When are you going to realize when the Dumacrat talk they speak in Black Law Dictionary. Listen to how they talk!!!! They hate America????????????/ Do you really not get it????????
🔥Trump Just Exposed the ONE Thing Democrats Have Been Hiding for Years https://t.co/2jTwkUOqyL
Communist NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who just came to this country, chose to become an American, is deciding he is the foremost authority to tell Americans what it means to be American.
He has the AUDACITY, on America's 250th birthday, to call our great nation "an arena of supremacy" — a nation that "persecutes," ruled by "oligarchs."
He sneers that his fellow Americans are "small, weak, unoriginal."
He says “ICE is invading our streets” while he endorses and welcomes an invasion of third-world savages.
Millions dream of the gift he was given.
A man who spends his time burning the most American city to the ground does not deserve to be America, let alone dictate to others what it means to be an America.
A honest question.
How are you doing in NYC? Still happy with Mandumi?
Mamdani BANS Every New Yorker From Using AC's in their Home... THEN N... https://t.co/JDu7riWkSD
Update on my WCAB Case.
I finally got a Mandatory Conference Hearing. August 25, 2026. This is last e-mail to the attorney for the Insurance Company.
Dear Jon,
Just received your letter about the hearing I requested. Thought i'd give your client one more opportunity to make an offer before the hearing in good faith.
You might want to have them ponder this:
The Compromise and Release expressly states:
"The injured employee's signature must be attested by two disinterested persons OR acknowledged before a notary public."
That language is mandatory. It does not say "may" or "preferably." It says the signature must be either:
witnessed by two disinterested witnesses, or
acknowledged before a notary public.
There are no two disinterested witnesses in the agreement. Therefore, the only method of execution relied upon is notarial acknowledgment.
That means the validity of the execution rises and falls on whether the notarization is valid.
The notarization is facially inconsistent.
The agreement was executed:
November 3, 1998
Witness line states
"Witness the execution hereof this 3rd day of November, 1998."
However, the notary acknowledgment states:
"On this 3rd day of October, 1998, before me..."
According to the face of the document:
The agreement was signed November 3.
The notary supposedly acknowledged the signature one month earlier, on October 3. A notary cannot acknowledge a signature that has not yet been executed.
The C&R itself makes notarization a condition of proper execution when there are not two witnesses.
there are no two disinterested witnesses, and
the notary acknowledgment contains a materially inconsistent execution date,
the document was never executed in the manner required by its own terms.
Contract law
The parties drafted the agreement and expressly required that execution be established by one of only two methods:
two disinterested witnesses; or
a valid notarial acknowledgment.
The document contains no two disinterested witnesses.
Therefore, the only method of execution relied upon is the notarial acknowledgment.
The acknowledgment is facially defective because it certifies an acknowledgment on October 3, 1998, while the agreement itself was executed on November 3, 1998.
A notary cannot acknowledge a signature one month before the agreement was executed. Because the mandatory execution provision was not satisfied, the agreement is facially defective, and its execution cannot be established from the face of the document.
This is more than a minor typographical error.
The date on a notarial certificate is one of the essential facts being certified.
The certificate is certifying:
who appeared
before whom
on what date
to acknowledge execution
If the date is incorrect, the certificate no longer reliably certifies that the acknowledgment occurred contemporaneously with execution of the agreement.
Since the C&R relies exclusively upon that acknowledgment in lieu of two witnesses, the defect goes directly to whether the execution requirements were satisfied.
The Compromise and Release is unenforceable on its face because it fails to satisfy its own mandatory execution requirements. The agreement expressly provides that the employee's signature "must be attested by two disinterested persons or acknowledged before a notary public." No two disinterested witnesses signed the agreement. Accordingly, the only method of execution relied upon is notarial acknowledgment. The acknowledgment certifies that the applicant appeared before the notary on October 3, 1998, while the agreement itself was executed on November 3, 1998. A notary cannot acknowledge an execution one month before the document was signed. Because the mandatory notarization is facially defective and there are no witness attestations to satisfy the alternative execution method, the agreement was never executed in the manner required by its own terms and cannot be enforced absent competent evidence curing that defect. The notary's entry does not match the acknowledgment, or other discrepancies in the execution process. Those facts would support the position that this is not simply a harmless clerical error, but a defect affecting the reliability of the acknowledgment itself.
See you at the hearing.
Rick Hollifield
TDS ~ Hate to Love, but they Love to hate him. Best President in my life time. Been alive for ELEVEN of them.
Bro wore THIS to Trader Joe's... 💀🇺🇸 #shorts#funny#viral#usa#politic... https://t.co/Cduk5q5NRk
Not all cops are bad. I have no respect for tyrants. Much respect to Officer Gamulz. Respect is not given it is earned.
He gets pulled over, ends up in the cops car, and things take a turn https://t.co/Eyc809FIx7
Ilham Omar excited that she was able to SCAM $50,000,000 for 15 community-centered projects.
Need to find who is running these community-centered projects.
I bet they're all SOMALI FRAUDSTERS. Let's find that money & see where it was going. More FAKE/GHOST Businesses??????? Likely!!!
🎞️|Citizen Vigilante (2026) - Film released in June 2026, produced in Germany, but its screening was banned in that country, the EU, and other countries. Film directed by Uwe Boll, forces a cruel reflection on the invasion by immigrants happening in Europe and worldwide. It is based on real events, especially the case of violations/gang rape of a 14-year-old girl in Hamburg, Germany, by migrants.
This is still tame - wait for the chains & meat hooks and blood running everywhere. Ask anyone who has seen it with their own eyes in the Middle Eastern countries like Iraq. Never thought I would see it here in the U.S..