🚨 #BREAKING: Federal judge rules Flock's camera network violates 4th Amendment rights, accusing the company of building an "indiscriminate mass surveillance" network.
Anthropic: Claude has a soul
Leo: nah
Anthropic: please say Claude has a soul
Leo: nah, here’s a book length explanation why that’s not true
Anthropic: we’re pretty sure Claude has a soul
Leo:
Flock was hacked and its code exposed on September 2nd
We know more than we ever have, not theory, not piecing together info, from the source itself we know how the entire system works.
- Identity tracking.
- Planned camera locations.
- AI assistant.
- How searches work.
- Their access to dark web data only hackers typically use.
- Device types we didn’t even know existed.
- 330k+ device Locations inside schools, jails, watching bathrooms, trails, military bases…all by a private company. (Prior only claiming 150k cameras).
- The ability to search by protected classes such as race, gender, age, disabilities, political affiliation.
- its access to medical records.
Using your phone number, email, plate, description, image, social username, etc will lead an officer to your whole “background workup”.
Proof of Invasion of privacy far beyond what any researcher found prior. This level of investigation required a warrant or RICO case before.
The security researcher released all of these files, the map, planned camera locations, internal files, and much more.
Flocks response? An attempt to get the DOJ to remove the website and hide what they’re doing.
At what point does our government step in and fix this instead of continuing to harass us with our own tax dollars? Our 4th amendment isn’t just being violated. It’s being destroyed.
That map tho WTF police state.
https://t.co/ZlTbat3WO2
🎩 Deflocking America 🇺🇸
a candle body is not volume man what lol. in fact thats the HIGHEST 6m volume ever lmao
how do traders not know the difference between a candle and volume. wow
@notrealxuser@Crypto_Moe84 there was no call my man. the post in question is that he is calling the body of a candle "volume". i simply said that's not volume and the volume of the candle he posted about was actually the highest which was opposite his claim. hes confusing candle body with volume.
@Crypto_Moe84 Not sure if you understand English man. I’m going to stop responding to you because you clearly don’t understand what you’re even talking about. Best wishes