@PRGLN17@Esoterrorist777@MarioNawfal You have a very misguided and misinformed view of the world. There is no acceptable excuse for this behavior and the idea that anyone would accept it if we're ICE is ludicrous. You're delusional
@EricLDaugh Marco is making a very strong argument that he should be considered before Vance. He's performing well and saying the right things to sound relatable. I'm not saying Vance is doing poorly, but many of the wins this go around have been state department wins.
@DefiantLs It's only logical people would make this argument. We've already bastardized the purpose of the Senate with the 17th amendment. By doing that, we made the Senate more like the house that it was intended.
@manteQuilla404@DineshDSouza I believe you're correct. I haven't followed the NBA much since the 90s and after looking it up I think I'm 93 the bills won with Armstrong, Jordan and Pippen.
@FFT1776 It's not legal. The federal government is clearly given authority over naturalization and therefore immigration in Article 1 section 8 paragraph 4. Any law passed by a lower govt counter to federally passed laws on immigration are invalid. This is where the supremacy clause comes
@catturd2 Like it or not, it was the correspondents dinner. The "journalists" that cover politics are going to be invited. There's going to be nutjobs there.
@JackPosobiec I agree it should, but let's be realistic, the people this could sway one way or the other, aren't paying attention and everyone paying attention aren't going to be influenced no matter how damning.