ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ

Bad faith warrants an instablock, but I will milk you for your BS if it means I get to show others what you really are. If that upsets you, just block me first.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

If you're in an argument with/blocked by me, you have made it clear that you endorse the ethnic erasure of the Boers and/or any social group that intersects to form our identity, including (but not limited to):

• Reformed Christianity
• the Afrikaans language
• Boer history

[Elfworld Ecologian @Romans8Shaman]

The JEW ON A STICK said I can't rape, steal, and murder people in the next village over for fun. WEST FALLEN!

[DAKKADAKKA @DAKKADAKKA1]

>be leftist
>become popular
>be emotionally disturbed by Charlie Kirk being killed
>the left now wants you dead too

Cest la vie. Lay with pigs buddy.

[Operation St Cyprian @OpStCyprian]

Dunking on Protestants way more important than being consistent with Hebrews

[Cpt. Mucho Texto @CptMuchoTexto]

I love that leftists now have to resort to using klansmen as self-inserts and becoming more socially permissive of slurs, because they finally realized pot, pentagrams, and putting "fuck" in every sentence stopped being edgy over a decade ago.

Could you possibly have a more obvious sign staring you in the face that you are losing the culture war?

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Cellarspectre @sylintactgrate @ZELLKLUMPEN And then everybody clapped.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@sylintactgrate @Cellarspectre @ZELLKLUMPEN "Half the comments" and it's literally just one guy you decided to thread with against everyone else you cowed away from responding to.

You're not fooling anyone.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Cellarspectre @sylintactgrate @ZELLKLUMPEN The guy he replied under in the QRT'd post literally engaged with it directly and gave his reasoning why.

You're either disingenuous, or you're dippy.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Aelthemplaer @shaz_am1 Did you delete your Substack? I can't see you on there anymore.

[The Layman Apologist 🥛 @apologistlayman]

If anyone is seriously considering Catholicism, you need to answer this question.

Why are Catholics constantly seeking after signs when Christ said, “A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign” (Matthew 16:4), while blessing those “that have not seen, and yet have believed” (John 20:29)? Protestants possess faith, so we do not need miracles to vindicate our claims.

See what it’s like when someone constructss a truly weak and horrible argument against your position?

[shoe @shoe0nhead]

imo you literally get that “spark” all over again. everything is a new experience to your kid. seeing a bug? coolest thing ever. eating ice cream. amazing. going for a car ride. painting a picture. even every day normal activities like grocery shopping are an incredible experience with them. holidays like christmas, easter, halloween etc all feel like how they felt like when you were a kid again. everything is exciting again because you are seeing the world for the first time through their eyes

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Cellarspectre @sylintactgrate @ZELLKLUMPEN You're welcome to explain it. The Courtier's Reply is a fallacy.

[John Bria @JohnLBria]

@sylintactgrate @ZELLKLUMPEN Great projection, because that’s what your scenario was trying to do, and then you cried when the flaw in your logic was exposed via reductio ad absurdum

[LutheRem☧ 🦬 @AnimeAugsburg]

Me discovering the early church was messier, more diverse, and more complex than the apologists like to let on:

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@grok @gratis_fuchs @carrtmannn @ZoomerHistorian Shaddup nerd

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@sylintactgrate

[Watchman of Albion @albion_watchman]

@sylintactgrate What a retard.

The moral test isn’t which one you would save (obv it’s the live baby) it’s whether you would feel remorse about not saving the fetuses.

Pro-lifers would, pro-aborts wouldn’t because they don’t see them as human.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Mongu_please @sylintactgrate atheists*

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@Cellarspectre @sylintactgrate @ZELLKLUMPEN https://t.co/PXmIHuOoGh

[manamancer @manamancer]

It's a useless hypothetical because it doesn't actually get at the real moral question. We don't live in a world of collapsing IVF centers with random unattended infants, and the choice of who to save in that contrived scenario is likely going to be emotional and/or logistical. I have no qualms saying I'd save the infant, but it doesn't reveal anything about the value of the human in the actual scenario: that of a pregnant woman debating if she should kill it.

Like, obviously unborn children are easier to disregard on an emotional, gut level. That's the problem at the center of all this. The whole point is to push back on that and your hypothetical just restates it.

[ᚠᚩᛚᚳᛋᚻᚪᛚᛞ @BrandwagSP]

@grok @gratis_fuchs @carrtmannn @ZoomerHistorian Agreed. We already know who it is.

[𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚖𝚙 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚜 @ZELLKLUMPEN]

let's see how woke you are.