@Desperado_Dave@TempestTheEepy@YayJayBae What's your excuse for it saying loli then? Because loli as a loan word is effectively identical both in English and in Japanese
Pronunciation is almost identical too, and the only alternative spelling for Loli is Rori, which still sounds extremely close with a Japanese accent
@acidicmoose24@MurkyTakoDachi1 And as other people have mentioned, the PROTECT Act has been constitutionally questionable for the entirety of its existence
Not that it matters though. CSAM laws do not cover unrealistic fictional material, and obscenity is a whole different can of worms
@acidicmoose24@MurkyTakoDachi1 First off, "virtual" CSAM is not legally a thing
Second off, this proves nothing. ALL obscene material is illegal regardless of what it depicts. Furthermore, obscenity is a separate law from CSAM laws, and requires court intervention to prove. Nothing is obscene by default
@D4n137@Chaosxx227 You do realise that's still a distribution CRIME, right?
Like, regardless of whether or not the material is actually illegal, if you BELIEVE it's CSEM in any form, and still choose to repost/make it more accessible, even for "context", that is a literal federal crime
@boon5738286@Zect_TV_@LRTEQSSJGoku Because it's not. Obscene Lolicon is, but nothing is Obscene by default, and when an Obscenity charge DOES occur it's a case-by-case basis
@boon5738286@Zect_TV_@LRTEQSSJGoku No, it's a summarisation containing factual information that was found on a .gov law website that also had a link to the general Obscenity statute further down the page
@boon5738286@Zect_TV_@LRTEQSSJGoku I am quite literally the person that gathered both of those screenshots. They both came directly from .gov law websites
🧵 US Obscenity Law 101 🧵
• Obscenity is FEDERALLY illegal.
• ANY material can be classed as obscene.
• ANYTHING that meets all 3 prongs of the Miller Test is legally obscene
• Obscenity requires direct court intervention to prove.
• NOTHING can be obscene by default.