Comsiclonic

Researcher, UAP Whistleblower advocate, Evil Capitalist

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

I'm not moving the goalposts by pointing out there's a high likelihood of the thing you're openly pretending is impossible, are you stupid?

I think you invented a way to dismiss a very inconvenient fact, because you're an intellectual coward.

The decades old conspiracy remains possible because there's no conclusive evidence showing it to not exist. You're more than welcome to have your opinion, but it will never be anything more than an opinion.

You said it yourself, you couldn't provide evidence because there isn't any to your claim. Weird for someone who puts "I love evidence" on their twitter header.

You're compensating for something 🤣🤣

You also keep seeming to think I claim there is certainly a program or certainly ET life on earth. I've consistently maintained it's possible, not a fact, because it is. There's a lot more evidence it's possible than there isn't.

If you have to consistently make up shit about what other people say instead of substantiating your argument, your argument must be pretty damn shit, huh?

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@rosscoolgraft "Everyone is stupid and I'm smart"

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

Correct. There is no evidence either way. So, everything must be considered.

And this is not the same as the tooth fairy, because we've literally seen life develop in nature on the planet you're standing on right now.

Most mathematical models of the universe show a very high probability of life in the universe.

Approximately 0 mathematical models show evidence for the tooth fairy. Ridiculous comparison and you know that.

Stop being intellectually lazy. You state things as a matter of fact that you then admit aren't. Use the English language properly if you want to be taken seriously.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@Pattrixdi @GenomicSETI I didn't claim Aliens visited Earth. Never once. I don't need to argue with things you utterly invent me saying to distract from your claim.

Does that make sense to you or do you still not understand?

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

Provide one source of irrefutable evidence for this statement, or pipe down little boy.

"There are no aliens and reverse-engineering of their flying saucers on Earth"

Proof. One word. You didn't say "there's no proof of", you said "there isn't", which is a specific claim.

Evidence, or pipe down.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@NoFollowerSVP @GenomicSETI Congratulations. Are you going to double down on known stupidity? This is your *exact* argument, AND you're pretending it's somehow righteous and scientific of you 😂😂😂

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@DustinGenereux @grok what are 5 examples the left commonly does the same cherry picking the 1% of

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@rosscoolgraft That's your opinion not based in any evidence at all. Of course because if there was, you'd be linking it instead of just saying it, retard.

[𝓩𝓪𝓬𝓱 𝓑𝓻𝓸𝔀𝓷𝓮 @ZachBrowne]

Here are some quotes from Ben Rich, formally CEO of Lockhead Martin Skunkworks, about the tech that's so obviously being hidden from us at this point.

1. “The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home” (source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation)

2. “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity” (source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses)

3. “Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we’ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort” (Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995)

4. “We have some new things. We are not stagnating. What we are doing is updating ourselves, without advertising. There are some new programs, and there are certain things-some of them 20 or 30 years old-that are still break-throughs and appropriate to keep quiet about. Other people don’t have them yet. (source: statement made by Ben Rich to Stuart F. Brown in an interview published in Popular Science October 1994)

5. “I wish I could tell you about the projects we are currently working on. They are both fascinating and fantastic. They call for technologies once only dreamed of by science fiction writers”. (source: AIAA lecture Atlanta, Ga. September 7-9 1988)

Credit - blit_blit99 on reddit.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@ArrA_Infinite @SquirrelFlaff Mental retardation is definitely on the ride @ArrA_Infinite.

Remember when you posted lecturing your followers about how you're open minded, open to debate?

I can't imagine how much you lie in real life if you lie so much here. Pathetic. Get a life.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

Let me explain basic reasoning to you in a way you can comprehend.

"No aliens" and "aliens are unverified" are TWO entirely different claims.

One asserts something doesn't exist. The other acknowledges we haven't conclusively established whether it does.

You cannot logically conclude something is false simply because it hasn't been proven true. In reasoning, this is literally called an argument from ignorance.

Did planets not exist before we discovered them?

You're confusing a lack of proof with proof of absence, while lecturing others about critical thinking. Fucking hilarious, bravo 👏

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

It's so funny how blatantly retarded you people think without realizing it. You say very silly nonsensical things with a straight face.

Aliens = unproven
Unproven ≠ bullshit

In reasoning, you don't get to say something doesn't exist without proof it doesn't exist. You can say there's no evidence to support it, but that doesn't make it untrue or impossible. Unverified is not the same thing as untrue or impossible.

Did the solar system planets not exist until they were documented? Did every planet revolve around the sun until someone realized otherwise?

If we were to go by your hilariously dumb thinking, what would the answer be?

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@DesertDiaries If by chance you did write that on your own, great job! I will give it a read. Credit given where due.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@DesertDiaries Proof it was submitted to DOPSR. I can write a 700 page novel in about 5 minutes with AI assistance. If you were hoping to use this to jerk yourself off, you'll need a bit better.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@dontplay_z If you don't think there are unskilled people, willing AND unwilling, you haven't been around very many people.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@MinuteofZombie Weird because all you're missing is any proof whatsoever it's false. Unverified ≠ false.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

This individual truly believes their ethnicity is their qualification for their opinion.

[Jaron Mays @jaronmays]

As a Black man, I’m not impressed by flying cars. I’d be more impressed if our government pay us our reparations.

That’s my message for Black people today.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

@DesertDiaries You're a moron.

[Comsiclonic @C0smiclonic]

The future will be extremely hard for you.

[DesertThrottleDiaries @DesertDiaries]

It’s my opinion that people like Stratton, Elizondo, Grusch and similar are not behaving in a beneficial way to the strength of the national security of the United States.

Folks in the positions that they held KNOW that Military footage can reveal far more than an unidentified object. It can expose how a sensor detects and tracks targets, the detail it can resolve, the conditions that defeat it, and the point where it loses the track. Associated data can reveal collection locations, operating patterns and how different systems work together.

That information can help an adversary work out how to avoid detection, deceive a sensor or exploit its limitations. A clip that looks inconclusive to the public may still contain useful information for someone who understands the equipment. Several releases can also reveal a pattern that no single clip makes obvious.

Foreign intelligence services can make use of that information regardless of whether the object turns out to be extraordinary, a conventional aircraft or a balloon. The collection capability has value of its own.

Release material that can safely be made public. Redact protected details where that works. Withhold footage where those details cannot be separated from the image. Demanding accountability does not require handing over the capabilities and weaknesses of the systems doing the collecting.

But “it’s a UFO video” is a lousy argument for ignoring the protection of military methods and sensors. Public curiosity does not make those capabilities expendable.