T.A.N ( 🌎/acc )

『』『“I believe I can do anything” 』『』

[Shrub @Shrubcoinbnb]

I can read it now !

[The Smart Ape 🔥 @the_smart_ape]

$FRONG is not the first token on uniswap's launchpad.

it's launch #464 out of 793. the first 1 was a test called "Testing CCA on Robinhood Chain" deployed 3 weeks earlier.

but here's what makes it special:

> it went through a launch contract that doesn't officially exist, dev branch only, deployed the day before, patched 37 min after

> its frog was already on pools[.]trade's cdn 45 hours before the token existed. it's the product's own mascot

> it was launched by the guy who designed the product. the fee nft in the launch tx points to labadie.eth

> and it's the only one of the 793 the crowd picked

[Opifor @Opifor]

Correction to my previous post: I got one important part wrong.

I said I had found no direct transfers between Zack Labadie’s verified wallets and the wallet that launched $FRONG. That
conclusion was incomplete. I had checked Ethereum and Robinhood Chain, but I had not included Base.

Once Base is included, the attribution picture changes significantly.

It is 100% proven onchain that the wallet which launched FRONG, 0xE195...cE58, had previously been directly funded by
0x1db6...2FD0, a wallet cryptographically verified on Zack Labadie’s official Farcaster profile:

https://t.co/drsaUtRGbA

The actual FRONG launch caller was E195:

https://t.co/hMu03StUus

On November 26, 2024, Zack’s verified wallet sent 0.000601647451057836 ETH directly to E195. This was E195’s first normal
transaction and first native funding on Base:

https://t.co/nyF37E6eTH

On January 7, 2025, the same wallet directly transferred four NFT/ERC-1155 assets to E195.

The following day, it sent another 0.005869440312463167 ETH:

https://t.co/7FbcmGRN99

On February 27, 2025, it also called transfer(E195, 205.795452805595001658) on the HIGHER token contract:

https://t.co/IeRxAPT1HF

These are not explorer labels, beneficiary settings, or identity fields supplied by the FRONG caller. They are direct outbound
transactions initiated by Zack’s verified wallet between 518 and 610 days before FRONG launched.

That distinction changes everything.

A random third party could copy Zack’s public handle, wallet address, uploader metadata, and the frog asset after discovering
the public https://t.co/nItIRFUSB1 site. The launcher accepts unverified identity metadata, and anyone can select a public wallet as fee
beneficiary.

But a random third party cannot go back in time and create signed 2024 and 2025 transactions from Zack’s verified wallet to
E195.

The rest of the factual evidence in my original post remains correct:

The frong.mp4 asset used by https://t.co/nItIRFUSB1 carries archived S3 metadata naming [email protected] as its uploader:

https://t.co/c6yjsDc2lz

E195 launched FRONG and selected the same Zack-linked wallet as its fee beneficiary.

E195 then used the same Uniswap launch infrastructure to test both an instant pool through FRONG and an LBP/CCA launch through
CHWDR.

The exact ETH used immediately before FRONG was bridged by E195 from its own Ethereum address, so the historical Base
transfers were not the final FRONG gas transfer. But they prove something more important for attribution: E195 already had a
direct, repeated and long-standing operational relationship with Zack’s verified wallet.

This makes the “completely unrelated third party copied public information” scenario much weaker than I previously thought.

My updated conclusion is that FRONG was very likely an internal Uniswap/pools.trade test launched from a team-linked wallet.

There is still no signed statement proving that Zack personally controlled E195’s private key. That final distinction matters
if we are making a strict key-ownership claim.

But the historical funding and operational connection are no longer speculation. They are fully verifiable onchain.

The proof was not in the FRONG transaction alone. It was sitting in E195’s older Base history.

[Peter Navarro @RealPNavarro]

Fauci lied and Americans died.

His diary proves I was right. China travel ban. Lab leak. Hydroxychloroquine. Masks. Lockdowns.

America deserves accountability.

MORE HERE 👇

https://t.co/6PolV2HkOu

[toly 🇺🇸 @toly]

👑👑👑

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@world_xyz Gm $world 🌎

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

Every cult starts with a few believers.
Every bull run starts the same way.

🌍 $world

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

you're all in this picture .
$world @world_xyz

[Solana @solana]

you're all in this picture

[401k @401kHood]

$401k have now distributed over $200,000 worth of tokenized stocks on Robinhood chain.

Only the beginning.

[world @world_xyz]

tradition has a new market

wimbledon on world 🎾

[Yavuz @yavuzdex]

https://t.co/PieZiHgp8y

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@mattlefun @world_xyz @solana

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@bioduncrypt @world_xyz @solana Love letter for @world_xyz 😅

[toly 🇺🇸 @toly]

👑👑👑

[Ario 🌲 @ario_57_]

update: after careful consideration over the last 24 hours

I’ve made the decision to publish the full @world_xyz prediction market dashboard

this includes volume, volume by category, volume by AMM, users, transactions, and market stats over the last 24H

this was not made lightly

if you need anything specific, just dm me!

🔗 https://t.co/Bkq9jPbZsm

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@zinc_cash @RobinhoodCrypto @Arcium Wrong joke :))) Leaving solana is looking for something bad 🤣

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@world_xyz @loaf_eu @joshyote @HunterBiden 😅

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

I like the way $world attracts attention 😅 Can you call it sarcasm? @world_xyz

[world @world_xyz]

update: after careful deliberation from the team in the last 24 hours

world has made the decision to migrate off of solana and onto @RobinhoodCrypto chain

this tactful pivot was not made lightly

our sincere appreciation goes out to the solana foundation and community

[T.A.N ( 🌎/acc ) @Bowbnb]

@Eternals_io Giờ Ảo thật đấy bro. Con OG ra rất lâu rồi . Nhìn thấy cap 2-300k mà thấy rén . Bựa :-))