The Brando_Dragon

Follow me on instagram at for more artwork

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@_XxICEBEARxX @God_Questioner the “babies” are clumps of cells way before they develop. No one is aborting fully formed babies in the womb. Cell clumps aren’t more important than the person who’s body the cells are in

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@keiichimorisato @KuuTuber yet you’ll notice how if you look any further into history beyond the surface level, they were literally not socialist in any meaningful way beyond the party name, as every relevant historical scholar agrees on, so try again

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@xMBGx Really fun game, just completed the story and enjoyed it the whole time, has flaws of course but i’ve seen enough negativity on it that i’m just going to say it’s a fun time

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @JingoJungleNL @OGranRevol97710 then that’s just cognitive dissonance. But just for the sake of it, please tell me what makes your interpretation of christianity the undeniable truth without any room for error despite the lack of any evidence for it. What is your reasoning

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @JingoJungleNL @OGranRevol97710 1. That’s arrogant to assume you’re the only correct one, even among the different sects of your own religion.

2. You openly responded to the original tweet, therefore inviting debate and conversation.

3. You’re a bigot for holding these hateful worldviews against queer people

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @JingoJungleNL @OGranRevol97710 well factually it’s not a given, if it was there would be no debate between religions. The fact you’re trying to use religion as a base for your argument but asserting it cannot be argued against is disingenuous and shows you have no desire for an actual discourse

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @JingoJungleNL @OGranRevol97710 it’s still circular because you’re insisting god exists without true evidence. You’re using each talking point to prove the other without evidence of either

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 you have absolutely no way to prove that, literally just assertions

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 Well since you seem to think nothing has meaning beyond some all knowing being that can’t be proven one way or the other, i’ll happily stick to the idea that we give our own lives meaning, that’s far more comforting than following the dubious morals the bible teaches you

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 what a nihilistic world view, you think if god doesn’t ground morality then nothing does? That’s a sad way to live

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 the objective morality argument comes for the presupposition that there is some grand universal morality, there isn’t and there doesn’t need to be one. Morality is formed based on what is socially acceptable. It is usually based around what is beneficial for a society

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 and the you can’t prove that’s true just as I can’t prove that it isn’t, therefore it is not a valid argument to make. This is why religion isn’t and should not be used to dictate things, there are so many and none of them are unfalsifiable. Your blind belief is what is childish

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 So you don’t have a valid reason, right that’s what I thought. You cannot prove god exists as I can’t prove he does, therefore he is a non factor in proving literally anything, try an actual reason for a change

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 This entire thread has been about gay people but whatever. For what reason must it only be between man and woman. Why can’t a man and man or woman and woman engage in intercourse for expressing love. Why must it be deemed evil. Again, if it’s religion, that’s not valid

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 So… why is it such a problem if they do? Do you have the same issue if two straight people have sex without procreation? If the only reason you have an issue with gay sex is because of your religion, then as I said before, you have no right to enforce your religion on others.

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 there’s no functional difference between the two here. A gay person does not choose to be gay, they just are. So by calling the “choice” of homosexuality evil, you are calling them evil. A gay person cannot choose to be not gay the same way you can’t choose to be straight

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@God_Is_Sovreign @sanskarstine Sorry but it’s still natural. Your religious doctrine is starting to seep in. There’s nothing deviant about homosexuality, the hate you feel for them is more deviant to be honest

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@JustAGuy_tbh @OGranRevol97710 sorry but calling someone evil is definitely judging them. You have no authority to claim your interpretation of your religion has any bearing over another persons life.

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@Inking2038 @God_Is_Sovreign @sanskarstine except for the fact we are all part of the animal kingdom and have many similar traits to each other I guess

[The Brando_Dragon @Brando_Dragon04]

@Inking2038 @God_Is_Sovreign @sanskarstine homosexuality is a human term that is described to define an observed behavior. homosexuality itself isn’t the construct, the term is. What natural alternative would you consider homosexuality observed in animals to be