My little toy paid EXTRA for you to see an EXTRA long video of me putting her in her place.
She is a little toy who loves to fuck her pussy and cage herself up 😏
She says she has no limits….what should she do for me next?
@MattWalshBlog This is… by far the worst tweet of your career to me.
Elected officials. Politicians. Scientists. People you’re supposed to trust… and we’re called “obsessive?”
Rape gangs are completely detestable.
Touch grass you fucking nerd.
@alleytopfiles@RealCandaceO So… Candace asks for the clip and they make a montage…?
I mean….
Is this a joke?
Blake said people would claim it’s edited…
….so he edits it?…
🤡 🤡 🤡
@NihiloX@RealCandaceO So… Candace asks for the clip and they make a montage…?
I mean….
Is this a joke?
Blake said people would claim it’s edited…
.. so he edits it?…
🤡 🤡 🤡
@daltonwelbern So… Candace asks for the clip and they make a montage…?
I mean….
Is this a joke?
Blake said people would claim it’s edited…
.. so he edits it?…
🤡 🤡 🤡
TPUSA publicly backed Candace. Charlie "You don't act like this as a leader Ben, this is not how leaders act. You don't do that. If someone is on your payroll, someone your building a company with, you don't go in front of donors and friends and bash someone "
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman Dude. Baron redacted it because baron thought it would be a big deal if released. I did not. So no. Not according to me. Factually a big deal based on the evidence presented.
If it’s redacted. It’s a big deal. Factually. Not an opinion.
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman Uhm… sorry but can you show me where I said they’re not a big deal? You’re losing it my guy.
The fact that they’re redacted is what tells me they’re a big deal. Like factually a big deal. Not an opinion.
And I don’t believe it’s to protect his source. He would’ve said that.
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman Again.
Who decided it’s redacted to protect a source?
You agree the corners shouldn’t be a big deal but would like to combat it by saying they arnt a big deal?
are you ok dude? You’re incoherent at this point… or trolling… I can’t tell.
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman I’m not insinuating anything. I’m clearly saying that redacting all 4 edges of a photo is sketchy.
He didn’t say the redaction was for a source, YOU did AND you’re defending it.
Also let’s be real honest. His source would be perfectly fine.
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman Because we’re all adults here. I don’t need mom holding her fingers over my eyes to hide the graphic part of the movie. Especially not all 4 edges of a photo like his source is an anaconda wrapped around the victim. It’s sketch and insulting and wildly ironic from baron.
@CucarachaBadger@BlakeBednarz@baroncoleman So say that? Does saying that somehow reveal your source?
I guess I have to state the obvious here but when you hide shit you look sketchy… and the irony in that is unbelievable considering this is baron…
@JT_Lines@AHostetler9 Can I jump in here? The value is the fact that burns is on a skid, sure, but the level of competition is worlds apart.
Malott has statistically garbage take down defense against what level of wrestlers?
Burns finish in 2/3/4/5 is +1900/+3000/+4750/+7500 respectively
Value.
@teameffujoe@leahfiles I’ll believe Charlie’s own voice, captured over years, pushing the importance of motherhood and early childhood development over “trust me bro, his will named his wife”
Mainly because there’s ZERO credible evidence of your claim beyond “trust me bro, it’s in his will”.
@hoist_@LeroneMurphy He threw more total strikes and landed more significant strikes in rd 1 and rd 2.
Add the point deduction.
Explain how Mosvar won the decision. I’m genuinely curious and I’m happy to have my mind changed. But I need logic not just “go watch the fight bro”.
@Juuzou_710@BMikaas@LeroneMurphy Murphy had more significant strikes in rd 1 and 2. Round 3 was the only real question due to the takedown at the end of the round.
With the point deduction it shoulda been a draw at best. Look at the stats.