Absolute cinema this chart looks primed asf !!
+ this already gave me $150 in BTCB just for holding 👏🏼
lore is also kinda insane, everything about $b-money makes sense to me.
Let’s get that bag
@theunipcs thank you for this gem 🙏 @metaversejoji thank your friendship and for bringing attention to this @wizardofsoho thank you for your mentorship!
$b-money dip buyers are going to end up being VERY, VERY happy soon enough
you can clown the drawdown all you want
the token still pays real Bitcoin to holders while you argue about the chart
no staking. no claiming. just hold
as i keep hammering:
this is not another picture coin
it is the one that stacks BTC while the market sleeps
max bid $b-moneythank me later IMO
$BMONEY on-chain, day 31. n = 437,328 transfers, 113,544 swaps, the 500 largest wallets traced end to end.
Supply is consolidating, not distributing: since Sep 8 the 500 largest wallets net bought $712K through the pool while every other wallet combined net sold $688K. The market as a whole netted +$24K --> the tokens simply changed hands, from small wallets to large ones.
213 of the 500 have never sold. They hold 364.7M tokens (37.6% of non-pool supply) at a volume-weighted entry of $3.68M market cap vs $4.82M now: in profit, not selling, 82 of them added this week.
Demand sits where the price is: net buying below $5.5M (+$298K), net selling at $5.5–7M (−$182K); 210 of the last 355 hours were spent at $4–5.5M.
Nobody farms the range at scale --> of 1,249 two-way traders since Sep 8, the 68 that bought the lows and sold the highs netted $67K combined. The only structural seller is the 1% tax contract (6.20 BTCB ≈ $502K since launch). Liquidity 1.79 BTCB ≈ $290K, never pulled. 10 wallet entities hold 15% of supply, the largest 4.7%.
Falsifiers I'm watching: the never-sold cohort starting to sell, top-500 net flow turning negative, LP being pulled. None so far.
@theunipcs@wizardofsoho@metaversejoji@cz_binance@8an1326@LiamJ2611@bmoneyonbnb
Descriptive on-chain analysis at wallet level. Not financial advice.
the thesis is not the candle.
1998: Wei Dai publishes b-money. anonymous cash. no banks. contracts without a king.
2008: Satoshi emails him. cites him first in the Bitcoin white paper.
2026: you can hold a token with that name and Bitcoin hits the wallet. not points. BTCB. every buy and sell feeds holders. no stake.
no claim. no lock.
that is the product.
LP burned. owner gone. pool still paying after two full cycles. $4M → $13M → $3M and the mechanism did not break.
the people who wanted a 24h trade left.
the people who wanted Bitcoin stayed.
most memes sell you a picture. this one sells you a stream of BTC while you wait.
I will not name what is coming. you will not need me to.
watch the holders. watch the Bitcoin landing. then watch the rest of it go public.
$b-money
CA: 0xf49725118cb0707b8706ffffe895f3ab16da7777
NFA. I just read the lore and the chain.
good to have @theunipcs back
the lock was unfair from the start. they wanted a Paid Partnership label on a post that wasn’t paid. he didn’t take the easy way out and lie on it.
while he was offline I kept thinking about how much his approach actually changed how I trade. he made holding real for me. not the “never sell anything” version. the version where you pick a narrative you actually believe in and sit with it when it’s ugly.
that’s what I took into bags like $b-money. conviction instead of flipping every candle.
welcome back, Bonk Guy. the timeline was worse without you.
X locked @theunipcs (Unipcs / Bonk Guy) over a Sep 13 post about Arc chain.
They’re requiring a Paid Partnership label on that one post before the account is unlocked.
That label would be false. The post was not a paid partnership. He has never done a paid partnership on that account.
So the choice is: apply a label that isn’t true, or stay locked and hope someone inside X actually reviews it.
That’s a bad precedent. If one organic crypto post gets forced into a paid-partnership box, how many more get the same treatment later?
X can be aggressive with crypto. This one is the wrong call.
@Support@X please review the lock on @theunipcs. The required label does not match the post.
If anyone here actually knows someone at X who can look at locked-account / paid-partnership flags, a ping would help. He may not be on the app for a while.