What kind of shitbag do you need to be to support the President literally Trolling & Crashing Out like he's a terminally online weirdo? These posts arent for Iran. They are for his brain damaged dude bros online. They get to laugh & cheer these posts as "winning" while getting fucked over here at home. Its either that, or our fraud-in-chief is actually shitting himself over this mess he's got us in and is having a very Public Meltdown, losing his mind. 🤦♂️
@JoeBerne1 I'm not afraid of the current LLM AI I'm afraid of the future AI models which will be much smarter than say Gemini, GPT, Gronk, etc. which will never be able to replicate or match a human eye of writing. It's just not a threat yet. It is a threat however to author's being seen.
@JoeBerne1 Once we get past AI chat bots I think ALL authors should start to fear I don't think we will get to those advanced AI models for 10 years or so. So for now we're okay. Unless GPT Gemini Gronk etc becomes much smarter
@JoeBerne1 Maybe not with the current AI models but once AI gets smarter I think we as creatives will have a reason to fear. Atm AI can't relicate human lived experience which how books become human. AI is only good at lines like sentences but not at the human element
@Zepp1978 This game I was looking at the comments were accusing even the voice actors of being AI. Its this cyberpunk game I forget it's name. But yeah people are bitching about EVERYTHING being AI 🫠
This is an eating disorder. His career is based on his extreme body dysmorphia, which he markets to vulnerable kids.
It feels like we’ve backslid so far that we’re both rewarding body image issues and mocking them. It’s fascistic; creating hierarchies based on impossible ideal.
The idea is good but the text itself was rushed and not thought through. It violated a lot of standard practices to protect survivors and due process:
1. It also released documents related to allegations found to be false or unsubstantiated, not just verified violations or settlements. So innocent people would get lumped in with violators.
2. To our knowledge, there was zero victim consent or consultation on this text. That is very different than with Epstein, where victims are centered and consulted at every step. Here, victims offered all their statements with the promise of protection and anonymity. The text gave them no way to have a voice in what information of theirs or their accounts they wanted public or keep private. That is important because…
3. Although there was a throwaway line about redacting victim names, I do believe full witness or victim statements would have been released. With the way employment at the House works (offices are small, time periods of staff employment are publicly disclosed, etc) it means that even with names redacted you can definitely track details in witness statements and use that to ID victims without their consent. And there was zero mechanism for victims themselves to assert their privacy.
Originally we were supposed to debate the details of the text over two days but for some reason they rushed the vote so we couldn’t iron out any of these details to get this information properly disclosed in a way that guarantees victim safety.
If the text was clean I think you’d get a lot more support. As a survivor, I know why the vast majority of women never report at all and a lot of those reasons, even if unintentionally or inadvertently, were included here. For me at least, guaranteeing the safety and agency of victims and survivors would get me to a YES.
Conservatives want to demonize mexican immigrants instead of addressing the source of the cartel's money, white American drug addicts. If white american drug addicts got clean, then the cartel would lose the majority of their money. But as always, white supremacy demonizes the symptom, while ignoring the root of the problem.