@28lawlz I’d want to see evidence it’s Claire, we haven’t seen Claire use burner accounts before and she’s been very up front and vocal on her main. There is no reason for her to use one and it seems like a weird leap in logic to try and pin it on her.
@Foxxh3art@MeowskullsToes Ok? But how is that evidence of anything other than that he was hired to work with her. We’ve seen the testimony’s that prove that wasn’t malicious
@MadAmericanLad@houseofenters@elizywizy He admitted in his words, that his own issue with Gryphon was that he tweets at “3am” and needs to be brought down to size. He wasn’t invited to the wedding because of the abuse. Also the whole raising Claire in a cult that he was a leader in
@MadAmericanLad@houseofenters@elizywizy He also admitted he lied in a audio recording about the grooming, along with audio of him verbally abusing his daughter
@RavenStarMedia@aardvark_gglol@28lawlz@Anoney_Snufftan@luckyspeedster The reason I get so heavily involved is because of Claire. As a grooming victim myself I just find this concept of ignoring the request of the potential victim to be uncomfortable. I don’t think any of us could say for sure she was groomed, but Claire has made her voice clear
@RavenStarMedia@aardvark_gglol@28lawlz@Anoney_Snufftan@luckyspeedster My argument is, if Claire was groomed, that isn’t for the internet to plaster everywhere without her consent. You shouldn’t be posting her trauma openly in a Google document unless that is something she wants, or you serve to make things worse for her
@SigningWhale4_2@Punking_86 Well the argument stands that people believe the person they collaborated with was also falsely cancelled. It’s an argument within an argument