https://t.co/CdrThBuqfx

[Beatriz Villarroel @DrBeaVillarroel]

Dear @ProfAviLoeb . I very much enjoyed reading your text. I appreciate the respectful critique and the ideas you bring to the discussion. I would just like to point out that neither the deficit in the Earth's shadow at 42,000 km altitude nor Kevin Cann's anticorrelation of transient detections with the geomagnetic storm index Kp can be explained by the cosmic-ray hypothesis for the transients. If cosmic rays were responsible, we would expect to see a correlation, not an anticorrelation. Nevertheless, please keep the good ideas coming!

https://t.co/ArP81jTcQS

[Christopher K. Mellon @ChrisKMellon]

I was stunned to see the Naval Postgraduate School (@NPS_Monterey) doing a special issue on UAP.

Another small example of the progress being made in winning acceptance for the validity and importance of UAP for national security and science.

https://t.co/sQW1Qk5XiW

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@I_D_Official A & D Both great things.

[Beatriz Villarroel @DrBeaVillarroel]

Great article on UAP disclosure in New Lines Magazine -- and many thanks for the nice mention. @newlinesmag https://t.co/NBRecj64fN

[Ross Coulthart @rosscoulthart]

Japan’s Government acknowledges it has UAP data, including video footage. And it will begin disclosure, subject to national security constraints.

[Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure @I_D_Official]

Nick Pope spent the early 1990s running the UFO desk at the UK Ministry of Defence.

He spent the next 30 years talking openly about what he saw and what he believed.

That kind of consistency is rare. So was he.

His last public words: "I hope I moved the needle."

He did.

https://t.co/duzanTuZyd

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@moondailys Lluna

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@joncoopertweets The boat

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@Lina_rays1ya E

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@AZ_Brittney Yes

[UAP James @UAPJames]

Rep. Burlison describes UAP videos of “glowing orbs that look like balls of plasma” moving at “incredible speeds”

“I can’t tell what they are and neither can the people that filmed them… It defies logic… I don’t think our Intelligence Community knows what these things are.”

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@thedaywar90 Let’s go!

[Bill Maher @billmaher]

If you don’t believe aliens are here and observing us, maybe you’re the conspiracy theorist.

[Boris Masramon @BorisMasramon]

@BetsyGain A

[Interstellar @InterstellarUAP]

🚨 Lue Elizondo says the U.S. Government is in possession of a “game-changing” classified UFO video in 4K Ultra HD. 🛸👽

Rep Anna Paulina Luna & Rep Eric Burlison have also hinted to seeing this video in a SCIF. Burlison recently said he has seen a 15 second video in HD

Insiders have said there will be “Zero Doubt” when the public see this video.

Could this be one of the videos @realannapaulina is trying to get declassified if Trump signs the Executive Order?

[Chris Ramsay @chrisramsay52]

Replicable ☑️
Peer Reviewed ☑️

[Skywatch Signal @UAPWatchers]

🚨3I/ATLAS Is Carrying Fusion Fuel at Impossible Levels and the Mainstream Explanation Doesn't Hold

Dr. Avi Loeb is laying out something about 3I/ATLAS that is buried inside a technical discussion, one that you and I may not get to hear about in mainstream science. However the point that Loeb is making is really difficult to ignore when you listen to the facts.

We are all aware by now that we are dealing with an interstellar object, something that didn't originate in our solar system, that passed through and was observed closely enough for its chemical composition to be analyzed. That was an amazing opportunity, but what came out of that analysis is where things start to get spicy.

The reason I say that this is interesting is because of deuterium. Yes it is a known isotope of hydrogen with an extra neutron and yes it exists everywhere, but only in very small quantities. Across the universe, the ratio is remarkably consistent. Roughly one atom of deuterium for every 50k atoms of hydrogen. That number doesn't change much whether you're looking at stars, gas clouds, or planetary systems.

Even in places where it's slightly elevated, like Earth's oceans, it's still nowhere near significant enough to stand out in a major way. It's measurable, but it doesn't dominate anything.

That's the baseline that we have to make comparisons from. Now take that baseline and compare it to what was measured in 3I/ATLAS.

Instead of one in 50k, you're looking at something closer to one in a hundred in water, and one in thirty in methane. That is a huge jump and once you take that into consideration you're no longer talking about natural variation in any conventional sense at least.

The first explanation is the one you would expect. Extremely cold environments, possibly tied to very early star formation, where deuterium can be preserved more efficiently than in regions like our own solar system. All that explanation does is give you a place to put the anomaly without breaking anything, aka mainstream scientific models. But it doesn't actually resolve the full picture.

Here's why... The same object showing this deuterium enrichment also contains heavier elements like carbon and oxygen in ways that don't align with those early environments. The universe at that stage didn't have enough of those elements available in the right quantities to produce what we're seeing now. So what you end up with is a contradiction. The conditions that could explain the deuterium don't support the rest of the chemistry, and the conditions that support the chemistry don't explain the deuterium.

That's where the conversation conversation obviously becomes difficult for the 'tenure' crowd, because when formation models stop lining up as predicted by archaic models, you're left with a narrower set of possibilities. Either there's a process we don't yet fully understand that can produce this combination, or something has happened to the material after it formed.

Considerations by non mainstream science would be that this is not random alteration, but something more deliberate. Processing, concentration, separation steps that could possibly mean function rather than accident. This is where deuterium stops being just an interesting anomaly and starts mean something very different.

Deuterium is one of the primary fuels used in nuclear fusion. Every serious attempt to build a functional fusion reactor on Earth relies on it, typically in combination with tritium. It's efficient, predictable, and it's exactly the kind of material you would isolate and concentrate if you intended to use it as an energy source.

So when you see an object carrying deuterium at levels this far beyond any natural baseline we observe locally, we have to wonder what conditions would allow that concentration to exist, and whether those conditions are passive or active.

That doesn't automatically push you into extreme conclusions, but it does move you out of the safe 'mainstream' zone where everything can be explained with known processes. That's the part that tends to get softened in how this is presented publicly of course.

There's a difference between saying something is unusual and admitting that it doesn't currently fit within the models we rely on. One side invites curiosity whilst the other invites scrutiny.

What you're seeing here is that tension in real time because the data is absolutely clear enough to acknowledge the anomaly, but the interpretation is being held just short of where it would need to go to fully confront it.

So what you're left with is a set of open questions that aren't being pushed by mainstream science, and I am sorry if it sounds like I have a drum to bang, but here we are.

Could this be evidence of a type of cosmic environment we haven't observed directly yet, one capable of producing extreme isotopic enrichment alongside complex chemistry?

Is there something in the way that we're measuring or interpreting the data that's creating a misleading picture of the ratios?

Or are we looking at material that hasn't remained in a purely natural state since its formation?

That last question is the one that tends to sit just beneath the surface, acknowledged but not explored too directly and that's not because it's impossible, but because of what it might imply if it turned out to be true, and that's where this becomes worth paying attention to.

If this isn't an isolated curiosity then it is yet another one of the already stacked list of anomalies tied to interstellar objects, unusual motion, unexpected structural behavior, and now chemical signatures. Each one on its own can be managed, explained, or set aside, but taken together, they start to form a pattern that really does warrant further consideration.

3I/ATLAS may still end up having a natural explanation and I have always maintained that is always on the table. But if that explanation exists, it's not something we've defined yet, and it's not something that fits inside of current models, and until it does, the signal remains what it is.

An object from outside our system, carrying a level of fusion capable material that doesn t match anything we see in our own environment, tied to formation theories that don't fully hold up under scrutiny.

#UAP #InterstellarObject #3IATLAS #SpaceAnomalies #FusionFuel #JWST #Astrophysics #UFOtwitter #Disclosure

[John Greenewald, Jr. @theblackvault]

Last night, FoxNews covered the disappearance of retired United States Air Force major general, and former commander of Air Force Research Laboratory, Neil McCasland, and other scientists that may be connected.