🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Rob Churcher🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Play Golf, Chilworth Club Champion 2014,2023 .....Support Saints(SFC).Wonderful Wife and 2 Boys .... Sometime virtual golf course builder for Trackman

[Restore Britain @RestoreBritain]

This Reform canvasser has been caught on camera saying Rupert Lowe was removed from the party because of racism and Rupert being on 'the extreme right side'.

The bloke can barely string a sentence together in English.

Reform are an embarrassment.

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up right now to go to work and pay their taxes.
Just a quick reminder before you start your daily commute. You are paying the highest taxes in British history to a political establishment that actively despises you.
You are getting up early and working yourself to the bone to fund luxury hotels for illegal migrants, bloated green vanity projects, and a Labour government that is busy plotting how to surrender our borders back to the EU. They are using your hard earned money to fund the managed decline of your own nation. Do not let them normalize this. Have a great day, and retweet if you are absolutely sick of footing the bill! 🇬🇧☕️📉

[🌏Reading Cat @mrrembrandmrs]

Islam is not a spiritual religion; it is a territorial one. Everything is designed to occupy land and subjugate people. When the call to prayer is proclaimed, it is a declaration of control over that space. 

When they pray in the streets, it is to assert dominance over that area. When they buy churches and convert them into mosques, they are claiming the land as theirs. When they convert people, they are asserting ownership over society. 

When they preach, they are signaling their intent to one day rule that country. Islam is not about saving you—it is about enslaving you.

[Matt Le Tissier ✝️ @mattletiss7]

Someone posted this on Facebook...so true!

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for peanuts
Anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
It's time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Airline surcharge tax
Airline Fuel Tax
Airport Maintenance Tax
Building Permit Tax
Cigarette Tax
Cooking Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Death Tax
Driving Permit Tax
Environmental Tax (Fee)
Excise Taxes
Income Tax
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Petrol Tax (too much per litre)
Gross Receipts Tax
Health Tax
Heating Tax
Inheritance Tax
Interest Tax
Lighting Tax
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Mortgage Tax
Pension Tax
Personal Income Tax
Property Tax
Poverty Tax
Real Estate Tax
Retail Sales Tax
Service Charge Tax
Telephone Tax
Value Added Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Water Tax
Tax (VAT) on Tax.
And Now they want a blooming Carbon Tax!

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was one of the most prosperous in the world... We had absolutely no national debt, had a large middle class,a huge manufacturing base, and Mum stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the happened? Could it be the lying parasitic politicians wasting our money?
Oh, and don't forget the relatively new bank charges....
And we all know what we think of Bankers.

I hope this goes around the UK at least 1,000,000,000 times!!!

YOU can help it get there!

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok.

The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet.

And yes… you already know where it leads.

OneLogin.

A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account.

This ban is not the end goal.
It is one verification type.
One tiny draconian token.
One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle.

And the equation remains the same:

OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID.

Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do:

They’ll introduce the gate first.

To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control.

It will be a government check.
A government login.
A government permission slip.

You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.”

This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front.

And once the token exists, it becomes the default.
Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement.

Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash.

Because what they’re building is not an age gate.
It’s a permission gate.
A surveillance gate.

A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled.

They will see what you do.
When you do it.
What you search.
What you access.
What you post.

And people will still be saying, with a straight face:
“Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.”

That’s the bait.

Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?”

And notice what he’s really saying.

He is not empowering parents.

He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted.

The same government that has lied to you for years about safety.

The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection.

The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind.

And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again.

A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring.

Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier:

Henry VIII powers.

Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction.

And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House.

They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State.

The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen.

And it gets worse.

Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends.

So what exactly are you “consulting” on?
A decision that’s already been made.
A system that’s already being implemented.

A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be.

Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children.

They will sell it as “tracking attendance.”
But it isn’t an attendance system.
It is a digital tether.

A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions.

And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous:

A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens.

Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply.

No access.
No platform.
No digital participation.
No “privileges.”
Just compliance.

And here’s the part people are missing:

They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end.

They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it.

They can amend laws at any time.
They can expand definitions at any time.
They can widen the net at any time.

Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges.

The lawmakers and the enforcers.

And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations.

That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.”

This isn’t safeguarding.
It’s centralisation.

And it doesn’t stop there.

The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation.

Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing.

No new “big scary bill.”
No headline.
No national debate.
Just silent regulatory expansion.
A little more coercion.
A little more surveillance.
A little more permissioning.

Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter.

And you’ll be told it’s normal.
You’ll be told it’s safety.
You’ll be told it’s “for the children.”
This consultation is a farce.
The law is being passed.

Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture.

This is not even the start of mission creep.

This is another step.
Another spoke.
Another token.
Another gate.

And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety.

Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number.

There are privacy-preserving options.
There are local-device checks.
There are non-centralised approaches.
But that is not the point.
Because the point is not safety.
The point is control.
This is part of the digital gulag.
The panopticon.

A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key.

Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Non-stun slaughter. Halal/Kosher. What does the British public really think?

I tabled a motion in Parliament pushing for a ban and just seven MPs signed - out of 650. So Restore Britain asked Find Out Now to poll the British people on the following two questions...

The government should require meat sold in shops and restaurants to clearly state how the animal was slaughtered.

A staggering 66% agree.

Just 8% disagree.

This is important. Labelling would essentially bankrupt the industry and act as a ban. Let's push for labelling.

But on an outright ban itself?

A policy almost no MP will touch? I am abused and accused for raising it in Westminster.

55% want a ban. On both halal and kosher.

55%.

Just 12% don't want a ban.

An enormous majority want to ban ALL non-stun slaughter.

Labour won't ban it. Farage has said he wouldn't ban it. Lib Dems obviously wouldn't. Conservatives? Don't know.

The disconnect between politicians and the people is absolutely huge. Quite frankly, they are scared of offended Muslims.

My view? This is Britain. As a farmer, I can say that we care deeply for our animals in this country. We should not put them through brutal and unnecessary suffering.

The campaign to ban halal and kosher slaughter really starts today.

I now know that the majority of the British people are with me.

(Find Out Now surveyed 1,029 GB adults for Restore Britain on 13th January, filtered to be nationally representative by age, gender, region and 2024 GE vote. Find Out Now is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules)

[Restore Britain @RestoreBritain]

The British people overwhelmingly want their meat properly labelled by slaughter method.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Labelling halal meat - this is an objective I believe we can achieve.

Our new polling shows that an enormous 66% of the British public agree with mandatory labelling by slaughter method. Just 8% disagree, largely Muslims. I suspect.

Now. If I were in charge, I'd ban halal/kosher slaughter in a heartbeat. But for now, we have to work on realistic goals and a full ban simply isn't going to happen whilst Labour are in charge, and Farage has said he wouldn't ban it either.

Labelling, however, can. Following pressure, the Government are looking at this.

I believe it is possible.

And considering how much the British people despise halal slaughter, proper labelling would bankrupt the industry and act as a ban.

Mandatory labelling is the way forward.

This is a campaign we can win.

Let's crack on.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Rob Churcher🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @CGXRobC]

@TitleistEurope @CR41G_08

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Rob Churcher🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @CGXRobC]

It’s here. A recap of my #SpotifyWrapped
https://t.co/w5djBxXzAv

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

How to cut the welfare budget? Number one. Ban foreigners from claiming benefits. Number two? If you can work, you must work. If a healthy individual has repeatedly refused a job, then they should be put to work. Don't give them benefits, give them work.

If they want their cash? They can litter pick. Clean up graffiti. Anything. Run council programmes to organise it. Get people working for their benefit money rather than sitting around all day doing sod all.

It's fair to give people a reasonable amount of time to find a job they want to do. But if after months, they keep turning down work? Then no, that's not on.

A life on benefits for a healthy individual must NEVER be an option. If they want to live on taxpayer money, then I say they can work for it.

[Rory Synnott @RorSyns]

Waking up at 5am freezing your balls off to go to work and exert yourself physically everyday to pay extortionate tax to keep illegal immigrants warm in hotels and pay for their clothes and iPhones.

UK Tradesmen.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Rob Churcher🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @CGXRobC]

@TitleistEurope @CR41G_08 @LukeChurcher18

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

What our 'leaders' will never talk about:

In the last week alone, in the UK, in just one week, we've gone from reading about the 27-year-old mother Rhiannon Whyte, stabbed in the head 20 times by an illegal migrant from Sudan, to Wayne Broadhurst, stabbed to death by an illegal from Afghanistan while walking his dog, to a small boat illegal migrant stabbing a stranger to death in a bank in Derby, to a migrant from Afghanistan strangling a railway worker over a minor ticket dispute, to a Syrian illegal migrant sexually assaulting a student in Cardiff, to illegal migrants chasing migrant hotel workers with knives "because they didn't like the food", to 10 people suffering a mass stabbing on a train at the hands of two Black "British" men for no apparent reason.

Why is this happening?

Because our so-called 'leaders' have been importing millions of people from highly violent, conflict-ridden, and, yes, inferior 'honour cultures' from the Third World, where settling grievances through violence is standard

As the academic Garrett Jones points out in his book:

"When a nation imports people, it imports the average cultural traits of those people".

Mass uncontrolled immigration is not just the importing of people; it is the importing of cultures

And the cultures we are importing are not just radically different and incompatible to our own but are visibly inferior, primitive, stuck in cultural codes and practices we moved on from hundreds of years ago

It is, to quote @GadSaad, "suicidal empathy" --our leaders think they are helping these people when in fact they are killing their own society, country and people from within

None of this can be said in Westminster where universal liberalism --"all cultures are equal"--reigns supreme.

This is what you saw on Question Time this week, when I was widely attacked by a liberal ruling class that cares more about helping people from backward cultures than defending its own people

But it's effects can clearly be seen in the extent to which 1st and 2nd generation migrants here in the UK, who we are told are "British", "nice boys from Cardiff", turn out to be highly violent criminals, continuing the cultural traits from their origin countries

Again, nobody in Westminster wants to think about this point about culture

But look:

2025 Manchester synagogue terrorist
Syrian parents

2024 Southport terrorist
Rwandan parents

2021 Liverpool terrorist
Born in Iraq

2021 Sir David Amess terrorist
Parents from Somalia

2020 Reading terrorist
Born in Libya

2020 Streatham terrorist
Parents from Sri Lanka

2019 Usman Khan terrorist
Parents from Pakistan

2017 Manchester MEN terrorist
Libyan parents

2015 Leytonstone terrorist
Born in Somalia

2013 Lee Rigby/Woolwich terrorist
Parents Nigerian

2007 London/Glasgow terrorists
Iraqi/Indian parents

2005 "homegrown" 7/7 terrorists
Shehzad Tanweer, parents from Pakistan
Mohammad Khan, parents from Pakistan
Hasib Hussain, parents from Pakistan
Germaine Lyndsay, born in Jamaica

No other society in the world would tolerate this --would do to its own people what our leaders are doing to us

Could you imagine, say, the United Arab Emirates, Japan, China doing this? Of course not.

Because they are not idiots; they do not tolerate suicidal empathy.

Through mass immigration, porous borders and a total failure to integrate newcomers, our leaders have made us much less safe and put our own people at risk

These migrants do not instantly adopt the host country's 'British' or 'English' culture and identity the moment they sign a few papers

Far from it

They retain central aspects of their origin countries --including religion, belief, attitudes toward violence, hatred of non-believers, and so on

This is what the rape gang scandal was about; we imported clan-based networks from rural Pakistan that think non-believers are fair game and distrust authority

The vast majority of radical Islamists in Britain were either born abroad or trace their roots back on these islands only one generation, while living in 'closed' social networks filled with other people from their origin countries, which reinforce these different cultures

This is then further enabled by an idiotic ruling class and woke left that pursues virtue and social status for itself by proclaiming platitudes like "diversity is a success" while also having to use speech codes --"far right", "racist", and so on--to shut down any dissent

Then it uses multiculturalism to encourage minorities to remain distinctive and separate from the majority, even prioritising them over the majority

It is all completely insane

This is what the UK has now been doing for 30 years, under Labour and the Tories, the Uniparty, importing radically different if not incompatible cultures which then persist across generations

And today this is being compounded by importing 180,000 unvetted illegal migrants into the country in just 7 years, with another 180,000 forecast to arrive by the next general election if the average trend continues

Just think about that --by the next election we will be talking about 400,000 unvetted illegal migrants roaming around the country, many from the same highly violent, conflict-prone societies as the ones that have given us all of the chaos above

And so in the years ahead this chaos will only increase, it will only get worse, because our leaders refuse to see this reality and make changes

In short, every terrorist attack, every stabbing, every rape, every sexual assault, every rape gangs, is a reminder of the fact our leaders, who are supposed to defend us, are importing people who hate who we are and cling to totally different cultures, identities, and outlooks, all of which is making our own culture, identity, and social cohesion harder to maintain

We can either keep ignoring the critical importance of culture or we can do something about it

What would "doing something about it" look like?

Radically reshaping our country and its future around people who have deep roots and ties to this country

Rewarding those who genuinely integrate, removing those who do not

Ending the extreme policy of mass uncontrolled immigration

Doing whatever is necessary to fix our borders --leave ECHR, repeal HRA, detain and deport

End soft-on-crime policies

Launch an all-out assault on radical, violent Islamism

We have a choice. We can do these things or we can keep killing ourselves from within.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Rob Churcher🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @CGXRobC]

@Oliver_foster_ Its only going to get worse !!!!!

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

Welcome to the UK:

On Tuesday, in Uxbridge, west London, a dog-walker was stabbed to death in the street by Afghan.

On Friday, an asylum seeker in Walsall was convicted of murdering a female worker at the migrant hotel in which he was staying.

On Monday, an asylum seeker in Bournemouth was jailed for chasing hotel workers with a knife because he was unhappy with the free food he was being given.

On Wednesday, a small-boat migrant in Derby was jailed for life for stabbing a bank customer to death.

A few weeks ago, a gang of small-boat migrants in Dorset was jailed for committing “roaming street violence” armed with machetes

We shouldn’t have to live like this

—Michael Deacon, Telegraph

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

A flawless three minute summary of the real agenda behind digital ID. 🎯

"Instead of having separate documents like your driver's license, passport... and bank accounts... everything is tied to a centralised profile. It's your new key to life."

"And look, that sounds convenient, but... once that system becomes a single gateway, it connects you to everything that you rely on."

"If your digital ID becomes frozen, then you're effectively locked out of the entire system."

"It'll be tied to your healthcare... your transport... utilities like power and water... supermarkets and retailers where you buy your food... online social media platforms where you post your thoughts."

"So when that personal digital ID is active, life works for you. But when it's paused, flagged or suspended, everything stops."

"If you don't comply with the new vaccine mandate, bang. No flights, no bus, no car... no food."

"Criticise the government online, bang. Your bank account... just got completely locked."

"Question their climate policy, bang. Your power is throttled, your lights go out."

"And this isn't some wild theory. It's already happening over in China... And in this system, no one needs arresting. The system itself enforces compliance. If you step out of line, then you're digitally erased from life."

"So when Starmer or Albanese or any other leader tells you that digital ID is about convenience and safety... it's got nothing to do with that. It's about complete and utter control."

Credit: @2worldsPodcast

[Know Your Human Rights @HumanRights4UK]

🛑Make no mistake, yesterday, for the first time in living memory, a UK Prime Minister actually 'threatened with blackmail' the livelihoods of the British people he's employed to protect. Unbelievable.

We're now living with an 'Authoritarian' Govt.

#StarmerOut
#NoToDigitalID

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

Share

[Chris Littlewood @chrislittlewoo8]

Digital ID for every adult is not progress. It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience.

I am a cyber security specialist. This is my take.

They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration. That is bollocks.

We spend hundreds of billions a year on cyber security and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records. The threat is growing faster than the spend.

Digital ID will not stop boats. It will not stop trafficking gangs. It will not fix a broken border.

Criminals will work around it.

Honest citizens will pay the price.

It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read and who you speak to.

It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life.

One breach and your life is exposed.

Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks. Now imagine that at national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life.

Here is the risk that ministers will not admit.

Ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider:

It lies quiet for months.
It rolls through the backups.
On trigger day the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.

Payments fail. Health and benefits stall. Borders slow. Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid or the state rebuilds from scratch.

Centralise identity and you centralise failure.

Do not fall for the pitch.
Function creep is certain.
It starts as login.

It becomes access to money, travel, speech and public services.

It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors.

It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders and hostile states to target.

It will punish the elderly, the poor and anyone who is not always online.

It will centralise risk and outsource blame.

It will not stop fraud.

It will not stop illegal migration.

It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth.

If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes and remove those with no right to stay.

You do not need a national ID to do any of that.

We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason.

Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status.

Yes to privacy first proofs. No to a database state.