Buddy:)

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@TheDangerTaco @gavintraa KC vs NRG vs Falcons LAN Placements
Avg with EWC/without EWC

KC: 1st 8th (1st) 4th
Avg: 3.5/4.33
NRG: 4th 4th (8th) 1st
Avg: 4.25/3
Falcons: 6th 1st (3rd) 2nd
Avg: 3/3

Technically falcons have the best placements if you just look at the numbers.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@TheBopPops KC 4-3 Falcons

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops How am I mad when you feel the need to like your own posts and use emojis to mask your anger? Also, since you clearly struggle with counting and tabulating data, NRG's record against EU at RLCS majors is currently 7W-8L. You lied once again.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops Once again, everything I stated a month ago doesn't account for worlds. Your obsession with me is pretty sad. You decided to bring up the old debate to cope with your loss. Keep liking your own comments since it clearly makes you feel better. When are you going to stop replying?

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops You're embarrassing yourself. I know you're liking your own post because you lost the argument a month ago. Everything I said in August did not account for worlds. You're moving the goalpost to convince yourself that you were actually right. Good try, better luck next time.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops 1. You thought nrg/g2 has a winning record against eu, which is false.
2. You thought geng almost never lost to g2 yet they only won 5/9 series.
3. My above statements were objectively correct. There was no evidence to put nrg above vitality before worlds. You’re acting foolish

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops If you were to compare medicine on two different patients to see which one is better, would that be effective? Should you instead have the same person take both to see which is better? Likewise, you compare LAN results because the conditions are the same.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops If you’re saying that the two teams basically placed the same, how about you dig deeper into their record for the tie breaker. It’s not that difficult if you’re unbiased.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops It’s easier to place higher simply based on the format, but nrg lost in playoffs.

Okay, then look at Swiss results. Vitality haven’t lost a series in Swiss and nrg has lost 2.

Nrg lost in swiss/group stage. Vitality is perfect in bo5s.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops When did I say that nrg didn’t have similar placements on lan? Due to vitality having a better placement on average, they should be rated higher. If you want to be that specific, vitality is the only team to be undefeated in Swiss. 6-0 versus NRG’s 6-2.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops Yes, AFL does do a better job at finding top 4, but at the end of the day, they lost to KC. If they beat KC they would’ve gotten rewarded with team secret because upper bracket teams face lower bracket teams.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops So now you retract your claim on “almost never lost that matchup” considering they had a 55ish% win rate???

Vitality is better than dig because they have a better average placement at lans. The same reason why vitality is currently higher rated than nrg.

[Buddy:) @Buddyakal]

@craftygamers411 @Zekfallen @TheBopPops How do you know most people do not care about EWC results? Can you quantify the difference?

How is it statistically more likely nrg places worse due to the format?