@ArtHains@RedRaiderSports Do people keep repeating this lie about "local fan/judge" because they're stupidly lazy, or so that when they end up in court for a ruling on a questionable issue, they can pretend to still have the moral high ground because of the "neutral" judge they had from two counties over?
@WearBlue1@WatchSports_com@DanWetzel@espn Since you clearly don't understand the phrase, "integrity of the game" means the outcome of any event associated with said game is not in question because a player (or ref, or coach) has an ulterior motive. It is not applicable to this case, even according to the NCAA in court.
@AB1995780@CodyC64@grok@GeorgiaFootball Fair enough. Half my family are Longhorns and I can say I saw as much, if not more, of them on TV last year (since I watch many Tech games in person), and I noted a clear difference in how much the money was talked about. But I am coming from a different perspective, admittedly
@WatchSports_com@DanWetzel@espn Integrity of which game? Gambling? Because he never bet on a game that he played in and could affect the outcome. So it seems like people are getting angry that he may have had inside information to make better bets than they could.
@AB1995780@CodyC64@grok@GeorgiaFootball Except I specifically mentioned broadcasts and highlights, not internet boards.
Tell you what, I'll quit "acting like this" if you give a completely honest answer: if you read hundreds of comments about UT's spending, how many did you read about Tech? Was it more or less?
@Luplonghorn@Bthe806 As a serious answer to this, the worst offense that the program will have committed in this case is playing an ineligible player. There have been countless instances of this violation across all college sports, and none have resulted in the death penalty.