Seeing the news about @RichardHeartWin
Hope he's okay and that everything is handled fairly. No point speculating until the facts are clear.
PulseChain keeps running, builders keep building, and we'll keep doing our part.
Stay strong โค๏ธ๐๐๐
Rough day for PulseChain.
BullBearSwap runs its own dedicated nodes, so quotes and swaps don't depend on public RPCs.
Every swap is simulated on-chain before you sign.
You can also swap directly through PulseX:
Pick PulseX in the quote list and swap from BBS
Gas fees spiked to 3,000,000 PLS per simple transaction, causing bridge processing to halt and rapidly draining our gas sponsorship funds.
The Piteas API also relies on public RPC endpoints, so fetching quotes and executing swaps failed simultaneously when those RPCs went down.
Weโre currently clearing stuck transactions and working to restore normal operations.
BullBearSwap has integrated @hashflow as its first RFQ liquidity source
Hashflow market makers now compete inside our routes, in the same transaction as the AMMs. On PEPE swaps this week, BullBearSwap beat the top aggregators with Hashflow in the route
More updates coming soon
PulseChain fam, WATCH THIS before your next swap ๐
A quick @BullBearSwap demo: $200 worth of $HEX -> $PRVX (ProveX)
Compare your quotes. Stop settling for fewer coins๐ฅ
Every route. Still verified on-chain ๐ฅ
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333@SwitchDotWin BBS is built around one thing: prove the quote, don't just display it.
We're not here to attack anyone or drag up old drama.
But we have zero tolerance for false claims or misleading comparisons.
If you print "2.40% better", prove it. Simple.
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333@SwitchDotWin Mate, you started by implying our quoted output wasn't executable
That's exactly why we responded
Weve tested every major PulseChain aggregator before listing competitors on BBS. In our testing, Piteas was the only one that consistently proved the quoted output executable
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 LMAO. If your UI claims "2.40% better", users shouldn't need to fork PulseChain to prove your number
You made the claim. You show the proof ๐ฅ
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 If JOLT claims "2.40% better" prove BOTH things:
What is it 2.40% better than and does that exact output execute?
Users shouldn't have to fork the chain to verify your number
BBS proves the benchmark AND the output ๐ฅ
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 Sir, ALM is NOT proof. "Tight concentrated ranges" is NOT proof.
You claim you "full replay every swap"?
Then stop explaining the pool and SHOW THE RECEIPT:
block -> pools -> calldata -> eth_call -> exact executable output
BBS already does this.
Don't tell users it executes
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 Sir, your own post says users should compare at execution time. So explain this:
JOLT routes ~46.5% through SwitchX with only $227K total TVL & a $59K PLS/USDC pool then claims "2.40% better output"
If the quote is real, prove it on-chain!
Labels don't win swaps
#Pulsechain
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 And can that exact amount actually execute on-chain? ๐
Thin liquidity can still produce a good quote
But a displayed quote isn't a receipt
BBS proves the coins before asking you to swap
@joltdotbuild@RealIMMORTAL333 BBS used only 18% SwitchX, searched liquidity across PulseX, 9mm, Phux, LibertySwap + more and proved every one of its 67/67 legs against the venue contracts.
BBS: 12,734.36 โ PROVEN ON-CHAIN
Piteas: 12,721.569
PulseX: 12,697.919
So again:
SwitchX 2.40% better than WHAT?