@JustSlaythe@IsThisASpoiler@CringeAlarmMR@bringmethemulah It does wayyyy too much. It cleanses, gives damage boost, does delayed extra damage on each hit, buffs movement speed, heals over time, and more I’m sure I forgot.
The team-up with Rogue only benefited Rogue. I don’t know people who banned Gambit purely because of that teamup.
@JustSlaythe@IsThisASpoiler@CringeAlarmMR@bringmethemulah So the dude I replied to, who claimed “Yall just talk and dont play the game” is incorrect.
Luna has skill expression in her aim. Her damage is crazy, but besides that she’s fine. Whitefox is also so easily countered by just having a brain. Gambit is press W and win still.
@JABmegv@CringeAlarmMR Literally just false. Phoenix was nerfed to B tier. She does less damage than Hela now. Gambit is now not a permanent ban because his ult is super kitable now.
@IamCruella_@CringeAlarmMR Namor buff is okay for Dive meta. Gives more ways to fight back.
The Elsa buff is a nothing burger.
CnD just has more self sustain in neutral. Her real value was her Ult, as she was the last true ult merchant support.
if you look around at everything happening and your conclusion as to why people are becoming more radicalized is still some shit like “andrew tate” and “podcasters” you should be wearing a helmet 24/7
A lot of people in the anti-abortion camp are criticizing this post. And I get it. I’m not countering them. But one thing I haven’t seen anyone say, at least not explicitly, is how little epistemic humility this guy, and people like him, have. And this complete lack of epistemic humility results in them playing God and making inapt comparison—comparisons they cannot possibly make because they cannot rightly evaluate the two alternatives.
This man and his wife were informed that their child would have a series of medical difficulties, both physical and mental. We know that about Down Syndrome. We know that by almost any metric this is a “harder” life than someone without any such condition. But these people turn around and say “and, thus, it would be better for the child if the child actually just died now.”
But they can’t know that. They can’t actually compare existence with Down Syndrome to non-existence/death, because they don’t know what the latter entails. In order to rightly and ably compare two things, you have to know enough about them. We don’t know enough about death to ably compare it to life—even life with difficulties. So one cannot truly and reasonably say “death is better than living with Down Syndrome.”
It would be like me asking “do you prefer to eat apples or smoogaboogaloogas?” Of course, you don’t know what a smoogaboogalooga is, so you would reply “uh, I don’t know what that is, so I can’t compare it to an apple.” That’s epistemic humility. This guy and his wife have none of that, because they decided that death (which they cannot understand and appreciate) is better than life.
But even now I’m being charitable. I’m assuming a lack of epistemic humility when in reality they weren’t deciding what was “best” for the child (death vs. life). They were deciding what was best for themselves. And they decided killing their child was best for themselves.