These sweet summer babies think that city of yes is going to magically make this existing home into a condo and that they are going to be able to buy or rent it. This is not going to happen. How can people be so deceived?
This is W. 11th St. in the West Village. The West Village is a landmarked neighborhood. All of the changes of city of yes which will be crammed down our throat did not apply to these politically connected areas. @NYCPlanning deceptive marketing worked on you. 🧸
@fuelgrannie@rvljones I keep telling them I bought a house and I'm not affected by it really (other than property taxes) but they still can't get it through their heads that I dont want to see working-class of NYC be sold for their trash urban fantasy.
There are three problems with that.
First, when real estate investors see an opportunity for profit, they will take it. TALK about upzoning an area where there is a good economy and strong demand, and prices will immediately go up. Speculators will often "capture" the increased value of the land before the upzoning goes through.
Second, the least expensive form of multi-family housing is the four- or five-story walkup.
Third, other forms of multi-family housing are more profitable. In NYC, that's the luxury tower. The most profitable there is the super-luxury, super-profitable supertall. It's very expensive to build and requires a lot of capital, but it makes the land unaffordable for less expensive development.
Speak for your own district. @CMRitaJoseph relentlessly pursues street safety in our district. This week a school in our community got a safe crossing.
The @NYCCouncil, which does not promote street safety in any real way, is hearing a bill to *register all e-bikes* Dec 11
Reminder that stuff people complain about w e-bikes, “mopeds” etc is already illegal
So what are we doing here @NYCSpeakerAdams? https://t.co/tj6iReqLxU
@DruidofNecro@sam_d_1995@nick_garber 🤯 It took decades of advocacy to get a tot lot on gov’t owned land. You generalize. Our community has added thousands of housing units with hundreds more under construction. Again- we are against incentivizing demolitions of existing diverse high quality historic housing stock.
An activist just referred to people against #CityOfYes as “pro-segregationists”. A white activist, I’ll add. He was followed by a black New Yorker who asked for the proposal to be reworked and referred to the “arrogance” of the plan.
💯 Nothing in #CityOfYes address the biggest housing issue for NYC families, lack of family sized units. CoYH is going to give us a ton of market rate builder-grade studios, and tear down some beautiful neighborhood-defining historic structures with it.
The amount of knowingly false promises made leading people to believe that there’s suddenly going to be affordable, family-sustaining housing stemming from #CityofYes has been demoralizing to witness. Today, it’s a misleading ad in Haitian Creole 🇭🇹 targeting neighbors.
@crystalrhudson @mihirzaveri CM Hudson is part of the housing solution and is a fierce advocate for constituents including seniors who are facing deed theft. Damn.
@DruidofNecro@sam_d_1995@nick_garber In Ditmas Park, #OperationGig hosted over 250 concerts this year, all on private land, all open to the public, all paying working musicians a living wage, all funded by donations. We have no parks in Ditmas Park, just 0.10 parcels of land.
At a November 4 meeting on city of yes, one attendee opposed to the plan as written was leaving at 4 AM to be a Harris campaign poll watcher in Pennsylvania. But go on calling us Trump supporters. Helpful.
Middle class NYers standing up to big developers are being portrayed as Trump supporters. Did you know the date is visible here? 😢 Why the bogus polls and offensive stereotypes. Wow us with a plan that doesn’t exempt the politically-connected and destroy our neighborhoods.
Middle class NYers standing up to big developers are being portrayed as Trump supporters. Did you know the date is visible here? 😢 Why the bogus polls and offensive stereotypes. Wow us with a plan that doesn’t exempt the politically-connected and destroy our neighborhoods.
@TweetBenMax Not surprised to see the vitriol against Speaker Adams. Reminds me of when Dan Grodnik used a photo of Donald Trump in his presentation as a scare tactic towards those who dare oppose city of yes. I found that insincere and insulting.
@nick_garber Historic districts were never going to be impacted by City of Yes for Housing. Brooklyn Heights, Park Slope historic District were always protected by their landmark status. @nyclandmarks
@sam_d_1995@nick_garber Once again, attempts to paint reasonable New Yorkers as Maga because we don’t want every corner of our neighborhood bulldozed and replaced with an apartment building in communities with zero public space is not correct and I think you know that.
@BLASTorBLESS I ask with zero snark, why? Why mess with blocks of 2 family homes in Flatbush when we have zero parks, zero public green space, and replace them w apartment blocks that go right up to the sidewalk (no trees, no grass), all for a few non-family sized apartments? What’s the play?
We will never have the time for Twitter expertise to compete against the well organized loud voices on this platform, who encourage city of yes for housing to be passed without any edits.