@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 By looking at as many other sources as I could on the matters and verifying that the information in them is consistent, which it is.
To be honest, you lost this debate the second you tried denying reality.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 You literally cannot accept that this information is true but also aren't presenting any alternative to believe in. You simply are closed minded and lazy. It's pretty easy to prove something wrong if it is.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 Like, Do you realize how stupid saying "prove your sources right" are in the context of an event with easily observable consequences? You obviously are uneducated and it's showing.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 You can't just look at a report and accuse it of being false without evidence, especially when multiple sources report on the subject in hand. These articles are valid evidence to disprove your ideas, you just can't admit that.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 (2) You genuinely have such a ridiculous amount of audacity and such a lack of self awareness. Every single reply from you gets dumber and dumber yet you insist that I'm the idiot here. The more you don't admit your wrong on anything the dumber you look yourself.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 It IS your job to prove me wrong because nothing else HAS. Everything said in those articles is not only true but undeniable fact. Their is nothing that disproves them (which their would be if the facts were false). You haven't even proven any of YOUR own claims.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 Wanna fact check them? Feel free. If youโre intelligent enough to feel curiosity, you can put in effort to do research yourself with peer reviewed publications and reports. But if you wish to stay ignorant then thatโs your choice to make.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 (3) If youโre truly as intelligent as you think you are, youโll start to actively search out information that challenges your ideas as opposed to spewing talking points you obviously got from someone else.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 (2) Inflation and labour costs do increase prices, but not to the extent to which many of the articles outline - those are results of people trying to monopolize inelastic goods (usually land / housing) by purchasing tones of it.
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 (2/2)
Lobbying to prevent things from being affordable (if your curious there are plenty more examples):
https://t.co/0fKKKQFmsy
https://t.co/FS1Rgz01Nx
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 Can you just acknowledge the fact that I have already proven you wrong on your main point? I've explained why the existence of billionaires is a result of market failure and how they infringe upon the quality of life of the middle class.
to remind you:
https://t.co/WvQTEcrUoi
@AT7987575983718@JackWilson4YOu@gurgx3 2. I could list several examples. Price gouging on necessary goods, Artificially Raising Property value beyond affordability, lobbying to prevent law to make things more affordable. Generally obtaining more capital than you need - which increases demand and thus increases prices.