Brandon L

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@JadenPlayerOne @401_da_sarpanch Yes. HTA section 1.1 states LGIC may prescribe that the HTA or any regulation under it, or specific parts of them apply to any specified place/class of place.

This can (and currently does) include certain private property:

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@JadenPlayerOne @401_da_sarpanch Stunt regulation (O. Reg 455/07) applies to any parking lot (private or public), plus several other areas like fields or bike trails.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@402SportsBets @TOSportsAdam @GinoHard_ Detroit goalie lol

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@MinorMidgetGTHL @hollowsrfree @APetrielli True, but this was much more a "slash" than McMann. This was a swing. McMann was closer to a tap lol

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@RachelKryshak "If, in the judgment of the Referee, a goalkeeper uses

his blocking glove to punch an opponent in an attempt to or to

deliberately injure an opponent, a match penalty may be assessed."

Attempt to injure is the other part. Not saying I agree with the call, clear Leafs tax lol

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@SaskyChris4 @TicTacTOmar Could've came up when linesman came in to discuss... but they didn't announce it in the initial set of penalties, so maybe it was during the review lol

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@flakbait_inc @NHLPlayerSafety No hearing = no additional suspension.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@RSkalba4 Should be a lifetime ban and charged with assault with a weapon. Modern day McSorley.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@RockySaganiuk @RachelKryshak Completely agree. Carbon copy of McSorley, if not worse.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@HillysEgo @PuckReportNHL Ever heard of Marty McSorley?

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@Fitness2Finance @CraigHickingbo1 @OPP_HSD Probably reduced, yeah.

If I had to guess - he pleas guilty to stunt, higher fine and/or suspension given the speed, and dangerous driving charge is dropped.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@CraigHickingbo1 @OPP_HSD An estimate/range yeah. Even if they don't know the exact speed, high rate of speed and weaving is enough for stunt and possibly dangerous too.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@paulinebrown351 @LichTamara Standing up to the federal government... who did not impose the stay at home orders or (almost all of) the restrictions.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@Ravens_D @OPP_HSD Nope, can't have an open container readily accessible to anyone inside the vehicle.

Trunk is fine, or inside a closed bag (ex. Zipped backpack), but not in your hand lol

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@simoneduff1 @hns585 @RonFilipkowski Exactly. Here in Canada it's just impaired driving. There's specific offences for different combinations (alcohol only, alcohol + drug, etc) or legal blood limits (ex. BAC over 80mg), but same roadside penalties. Minimum sentence for certain ones is higher.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@HommerDH @OPP_HSD Likely insecure load, improper means of attachment, among other things.

Criminal negligence is likely the highest charge they could get if someone died.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@Mulva34 @401_da_sarpanch Insecure load under 111(2).

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@storytellrwendy @CP24 Very hard to get a conviction when a vehicle is involved, unless it's clearly deliberate - and even then.

Criminal negligence causing death would be the next step up.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@Cin98609046 @401_da_sarpanch @freetorcam But not murder in the eyes of the law, unfortunately.

[Brandon L @BrandonL1r]

@Kittie40Girl @401_da_sarpanch @freetorcam Canada doesn't have veh homicide, only dangerous or impaired operation causing death, or crim negligence causing death. Manslaughter is possible too, but very difficult to get a conviction unless they intentionally drive at someone - and even then.