🚨 트럼프 대통령, 한국 직격! 🇰🇷🇺🇸
“South Korea, who was not helpful to us”
호르무즈 해협 경비 얘기 나오자마자 유럽·한국·일본·중국을 언급하며 “우리가 왜 대신 지키냐”며 불만 폭발.
특히 한국을 콕 찝어서 "미국은 주한미군 4만5천 명을 북한 핵 바로 옆에 두고 있는데도 전혀 도움이 안됬다"고...
이따 10시에 있을 연설까지 갈 필요도 없을 것 같은데요? ㅋㅋ
이게 다 리재명 때문이다!!
🚨A host went on live TV begging ordinary Iranians NOT to leak the hiding locations of regime officials to Israel! He literally cried that if the people expose their coordinates, “it's over” and they will be eliminated.
The Islamic Republic is terrified because they know the ultimate truth: millions of Iranians are acting as the eyes and ears of Israel on the ground.
The Iranian people are actively cooperating to hunt down their oppressors. We are allies in this fight. 🇮🇱🇮🇷
중국을 추종하는 자들은 정말 이것을 원하나요? 👿
중국 선전에서 일자리가 급감하고 주민들이 거리에서 잠을 자며 생계를 이어간다. 경제 쇠퇴와 체제 억압의 현실을 목격하고도 중국과의 무조건적 친밀화나 중국화를 추구하나요?
중국공산당은 국민의 삶보다 권력 통제를 우선시합니다.
Islam's moral ceiling is fixed. It was set 1,400 years ago, by Muhammad and the Qur’an.
You can’t go higher than Muhammad. He’s the limit. The ceiling.
Muhammad married a child, took slaves, ordered executions, waged wars, lied, raped, hated, and stole.
So how can anyone say those things are wrong if the man who did them is still your highest example?
That’s why Islam doesn’t change, not because Muslims don’t want it to, but because they’re not allowed to imagine anything better than what’s already been given.
The West, shaped by centuries of Judeo-Christian moral struggle, leaves space to climb. It admits mistakes. It reforms. It questions. It separates power from holiness.
Islam doesn’t.
That’s why it doesn’t evolve, and why, when it enters a modern society, it doesn’t integrate. It collides.
Because a faith that locks morality in the 7th century can’t live peacefully in a world that keeps growing.
This is one of the most important threads that explains what has been eating at you over the last few years.
Ever since the great Precambrian Woke Explosion of 2020, it no longer mattered what the specific issue was whether it was climate change, BLM, trans rights, ANTIFA, Free Palestine, or feminism. All left-wing activist causes suddenly felt deeply interconnected and totalizing in very weird and strange ways.
If you are a sane person, you'd have asked:
> how come feminists didn't care about the Iranian women subjugated and slaughtered by the Mullahs for wanting more freedom?
> how come UN Women cared more about making sure trans women (men) have access to female prisons than Hamas terrorists raping Israeli women?
> how come Greta "How Dare You" Thunberg smoothly pivoted to campaigning against Israeli "apartheid" while never once mentioning China destroying marine ecosystems with overfishing?
> what the fuck EVEN is Queers for Palestine?
> why the hell was Microsoft doing land acknowledgments before Zoom town halls?
Everything from American corporate life to Hollywood movies to universities became vehicles for the omnicause: a single, all-encompassing moral framework where climate, race, gender, borders, and foreign conflicts are fused. The surface “issue” often became secondary to maintaining ideological purity across the entire bundle.
What was driving this?
I KNEW where it was coming from. Now, @DataRepublican and @AsraNomani have the receipts.
David Horowitz used to say that "the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution."
The revolution here is the overthrow of the ideological architecture of the West and the remaking of the world order.
China's leadership explicitly wants to undermine American confidence of itself and of the US-led World Order because Beijing is a revisionist power that sees the system as designed to keep it subordinate.
And so it amplifies narratives that portray the US-led order as the "root of evil" - imperialist, morally bankrupt, white supremacist, exploitative, and in inevitable decline. The aim is cognitive warfare to erode domestic support for protecting this order which serves to facilitate China's seamless rise.
Neville Roy Singham has funneled at least $278 million through dark-money intermediaries, donor-advised funds, shell companies, and US nonprofits into a vast network of far-left activist groups, media outlets, and political education organizations to push this.
@DataRepublican directly quotes Singham at a 2024 CCP forum in Shanghai:
"If we want to have a new world order based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II."
Read that again.
Understand that Singham sees this WWII narrative as the last major cultural obstacle standing between the current order and the “multipolar” (China-led) future his network is working toward.
And now... notice all those around us who are parroting the same line.
It used to be just the crazy lefties and the NGOs like the UN. Or the globalists like the WEF.
Now you're seeing it on the right.
Beijing wins when a majority in the West treats US hegemony and the post-1945 system as invalid, so that it can replace it with one where it sets the rules and norms.