Sun King

Keen naturist. Often tweet on the subject, among other things

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@akunnaoma @chinazaa14 https://t.co/73Ssh3g8U0

[AKUNNAYA @akunnaoma]

I just realized you can copy a GIF by simply holding it down and tapping “Copy Video Link.”
Why am I just discovering this?

[Lewis.B.Rendell Official @Lewisrendell1]

This is what actual organisation looks like.

The Order of The Natives aren’t another talking shop or political party that will fold the second it gets a platform.

They’re a private members’ organisation for the Celtic-Germanic people of these islands. Full stop.

While the establishment keeps pushing change they have no mandate for, and while the usual routes of “trust the process” or “vote harder” continue to fail us, they’re building something real.

Proper meeting places for our people, the kind our ancestors used. Kinship, community, and continuity in the real world, not just online.

They’re also pushing for formal recognition of native Britons as the indigenous people of Britain and creating the structures (forums, business networks) so people who share the cause can actually work together and hold power to account outside the system that has no interest in our survival.

If you mean it when you say you want to protect our heritage, culture and ancestry for our children and those not yet born, follow them, repost this, and get behind it.

https://t.co/NWfcQMrRo2

Stop waiting for someone else to do it. Kinsmen. 🫡

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@BasilTheGreat @Cai_ParryJones Streisand just joined the Senedd.
😂😂

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@HenryStephens80 @JohnCleese …all claiming to be non binary.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@JohnCleese Plus ça change…
From 1929:

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@StevenScrase @brianstwitfeed No, they don’t give a shit about the kids. This is to force adults to hand over ID to track their every move generally and, in the case of online marketplaces, specifically to grab more tax.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@StrategicWin5 @mtracey Tell that to Lucy Connelly. Why did Hermer intervene in her case?

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@StrategicWin5 @mtracey Hahahhhhahahahahahahaha!!!
Oh, shit, you’re actually serious.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@BROKENBRITAIN0 @Crissi666 At best he is saying he’s not a fighter, just working to a script. So it’s all fake, then?

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@JebraFaushay WHOSE HANDS ARE ON THEIR SHOULDERS!!?
😳

[Joe @MrJoeGooch]

The John Lewis Christmas advert is better with a voiceover

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@ripvanwinkle666 @JohnCleese Gandhi wasn’t much like him either.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

That is true in England as well. There is a certain level of physical contact to which you consent when you take part. There is, however, a limit. Whether the line is crossed is not always clear, but in this case (in my view) there is a clear case for saying it was well exceeded.
The question of the extent to which a person can consent to serious assault has been an issue for a long time and includes scenarios such as pranks and horseplay all the way up to the most extreme BDSM. R v Brown was an early leading case and not for those with delicate stomachs. The law has placed limits on the extent to which consent removes criminal liability. There is a public policy argument for criminalising extreme violence, even where all participants are up for it.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@zinrose95 @Lionel_Lingard Yes, I know. I was pointing out what the position would be in England, as I don’t know what the position might be in Spain. I note the police have released a statement suggesting they are investigating Owono for involuntary manslaughter.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

Legally (had it happened in England- I don’t know about Spain) intention to wound but not kill where the wounding leads to death can still be murder. You can have the intent to do something without wanting it to come about.
Example. I decide to kill the next person to walk through a doorway. I set a booby trap capable of inflicting fatal injury. It turns out to be a child. I didn’t want it to be a child and had no intention of killing that specific individual. But I intentionally did an act in setting the trap that could kill. That intent is enough.
Example two. I intend to shoot person A but miss and kill person B. I did not intend to kill person B. It was the last thing I wanted to do. I have still murdered person B. I intended to kill. I killed. I’m guilty. If
Owono intended to injure (and there is prima facie evidence of that) and fatal injury was foreseeable (more than arguable), then he may well have a case to answer. Whether it can be proved would now seem to be in the hands of the court. I notice they are proposing a charge of involuntary manslaughter, which is easier to prove than murder.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@MediaSOI You are wrong. The Bradford study found it to be 13 times the usual rate of birth defects.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

Fuck off. Moments beforehand, he was chimping out. he was ready for violence. He went out to injure with knee and fist, then strutted away. He totally intended to take the man out. He might not have wanted him to die, but he intended the injury that killed him. That is murder. He should already be in a cell awaiting charge.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@Lionel_Lingard @zinrose95 In England, if person A intends to do GBH to person B and person B dies as a result of the injury, that is classed as murder. You can intend an act without wanting the consequence to occur.

[David Collier @mishtal]

It is Islamophobia Awareness Month. Time to remember the Manchester Arena attack. Where an Islamic terrorist murdered 22 during an Ariana Grande concert killing.

A security guard saw him as suspect - but was too concerned about being branded Islamophobic to take real action.

[Sun King @BriefLess]

@QcWynter
Thoughts and prayers are with you at this difficult time.

https://t.co/9uIeQKCpto