BugUnstuck

Stuck on a vuln? Get elite second eyes. Private collab rooms, exploit chaining, real impact. Built for serious bug bounty hunters. Finish the bug.

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

AI made baseline recon faster.
It also made it more uniform.
Most people are still running variations of:
Subfinder, Amass, assetfinder, https://t.co/xDLXMe3l7B, gau, waybackurls, httpx, nuclei, dnsx, naabu....

We’re building BugUnstuck Finder to go above that layer.
New angles.
Merged uncommon sources.
Frontier-focused discovery.

On a recent run, BugUnstuck pulled 1,962 unique hosts that every other tool in the comparison missed.

If you want to see the delta on a real target, send a private message to @BugUnstuck and we’ll send you a personalized result list.

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@ArobaseGiovanny People bringing up Georgina... I don't think Georgina is going to be jelous. You can clearly see the fatherly kindness from Ronaldo. Pretty sure he was looking at her through the eyes of a Father...

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@ViralVideos I would blast Cannibal Corpse. Good luck.

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@QuintenFrancois Unfortunately, KAST isn't accepted everyone. Can't top up Revolut with it, and a lot more businesses are blocking it... (even if you add it to ApplePay, you still can't use it on Revolut, for example).

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@NVIDIAGeForce #007FirstLightRTX

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

KithDB Phase 0.13 produced 308 active QC-confirmed candidate protein families from a 1.1M-protein corpus, including a 392-member hardened-novelty pool where 82.9% lack Pfam annotation at the gathering threshold. A UniRef50 cross-check shows the main signal is not “proteins absent from UniProt,” but a Pfam/family-annotation gap in known sequence space.

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

Kith Atlas update.

In ~48h, KithDB mapped 1.1M orphan proteins and confirmed 97 hidden protein families / 1,582 proteins.

The important part: 248 confirmed proteins have no Pfam annotation.

Top novelty signals so far:

• 3.40.190 histidine kinase-like candidates
• 2.40.160 esterase-like candidates
• 3.10.450 small cross-kingdom fold family

KithDB is becoming a searchable atlas of protein dark matter.
#ProteinDiscovery #Bioinformatics #ProteinDarkMatter

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

In ~24h, Kith mapped 1.1M orphan / no-Pfam proteins into ranked, testable hypotheses inside KithDB.

Then we validated the map and confirmed 21 hidden protein families and 400+ proteins across enzymes and structural scaffolds.

Protein dark matter is becoming searchable.

Kith by https://t.co/leAg9SLjbC

@GoogleDeepMind | @demishassabis | @uniprot @InterProDB | @emblebi

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

Kith, a new product from ManifoldMemory, turns unknown protein sequences into testable structural and functional hypotheses.

Instead of leaving “uncharacterized” proteins in the dark, Kith helps map protein dark matter into ranked, investigable candidates.

A step toward faster protein discovery. 🧬

#AI #Biotech #ProteinDiscovery #Bioinformatics #MachineLearningTrivia

@IsomorphicLabs, @GoogleDeepMind, @demishassabis

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

AlphaFold showed that the right learned approximation can make biological structure-space searchable.

I wonder if ManifoldMemory can help one layer earlier:

a proprietary latent memory that retrieves structural prototypes, remote fold neighbors, templates, and priors before an AlphaFold-like predictor runs.

Not “ManifoldMemory folds proteins.”

More like:

AlphaFold (@IsomorphicLabs) predicts structure. ManifoldMemory remembers fold-space.

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

Open-weight SOTA on LongMemEval-S.

ManifoldMemory + Qwen-3.6-27B (@Alibaba_Qwen) reached 91.6% on the 500-question split under our strict judge.

And ManifoldMemory + Gemma-4-31B-IT (@googlegemma) also reached 91.6%, tying the top open-weight result on our board.

That pushes past the public GPT-OSS-120B open-weight Hindsight row we track, while using much smaller readers.

Current open-weight lane:

ManifoldMemory + Qwen-3.6-27B — 91.6%
ManifoldMemory + Gemma-4-31B-IT — 91.6%
ManifoldMemory + Gemma-4-31B-IT (A3) — 89.4%
ManifoldMemory + Qwen-3.6-27B (K=48) — 89.2%
Hindsight + GPT-OSS-120B — 89.0%
ManifoldMemory + Gemma-4-31B-IT (v2.1) — 88.8%
ManifoldMemory + Qwen-3.6-27B (v2) — 88.6%
ManifoldMemory + Gemma-4-26B-A4B — 84.8%
Hindsight + GPT-OSS-20B — 83.6%
CoM + Qwen3-32B — 76.4%

The story is not “just use a bigger model.”

It is retrieval substrate, evidence contracts, temporal metadata, and reader geometry.

A 27B open-weight reader can now lead the public open-weight lane, and a 31B open-weight reader matches it, both clearing the tracked 120B-class public open-weight row when the memory engine around them is strong.

https://t.co/qEtXgEhUoD

[0x496 @gkhck_]

Evet sonunda hackerone triagerlarının bu işi bilmediklerini gösteren bir olay olmuş. Büyük bir çoğunluğu gerçekten çok kötüler. Lovable'ın "all reports" kavramı çok dikkat çekici, yani bu raporlara birden fazla triager bakmış olabilir. Artık bi aksiyon alınır umarım.

[H4x0r.DZ @h4x0r_dz]

To be secure in 2026 you have to shut down your bug bounty program on HackerOne.

Lovable got hacked because HackerOne's incompetent triage team closed multiple valid vulnerability reports starting February 22, 2026 as "intended behavior."

Poorly trained monkeys. Zero escalation to Lovable's security team. AI bots auto-closing critical findings.

The result? Public project chat history and source code were exposed for MONTHS until a researcher was forced to go public.

Two companies. Same platform. Same failure. Same lies.

ClickUp. Lovable. Both breached because HackerOne buried critical reports while collecting your bounty fees.

HackerOne is NOT a security partner. They are a liability.

They close real vulnerabilities. They protect their own metrics over your data. They let researchers get attacked while they stay silent.

Stop paying HackerOne to get hacked.

https://t.co/Sb1AoiOG6L

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

Same model family. Different benchmark story.

On @AnthropicAI 's public coding benchmark, Opus 4.7 improves over Opus 4.6.

But on ManifoldMemory’s fixed-evidence Reader Leaderboard:

Claude Opus 4.6: 75.6%
Claude Opus 4.7: 72.6%
Same retrieval contract. Same 500 questions. Same judge. Only the reader changes.

That does not mean “4.6 is better than 4.7.”

It means benchmark choice matters.

A model can improve on coding / agentic workflows and still regress on a tightly controlled evidence-reading task.

This is why I’m separating evidence access from evidence reading.

https://t.co/qEtXgEhUoD

[Fábio Correia @fabiocti]

I released v0 of a frozen-retrieval reader benchmark for LongMemEval-S.

The goal is to separate evidence access from evidence reading.

Instead of letting each system bring its own retrieval stack, I freeze the retrieval layer and expose the exact top-10 evidence chunks used by every reader.

Retrieval substrate:

500 questions
top-10 chunks per question
full chunk text
manifest + SHA-256
R@5 = 481/500 = 96.2%

Then each reader answers from the same evidence block and is judged with the same GPT-4o 5-seed majority protocol.

Current results:

Gemma-4-26B-A4B Hybrid + F3-on-TR: 71.4%
Gemma-4-26B-A4B canonical Hybrid: 70.0%
Qwen3.6-27B Hybrid: 66.2%
Gemma Stack-only: 63.8%
gpt-5-mini same-retrieval reference: 59.0%
Gemma no-retrieval: 53.2%

The interesting thing is not the ranking.

It is the reader gap: even when retrieval places gold evidence in top-5 for 96.2% of questions, readers still differ sharply.

This suggests long-memory evaluation should report evidence access and evidence reading separately.

Leaderboard:
https://t.co/qEtXgEhUoD
Submission substrate:
https://t.co/yVMSApw1uB

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

A friend of mine is looking to publish work on arXiv and is currently seeking sponsorship.

He’s been working on a serious project in AI systems / memory-retrieval research, and I genuinely think it deserves a fair look.

If anyone here is in a position to review it and, if appropriate, sponsor the submission, please reach out. Would really appreciate any help or signal boost.

[Jun Song @jun_song]

gemma4-26b의 완벽한 파인튜닝을 성공했습니다.

- 0/100 refusal 완벽 무검열
- 툴콜/토크나이저 모델 태생 이슈 해결
- 벤치기준 기존 대비 성능 10% 향상
- 출력토큰 속도 10% 향상
- 프롬프트 처리속도 약 90% 향상

완벽한 모델이 완성되었다고 생각합니다.

gguf / mlx 두개 버전 ⬇️

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@sudoingX Was it sponsored? Like, share with them the research afterwards (first dibs)?

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@sflorimm

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@rez0__ @MikeGropp @Hacker0x01 The key is finding the "Above the Baseline" sweet spot. And that means trying something "different".

[BugUnstuck @BugUnstuck]

@h4x0r_dz c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 slacking with only 5.