⚽️ Receive, turn, escape. Which first touch works with a defender close by?
Explore the Joner Football App with first-touch practice in mind: https://t.co/VSskOOxhws
درس تدريبي | Training Masterclass
Build Up From The Back
Overlap & Finishing ⚽⚡
-من المؤكد أنه لا تكمن جودة التداخل الخارجي في سرعة الانطلاق فقط ولكن تكمن في التزامن الدقيق بين حركة اللاعب وتوقيت الوصول إلى منطقة الجزاء بحيث يصبح اللاعب في وضع تكتيكي وجسدي يسمح له بالتسجيل
The guy who created Squid Game lost eight teeth from stress while making Netflix billions. His cut of the upside was zero dollars.
That's the deal Netflix gives everyone. They pay around 110% of your budget upfront, take the IP, and keep every dollar your hit earns for the rest of time. Your show can be the biggest thing on the planet and you get the same check as if it flopped.
Ben Affleck and Matt Damon just broke that deal.
Their studio, Artists Equity, sold The Rip to Netflix in January with a clause Netflix had never accepted before. They took less money upfront in exchange for a bonus if the movie performed in its first 90 days. It pulled 112 million views in six weeks. The bonus hit. And they split it with the crew, so the grips and gaffers got checks because a streaming movie did numbers.
Animals, the one Netflix is promoting here, is the next film under that structure. Affleck wrote the lead for Damon, lost him to Nolan's Odyssey, and just played the part himself rather than delay the shoot. When you own the studio, recasting the lead is a decision you make in the mirror.
Netflix said yes because they had to. Every other studio is chasing franchises, so the handful of people who still make prestige adult dramas suddenly have pricing power. Affleck and Damon took the Silicon Valley trade, lower salary for equity, and ran it in the one industry that spent 15 years stripping equity out of talent deals.
Hollywood lost its backend when streaming killed box office points. These two are quietly rebuilding it.
Master these 5 physical attributes to level up your fitness 🏋️♂️
⚡ Agility
🏃 Endurance
💪 Strength
💥 Power
🧘 Flexibility
Which attribute is the hardest to build?
🚨 SAQ - que tipo de treino é esse
Não é tática.
Não é condução com bola.
Não é corrida contínua.
É preparação física específica de futebol:
velocidade, agilidade e rapidez. Isoladas.
### O que é
Circuito segmentado com cones.
Cada faixa trabalha uma qualidade neuromuscular.
Oito blocos:
agilidade, velocidade, aceleração, stamina, flexibilidade dinâmica, força, potência e mudança de direção.
Setup mínimo.
Fácil de copiar.
Lugar na semana: pré-temporada, aquecimento estruturado ou bloco isolado de físico.
Não no treino tático principal.
### Por que separado da bola
Mais repetições de qualidade.
Sem a decisão tática atrapalhando o gesto puro.
É a mesma lógica desta série:
primeiro o estímulo isolado.
Depois bola, oposição e contexto.
### Onde isso segura o que já pesquisamos
Controle orientado pede corte e reaceleração.
Sem COD, a leitura certa chega atrasada.
Half-space pede ataque ao espaço no metro certo.
Isso é aceleração de 5 a 15 metros.
Timing de ruptura pede sair do quase parado para a velocidade máxima.
É a partida deitada: recuperação e explosão.
Contrapressão vive em 5 a 6 segundos.
Isso é RSA. Os shuttles treinam exatamente isso.
O fast attack 2v2→3v2 do Dubai FC dura 3 a 6 segundos.
Sem potência, a decisão não vira ação.
A ponte mais clara é a ativação por estações do Sporting CP.
Mesmas qualidades.
Lá, circuito contínuo.
Aqui, faixa por faixa, para ensinar.
### Os recortes
SAQ não inventa conceito novo.
Explicitar a camada que sempre ficou implícita.
A ressalva é a de sempre:
pouca bola.
Futebol junta percepção, decisão e ação no mesmo segundo.
Isolar é necessário.
Sozinho, não basta.
### Leitura
Half-space, ruptura e contrapressão não são só ideia.
São aceleração, corte, potência e repetição de esforço.
A tática descreve o que fazer.
O SAQ decide se o jogador chega a tempo.
Seu microciclo tem bloco de motor ou só jogo posicional? 👇
20-year-old Messi against prime Manchester United in the UEFA Champions League semi-final 2008.
But I'm meant to believe he wouldn't have survived in the premier League
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET SELLING LIVE
Jordan Belfort gets 20 minutes with a $27M dairy owner who has never heard of him.
The ask doesn't come until minute 10.
Before that he just asks questions. The brothers. The father with the minority stake. What keeps him up at night.
The owner hands it over: China. 15% domestic share, an organic accreditation no other Australian company holds, and not one facility on the ground.
That's the wound. Belfort never sells into it.
Instead he shrinks the ask until saying no looks strange.
Not the whole account. Not fire your current broker. "I don't need to be the guy that takes you from 0 to 50. I want to be the guy that takes you from 50 to 500 million."
Then he does the risk math out loud. One small hedge. 30 days. Worst case you lose 1 basis point and fire him. Best case 25% and $27,000 saved on money already sitting there.
"Is that going to put you in the poor house?"
The owner says probably not. He just argued himself out of his own objection.
The real block comes anyway. Farming runs on trust. The banking relationship is 3 generations deep.
Belfort doesn't fight it. He loops back and rebuilds from scratch. Merchant bank since 1886. 3,500 employees he'll comb through by hand. Referrals only, never cold calls.
Then the same 6 words, over and over, all 22 minutes. Sound fair enough?
Near the end he says the ugly objection before the owner can: "If I asked for all your business right now, you'd say get out of here."
22 minutes of tape. Zero product detail. He never explains a single hedging instrument.
He wasn't selling a bank. He was selling 30 days.