@glingleblrg@Himmoth05516792@DenzoBAU Google is free. Archbishop James Ussher came up with that in the 17th century. It is not recognized to be accurate by the church.
I sincerely hope you never procreate. Would be a shame to have more deformed retards like yourself in our world taking up our precious resources.
@ScammoonR@C_S_Skeptic@therealworld_ai No shit, Sherlock. He’s referring to the statistical model of playing blackjack the most efficient way possible that gives you the best odds at beating the house.
Believe it or not, you can actually win gambling btw.
@mck73081858@C_S_Skeptic@therealworld_ai True, I’m not saying that though. I’m replying to a guy saying Tate “thinks he has a system” and that he “doesn’t understand the statistical model”. BS is a legitimate system that does in fact have statistical models.
@chetto2099@C_S_Skeptic@therealworld_ai It’s called Basic Strategy literally. Things like 2s, 3s and 7s you split versus a dealer 2-7 face up. 4s you split versus a 5/6 face up. It’s the mathematically best way to play BJ to win.
@SamuelDAThomas@therealworld_ai He never said you would have an advantage. The advantage the house has goes down to 0.5%. That is actually true and why playing with Basic Strategy is the best way to win.
@C_S_Skeptic@therealworld_ai You realize he’s not wrong here, right? He’s referring to Basic Strategy which in a standard game of blackjack will give you a 49.5% edge versus the house.
@Hoodie_Milly@therealworld_ai Not true. He’s referring to Basic Strategy which is the most efficient way to play blackjack in the long run. Playing with BS gives you a 49.5% edge, so the house only has a 50.5% edge on you. He’s not wrong.
@alecmets2011@sethhow26816330@slxthkween@SuperFrostyNips@unirespecter Are you this bitch made? I guarantee you if someone parked in your driveway to go walk around you would confront them. No shot you’re going to hide in your house and call the cops without asking them to leave lmfaooo
Say it louder
“Who are the real colonizers” (Muslims)
Without Arab imperialism:
- Egyptians would be Coptic
- Moroccans would be Berber
- Libya and Algeria would be Amazigh
- Syria and Lebanon would be Aramaic speaking and partly Phoenician
- Iraq would be Mesopotamian
- Assyrian, Babylonian
- Sudan would be Nubian
- Tunisia would be Carthaginian Punic or Amazigh
- Iran would be Persian, Zoroastrian
- Kurdistan would be Median, Zoroastrian
- Somalia would be Kosherik
“The Arab conquests erased civilizations and destroyed many cultures. Without Arab imperialism, the Middle East would still remember its own name.
They are the colonizers.”