Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦

fckthcrpt

[freeonis @freeonis_]

БЄНЗІН ЗА 3 ДНЯ | Gasoline in 3 Days (animation)

[C4H10FO2P ☠️ @markito0171]

🇷🇺#Moscow Panorama

[Volodymyr Tretyak 🇺🇦 @VolodyaTretyak]

Russia today 👌

[Александр Кайдаш @wizardaleks]

🔥Актуальная песня-пророчество о 🇷🇺выборах 20 сентября 2026.‼️
😎НЕ волнуйтесь‼️
👍Это всё по плану 💩эСВэО ‼️

[Paweł Huryn @PawelHuryn]

Claude Code doesn't show you how many tokens you're using for subscriptions. No breakdown by model. No breakdown by project. Just a progress bar that says "63% used."

So I built a local dashboard that reads the files Claude Code already writes to your machine.

Turns out every session, every turn, every token is logged to ~/.claude/projects/ in JSONL files. Input tokens, output tokens, cache reads, cache creation, model name, timestamp.

It's all there. You just can't see it.

My numbers over the last 30 days: 440 sessions. 18,000 turns. $1,588 in API-equivalent costs. On one day, the cache spiked to 700M tokens - visible cache bug, two days in a row.

The dashboard scans those local files, builds a SQLite database, and serves charts on localhost:8080. Filter by model (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku). Filter by time range (7d, 30d, 90d, all time). Cost estimates based on current Anthropic API pricing.

Works retroactively. First run processes your entire Claude Code history.

Install:

git clone https://t.co/BKyUCxi8Cq
cd claude-usage
python3 https://t.co/O3rvjobdvx dashboard

Windows: use python instead of python3.

Zero dependencies. Python standard library only.
Open source, MIT.

Star it. Fork it. Make it your own.

[chimp @chimpp]

When your portfolio hits zero and you have no more money left to lose

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@litecoin Я користуюсь Exodus і Trust wallet, не можу знайти можливість використовувати Mweb для Ltc. Ця технологія настільки приватна і секретна, що популярні гаманці не можуть знайти її?

[POSTHUMAN ∞ DVS @POSTHUMAN_DVS]

We understand why projects leave, and it's not the projects' fault
@cosmoslabs_io is guilty for the exodus of projects from @CosmosEcosystem
Over the course of its first year of existence, speaking on behalf of @cosmos, Cosmos Labs told a ton of projects that we now have social-darwinism, and the strongest will survive, and that other projects will receive no support from Cosmos

Not only is this all nonsense, coz those who unite best will survive, as mutual aid is the most important factor in evolution. And so we see how weak humans, uniting with horses and dogs, have wiped out the strong mammoths from the evolutionary race

The most important point is that Cosmos Labs is not the entire Cosmos

Starting with the fact that Cosmos Labs' Voting Power is definitely less than @CosmostationVD, continuing with the fact that @interchain_io ICF failed to prevent the passage of a proposal about the community's lack of trust in ICF

After this, ICF allocated 20 million from its funds and handed it over to Skip Protocol (which became Cosmos Labs)

This raises two important points:

1) If the community doesn't trust ICF, then why do we trust Cosmos Labs (an ICF protégé)?
Cosmos Labs is the same ICF, just from a different perspective

2) Cosmos Labs' Voting Power is even lower than ICF's, as ICF long ago lost most of its ATOMs, and as a result, they were unable to counter the proposal about ICF's lack of trust. And Cosmos Labs doesn't spend ICF funds on increasing its Voting Power.
That is, Cosmos Labs cannot represent Cosmos' position; it can only speak for itself.

The problem is that other projects believe Cosmos Labs is the "leader of Cosmos," and whatever @0xMagmar says is taken as the position of the entire Cosmos Hub

No one would be against good leaders, but since the ICF declared Cosmos Labs the "leader of Cosmos," ATOM has been 3-4 times smaller

The best thing Cosmos Labs has come up with is convincing institutions to launch private blockchains on the Cosmos SDK. And Cosmos Labs' role in this is to explain to institutions how to use the Cosmos SDK, which is, roughly speaking, created at the expense of ATOM holders (if anyone doesn't understand how this is connected, we can explain it)

And there's nothing wrong with explaining to people how to launch blockchains on the Cosmos SDK. The Validator School @synctems has been doing this for three years...

It's just not clear what benefit this will bring to ATOM holders...

Cosmos Labs will gain fame and recognition, and maybe even get paid. But it won't be Cosmos Hub that gets paid, it will be Cosmos Labs!

Even if Cosmos Hub gets paid, for it to be beneficial for ATOM holders, they'd have to pay a lot, and pay regularly

Currently, a total of 272 million ATOMs are staked:
So, if institutions pay $272 million for an explanation of how to launch a blockchain using the free, open-source Cosmos SDK, each ATOM holder will receive $1 for each ATOM they stake. But it's a one-time payment. And who would pay that kind of money for training that costs $300 per person, especially on a regular basis, is simply impossible to imagine

In addition, hundreds of blockchains have already been launched on the Cosmos SDK, and among them are a ton of successful blockchains: @binance, @cronosapp, @injective, @noble_xyz - but this simply doesn't affect the price of ATOM

And if any bank or payment system launches a blockchain on the Cosmos SDK, it won't affect the price of ATOM.

Basically, the gist of the complaint is this:
- ICF, which the community doesn't trust, declares that Cosmos Labs is now the "leader of Cosmos," and ICF is washing its hands of it.
- Everyone hopes and expects Cosmos Labs (as true leaders) to lead Cosmos to a bright future.
- If ICF was simply cutting budgets, but at least doing something useful, then Cosmos Labs only made things worse: they stopped EVM implementation, froze payments for ISC development, promoted separatism and social Darwinism, thereby triggering a wave of Cosmos project exits, and generally tarnished Cosmos's reputation.

For conspiracy theorists:
Cosmos Labs is @jaekwon project to get everyone to turn away from @cosmoshub and switch to @_atomone 😅

And it would be funny if it weren't so sad...

While communicating with the ICF was nearly impossible - they simply ignored any requests that weren't in their best interests. They didn't take on the role of Cosmos's leaders, simply being "one of the foundations that helps development"

While communicating with Jae Kwon and Atom One is easy, and they're very approachable, which draws attention to Atom One, communicating with Cosmos Labs is a pain

We've yet to meet anyone who said they enjoyed communicating with Cosmos Labs

Everyone I spoke with said that communicating with Cosmos Labs is difficult, that they're aggressive, and that they act arrogant

We can confirm: Cosmos Labs has surprisingly low soft skills. All our attempts to make friendship and develop Cosmos together were met with callous negativity

It feels like these people don't understand friendship, cooperation, or mutual assistance... They're not responsible. It's best not to take their word for it; they don't keep it

What can we take away from this?

1) Stop thinking that Cosmos is crap just because Cosmos Labs claims to be a leader.
Cosmos ≠ Cosmos Labs
If you don't like Cosmos Labs, that doesn't mean Cosmos is crap
And the fact that you don't like Cosmos Labs is a completely natural reaction of a healthy person; you're not alone; almost everyone feels the same way. The only people who won't tell you Cosmos Labs is crap are the people who receive funds directly from Cosmos Labs, and there aren't many of them

2) Stop believing that Cosmos Labs are some kind of leaders who want to make Cosmos Hub better
Cosmos Labs' opinion ≠ Cosmos' opinion.
They don't take any actions in the interests of Cosmos Hub or ATOM holders
They pursue the interests of their small, centralized group, and what they say on behalf of Cosmos is a ridiculous mistake.

3) Stop thinking that Cosmos is unsaveable. Cosmos has every chance of success if we stop believing in the previous two points and take on the development of Cosmos, ignoring the existence of Cosmos Labs.
Or at least delegate this responsibility to those who want to develop Cosmos

This is our vision of how we can resurect Cosmos, and we will be pleased for a feedback:
https://t.co/ry3Xwj3O3Q

[Quinten | 048.eth @QuintenFrancois]

Crypto update

[Litecoin @litecoin]

👁️👁️

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@_atomone Keplr wallet.

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@synthr_io new day - new scum @synthr_io

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@Community_Sui @WaveOnSui @SuiNetwork 0x6839c703c4e24fdc0f98091bb39f242384ee6f94eecea0c164beb9fb68774f93

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@yishayRL @dymension success story after a year of hard work

[Bumbastikus Ł 🇺🇦 @Bumbastikus]

@MeteorWallet @NearTinkerUnion 👀

[Mahojin @MahojinAI]

On Mahojin, you can generate a precise image you want in under 5 seconds!
Try it now at,
⚡ https://t.co/KyaoZwxFJg

[Aria @Aria_Protocol]

Introducing Aria, tokenizing epic, real-world IP so that you can own the iconic.

A $61+ trillion market, IP is one of the world’s biggest asset classes yet to be unlocked for institutional and retail investors at scale.

By seasoned founders @RWAkefeller and @DKostiner.

[World of Dypians @worldofdypians]

We’re excited to kick off the $50,000 $WOD Token Airdrop Campaign with @BinanceWallet, running until February 6!

Complete simple tasks on @BNBCHAIN and join the revolution in blockchain gaming.

Don’t miss out—join now ⤵️
https://t.co/v4lSNVFGw1

[Listapie @Listapiexyz_io]

We’re excited to launch the @Listapiexyz_io x @BinanceWallet airdrop event, featuring a giveaway of 50,000 LTP tokens.🟡

10,000 lucky winners will share a total prize pool of 50,000 LTP. Be sure to complete all the tasks below and meet the eligibility requirements for a chance to win.⬇️

1⃣ Follow Listapie on X:
https://t.co/D6VjzkxxdA

2⃣ Repost the Binance Wallet Airdrop Announcement:
(RT this tweet)

3⃣ Repost the LTP Public Sale Announcement on Magpie's Launchpad:
https://t.co/nvqRXi7vsG

4⃣ Only Keyless Binance Wallet users are eligible.

▫️ Start Date: January 22, 2025, at 12:00 PM UTC
▫️ End Date: January 30, 2025, at 10:00 AM UTC

A total of 50,000 LTP tokens will be distributed to lucky winners and they can claim the rewards after campaign ends.✅

Don't miss this opportunity! Get a chance to receive an LTP airdrop and engage with Listapie.⛵️

Details:🔍
https://t.co/OzDCoy88Dw