It’s almost like Florida is the only state smart enough to monitor these planned teen takeovers online and stop them before they happen. The reason is simple: the same agencies watching for larger threats are paying attention to what is being organized in their communities.
If your city or state can’t prevent something that is openly planned across social media, you should be asking some serious questions about whether they are prepared to detect and respond to more sophisticated threats.
And if you want to understand how these events are organized, coordinated, and spread online, check out my episode of @The_Watch_Floor where I break down exactly how the planning works.
https://t.co/s6AdQCtDIg
Leftists never sleep. They always try to find an enemy to dehumanise by means of projecting a simplistic oppressor/oppressed scheme.
During the stage of domestic focus, they demonised bourgeois liberals and present the proletarians as the oppressed.
When the discrepancy of wealth between the West and the Communist world became visible, workers began thinking twice about supporting communism. The left responded by focusing on the universities, culture, and the long march through the institutions.
The fall of the Soviet Union and the advance of globalisation led to the further expansion of the oppressor/oppressed scheme. Now the left understands the ‘oppressors’ as the rich (by global standards) non-oikophobic westerners and the ‘oppressed’ as everyone else.
And they are so arrogant that they are willing to form an ‘alliance’ with anyone.
Classical liberals, conservatives, and all those who don’t think that European civilisation must die a slow death must wake up to what is happening and reverse rampant multiculturalism, open borders, extreme welfarism, and the self imposed two tier system that treats native westerners as second class citizens in the name of ‘addressing historical injustices’.
Several things to say about this idiotic agitprop.
First, it's a political impossibility to repeal the 19th Amendment in the United States. It's very unpopular, except in niche online communities that aren't representative or big. Further, two thirds of both House and Senate would have to ratify (including a lot of Democrats plus all Republicans), and then three fourths of the states, half of which vote Democrat. Zero left-leaning states and at most half of right-leaning states would ratify, at best.
That means raising the issue has other purposes, and the most obvious political one is to make the right look like anti-woman extremists in order to motivate the left-wing female and feminist vote in opposition. Another purpose is more divisive agitprop against our otherwise unifiable movement.
Second, that divisive agitprop is a real thing either way. The message trains people, especially men but also some women, in the target messaging demographic to blame their problems on an external locus of control, women voters (who skew left). This furthers unhealthy, divisive, and Woke politics (on both sides) and disunifies our movement and country further.
Third, it's likely a grifter alt-media game to assess support for an agitation position the grifter might then adopt. Being thought-led around by edgy but soulless grifters with no principles who act like political weathervanes for clicks and ratings is killing us as a population.
Fourth, in polls, native support for repealing the 19th is definitely under 25% and likely under 20% overall in the US overall, plausibly lower if the rubber hits the road, so it's not a popular-vote initiative at all, but something else, including wielding state power in pursuit of political outcomes. This isn't "we, the people"; it's something else.
Fifth, even in the subpopulations where it is more popular, like traditionalist right-wing religious conservatives, it still only polls at about 40% organic support, so it's a fringe issue being presented like it's significant. But this raises a big question.
Last, Tim's poll is returning ~78-80% "yes," which doesn't match polling in any relevant political population, suggesting his audience is either badly not representative (big audience capture implications) or (very likely) botted to manufacture the appearance of niche and trendy popularity for an unpopular issue.
So, why this? Why now? Why from him? Who benefits?
Judge John McConnell just issued a sweeping ruling blocking Trump’s immigration and asylum policies.
This is the same judge AFL exposed for failing to recuse from the Trump spending freeze case — despite previously leading a nonprofit that received $128M in federal funding.
🧵
I returned to Monticello, the home of our third president, Thomas Jefferson. I’ve visited many times before; my last visit was about 15 years ago, when I decided I could no longer tolerate their increasingly hostile, woke narrative about Jefferson.
The NGO that operates Monticello is an example of institutional capture. It has embraced and actively promotes a woke agenda. Several friends of mine have come away with similar conclusions after visiting.
That said, I still encourage people to visit this remarkable historic site. Monticello remains one of the most important and fascinating places in American history. Visitors, especially parents, should simply be aware of what they may encounter here.
The average Westerner gets stuck on fairness and “What if the roles were reversed?” But that misses the framing trick, and the whole purpose is to use pathos to mobilize rescuers to "do the work" of left activism.
A left-oriented cultural frame has already pre-assigned who counts as victim and who counts as guilty before the facts are examined. The frame is pervasive because activists have installed it in media, education, HR, mandatory DEI training, etc.
In Karpman Drama Triangle terms, the frame locks in the roles first: victim, persecutor, rescuer. The goal is to activate rescuers, here the police, to “do the work” of left praxis. Once those roles are set, evidence and fairness arguments arrive too late. The rescuer has already been morally mobilized to defend the victim as framed by activists.
Pity sells this frame by disarming logos with pathos. The story is presented as suffering to be relieved, which moves the audience into pathos before logos. Pity, guilt, and moral urgency soften resistance and make the frame feel self-evidently humane.
Once the frame is accepted emotionally, the rescuer experiences himself as protecting the vulnerable. The political frame bypasses logos and installs itself as conscience. Reality is inverted with this left frame. Attack becomes compassion, punishment becomes protection, and ideological enforcement becomes moral duty. The purpose of coercion is also inverted: it is no longer experienced as an attack on the accused, but as rescue of the victim.
I was wondering why are they making a big deal about a job that will be finished in under a month then it hit me, confession through projection. If the CA dems ran this project it would take months or years. They fully expected a empty pool all summer at the peak of DC tourism. The idea it would be done on time never even entered their minds.
🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: State Department & UN ties to Armed Queers SLC leader now confirmed 🚨🚨
First, credit to @SKDoubleDub33 for the crucial tip, PLEASE follow, they'll be doing a podcast on this soon.
Here’s what you need to know:
🔻 Armed Queers SLC is under investigation for possible foreknowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
🔻 Their leader, Ermiya Fanaeian, was recognized by a State Dept–affiliated NGO, Utah Global Diplomacy, as a recipient of the "7 for 17" Award for advancing the UN's 17 Goals
🔻 Utah Global Diplomacy has since scrubbed Fanaeian's presence from their website. Unknown when this purge happened. The receipts remain.
Patience as I pull this thread together.
Florida processes more than 10 million votes in a matter of hours.
California takes days — or sometimes even weeks — to count the votes.
It’s pathetic — and it’s corrosive to our civic culture.
This is exactly what I’m talking about. The left is running a coordinated insurgency in our country as we speak and this fat moron can get on a video and say how he hopes to be the worst kind of terrorist, yet nothing happens.
What are we doing, guys?
Open up a Task Force right now to track, disrupt, and arrest these terrorists that are trying to ruin our great country.
It’s wild that this hasn’t already been created…
There are also a lot of people who also don’t realize:
—the majority of residential property tax revenue taken by local governments is non-homestead residential properties
—homestead property tax revenue is a fraction of all property tax revenue which also includes commercial properties
—property tax revenue is a fraction of total revenue for large counties
—property tax revenue taken by local governments has nearly doubled in the past eight years
This is the House Democrat leader congratulating a guy who defended the World Trade Center bomber and volunteered for an Al Qaeda organization.
The level of cooked we are can’t be quantified.
Legacy Media did not want us to know about Henry Nowak’s murder.
Legacy Media did not want us to see the Henry Nowak murder.
Legacy Media did not want people calling for justice for the Henry Nowak murder.
But Legacy Media does not control X.
We are the Media now.
Be loud.
We're going to have to get out heads out of our asses in the West and get serious about Jihad.
We also need to sit the Leftists down and get them to understand what happened in Iran to their lot in 1979 when they helped the Muslims take over.
One of the pseudoscientific claims at the heart of the Nazi Experiment was the belief that values and character are extensions of blood (genetics). It even had a name, "the myth of the blood," and was recorded with gravitas in a book, The Myth of the 20th Century.
This book was the second most important book in the Nazi library, after Mein Kampf, and because MK sucks and rants and rambles, it was probably more widely read. While most Nazis on the street didn't believe much of it, almost all the Nazi elite did. Your typical Nazi/German citizen on the street likely believed some of the basics of the "myth of the blood," though.
The statement of the myth of the blood, per Rosenberg, the Chief Ideologist of the Third Reich, who wrote the book, was meant to be a rejection of the Christian idea "as the faith, so the man." The replacement belief was, "as the man, so the belief." Rosenberg's thesis was that character traits and values are direct consequences of the blood.
The result of this belief is that if you have the right blood, you will have the right values and character, no matter how viciously they present themselves in the world. He says this explicitly. On the other hand, if you have mixed blood, you will have degenerated or even warring core values.
Rosenberg's claim about Jews is the same one Hitler made: They preserve their own blood and thus evil values while demanding views and policies that end up watering down the blood of nobler races, thus throwing them into chaos. This isn't just insane, pseudoscientific, and total projection, not to mention vile; it's also completely wrong and a direct refutation in practice of the ridiculous "myth of the blood" concept.
Jews allow intermarriage and conversion, which means they don't "protect their blood." The sons and daughters of Jewish women are Jewish, no matter whose blood got mixed in. Any Jewish convert (not that it's an easy process) is Jewish, no matter their blood. Their whole religion and culture is based on character rooted in belief: as the belief, so the person.
This pseudoscientific, idiotic idea of blood-based values is the main idea we're still dealing with today when people go looking for Jewish bloodlines in everyone from Karl Marx to Seth Dillon in order to accuse them of implementing "Jewish supremacy." The claim is that their "Jewish" blood is determinative of their character and values. Most of the things that blame Jews for everything you can think of are based in this idiotic logic.
If you've heard Communism is Jewish, for example, the argument for that is not that it's religiously Jewish or anything of the sort, although sometimes they do appeal to twisted takes on heretical strains of Kabbalah and mysticism. It's that Jewish people who were in no ways at all religiously Jewish were the main thinkers (which is at best partially true and mostly untrue). The claim is that the values associated with Jewish blood are what created Communism (even though the first Communist document in history, The Code of Nature, by Etienne-Gabriel Morelly, 1755, was written by a French tax official with no known Jewish heritage).
The point here is that they believe there are values associated with the blood. Who you were born as determines what you believe. If you had Chinese great-great grandparents, you have Chinese values. If you had Jewish great-great grandparents, you have "Jewish" values (which aren't even usually Jewish at all).
This belief is both evil and crackerjacks.
They're scripting the outrage.
A "Creator Brief" is being circulated to influencers telling them exactly what to say about Delaney Hall.
Rule 1: Don't call it a detention center. Call it a "concentration camp."
Rule 2: Don't call them detainees. Call them "captives."
Rule 3: Don't say people were arrested. Say they were "kidnapped" or "abducted."
Pre-written content hooks include: "Wake the fuck up America. We're officially Nazi Germany."
The brief provides four tiers of content creation (from "like and share" to "record a direct-to-camera video"), eight accounts to follow for updates, dozens of pre-selected video clips sorted by platform, and a word-for-word "Core Message" every creator is supposed to repeat.
It even tells creators to follow "guidance on Delaney from Detention Watch Network."
That's the same DWN with $7.2 million in assets and Ford Foundation funding. The same org that employs the main protest organizer, Jenny Garcia.
Foundation money funds the organizer. The organizer runs the protest. Then a content playbook gets distributed telling influencers which words to use and which clips to share.
That's not a grassroots movement.
Screenshot below.
Civilian action short-circuits the communist tactics. Their objective is to provoke an escalating GOVERNMENT response.
When civilians show up to counter them, it screws up their whole strategy.
That’s why the Proud Boys were treated like Al Qaeda by Democrat regimes.