People building SaaS products or apps who are struggling to create and scale content should seek partnerships with established influencers.
This way, you handle the technical side while outsourcing distribution. It is exhausting to create multiple accounts and keep getting zero views; good ideas are dying there.
Yesterday, I saw a video on Instagram of a developer who was outraged because the internet is full of people without technical backgrounds positioning themselves as AI experts.
His grievance was simple: in his view, that space should be occupied by technical people.
But there’s one thing he overlooked.
For years, a large portion of Brazilian developers weren't trying to build companies, create categories, or educate the market. They were trying to land remote jobs and earn in dollars.
And there is nothing wrong with that.
The problem lies in complaining now that others are filling the role of AI experts, precisely the space that many developers never tried to occupy.
I’m not saying that anyone who uses ChatGPT has suddenly become an expert. There are plenty of people selling hot air.
But I also see no issue with someone who has a history of entrepreneurship, market research, product creation, and strategic positioning starting to talk about AI.
Having a technical background might give you greater depth when building a tool.
But it doesn't automatically grant you the right to dominate the conversation, educate the market, or be recognized as an authority.
In the end, perhaps the frustration isn't really about the "fake experts."
Perhaps it stems from the fact that others realized sooner than the developers did that on the internet, authority isn't a job title waiting to be filled.
It is a space someone claims when they decide to show up, explain things, and take the risk of being judged.
What is happening in the US is insane.
We are seeing, in real time and openly, Trump using policy decisions to trade and profit from stocks in a global market that he himself directly influences.
He speaks openly about it as if it were normal and acceptable. Why aren't the people outraged by this?
My hypothesis was: can I create and monetize an app without creating social media content, generating traffic solely through SEO? My app launched five months ago, and I’ve had only one conversion.
I tried cutting the subscription price in half to check if price was the issue, but it wasn't. I’m still trying to figure out what the problem might be.
When the first humans appeared on the planet, they relied on hunting and agriculture to provide food and facilitate trade. That is how the world has always been.
You produce something to be consumed or traded, but what will happen when everyone becomes "vibecoders," influencers, and TikTok Shop sellers? What will the commerce of the future look like?
The number of foreigners engaging in sex tourism in South America is staggering, but Brazilian women are wise to it.
Some dream of marrying a foreigner, thinking they’ll have an easy life and never have to work again.
But others have realized they will simply be used by men who can't land a beautiful woman in their own countries.
I created a copycat of an American app here in Brazil. The owner of the original app found out and hired UGC creators to scale up traffic in Brazil so they wouldn't lose ground. The world is truly interconnected; a few years ago, they probably never would have found out.
The amount of explicit pornography on Twitter is staggering, and it’s striking how the reputations of wealthy, successful people aren't tarnished by sharing the same platform and posting here.
And above all, how is it that Apple doesn't take issue with this?
@google has officially disabled my work email; I use it to manage two Firebase apps and five domains in GSC.
I have already sent several messages requesting a review, but the response is always the same.
It appears my email have been created by a computer program or bot