@DogeXiaoping I think it's perfectly rational. There are only two responses to a grown man understanding what China is. They either become pro-china because that future is cool and sci-fi. Or they become rabidly anti-China because they see a thousand years of Chinese dominance.
@gonglei89 Genuinely dont know how banks make money on loans here, they spend like a month doing DD and then give us a tiny loan with a 2.7% interest rate. Tfw our startup gets a better rate than the US gov.
@morris_que14 Of course an EU cuck has to stay internally consistent with the "lessons learned" from their "success" in the Ukraine conflict. It would be incredibly bad form to concede that the PLA could probably raw dog Taiwan if it wanted to.
@SpetsnazTK_LTS Tbh the second time was probably out of his hands. The CR hadnt ended yet, the gang of four still had incredible influence, Zhou (the only major supporter of Deng at that point) had just died and Mao was nearly blind and infirm.
The root problem is that people in general are kind of retarded. GPCR was a solution to a specific problem, and at no point did its architect expect it to be the end of history so to speak. But the plebs don't know that... they can't know that or it wouldn't work!
@SweetSummerSN "Maoists" everywhere have never understood Mao, they lack the relevant historical knowledge. If he didn't want Deng in power he could have purged Deng at any point in the 60s, like killing an ant. Letting him take power was the catalyst for ending the GCPR and initiating reform.
@SpetsnazTK_LTS Mao purged him the first time because he was the "arch-rightist" in government. If Mao wanted to push the GCPR agenda he must purge Deng.
@SpetsnazTK_LTS Fair enough, but the point is that Mao should have had Deng shot if he didn't want Deng in power. And he had more than one opportunity to do it. Instead, he designated Hua Guofeng as his successor... which is like throwing a regular guy in the ring with Mike Tyson.
@gonglei89 Yeah I think we're on the same page. My literal only fear is 150+ IQ Tsinghua grads "going into education" who are one-shotting the revert-to-mean children of successful ๅฐ้ๅ้ขๅฎถ. It could happen to my kids, I wouldn't be able to help myself tbh.
@gonglei89 Most parents don't know any better, and generally ambitious parents overestimate the aptitude of their kids. If they have the resources they almost always choose "top" (and suboptimal) teachers.
@hartsea82@SweetSummerSN I was also alluding to Han Wudi who spent his whole life pushing aggressive expansionism. He knew it was time to scale back but he himself cannot be the one to do it. That would be fatally destabilizing; he must groom a successor who believed in the new direction.
This is also why "maoists" need to be eradicated, because they're infected by a dangerous memetic virus with no cure. There *is* a cure but that would require Mao to officially explain how the GCPR was a means to an end and not the end of history. But that would be retarded.
@gonglei89 I experienced this myself after working with foreign QA contractors, and spending weeks training them on a tool. But like our intern from a top school knew exactly what the tool did and how it worked from the introductory sentence. I couldnt grasp the theory of mind for the QA.
@gonglei89 I don't mean you don't pull up the teacher skill level. But like you genuinely shouldn't use Tsinghua PhDs for like average kids. It's like talking to an alien for the kids. But like e.g. you can use lower tier PhDs lmao.
@gonglei89 I think it's good to use PhDs for top students. These kids don't fit the normal IQ curve, it's suboptimal to use a normal teacher. They need to be roughly the same frequency and a stem PhD from a top school is a good enough proxy aptitude test.