3TW 🐭🕊🐰🇺🇸🍊

Shitposter and Literally H1tler! 😜

[3TW 🐭🕊🐰🇺🇸🍊 @CHIEF_PRETENDER]

THREAD OF THREADS

[Julian Assange @ImJulianAssange]

Mark Evans Mark Carney s brother in law played a direct oversight role as a member of the Board of Directors of CPP Investments (CPPIB) when the decision was finalized to purchase Brookfield's portfolio of Indian road assets for approximately $1.2 billion

Canada launches The current $50-billion Brookfield–CPP Investments
Further reason to kiss your Canada pension goodbye with Mark Carney and the Fiberals
https://t.co/qKFf7EwYYD

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

JULIAN ASSANGE: "The goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war."

War is a taxation based money laundering racket for the transnational security elite - it matters very little to them whether it's in Ukraine or Afghanistan, the goal is theft of public money.

[Q The Storm Rider @Q_TheStormRider]

🚨"The goal is to extract money from the US and Europe through Ukraine and return it to the hands of a transnational elite (Globalist Agenda 2030)"

"The goal is not to win any war, but to maintain permanent conflicts that feed that power circuit"

"The Objective is an endless war, not a successful war"
____ Julian Assange

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Ex-NSA Technical Director Bill Binney proves that the DNC hack of the Clinton/Podesta emails was NOT a remote hack from Russia, but came from inside the DNC itself, put on a physical CD or data stick, and physically handed to Wikileaks, backing up the story that Seth Rich was indeed the DNC leaker.

This was found through the program used and the metadata, which would round the files up to an even number, leaving a unique physical "trademark" in the file.

The mainstream media narrative called his death a "botched robbery," but was it? He was shot in the back a block from his home, and nothing was taken from him, including his keys, wallet, and phone. This wasn't a robbery, it was a hit.

Leaked emails from the FBI show Mueller and the Clintons being mentioned multiple times, alleging that Robert Mueller hired a hitman for the Clintons, and that Mueller had connections to hitmen, while John Podesta also mentioned in his own email, "making an example out of the leaker whether they had basis for it or not."

Julian Assange hinted at the fact that Rich was most likely the DNC insider, who ended up paying with his life to get crucial information out to the public to expose what was really going on in our government, and the people involved. God bless Seth Rich, and may he rest in peace. He will be remembered as a patriot who loved his country, and hopefully one day is killer will be caught and brought to justice.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

JULIAN ASSANGE HAD NO DIRT ON TRUMP because there simply wasn't any. If he did have any, Assange said he would have published it.

Instead, the beginning of the end started for Hillary and the entire collapse of the Democratic Party.

What Julian Assange did find was that the DNC was conspiring to sabotage the 2016 election with the Russia Collusion Hoax, through Hillary's own Russian connections and a plot by the DNC and intelligence communities.

Assange also found that Hillary, while Secretary of State sold 20% of U.S. uranium processing rights to a Russian company in exchange for large donations to the Clinton Foundation.

The highlight of the DNC email scandal that came from Seth Rich who was fed up with how politics were really being run behind the scenes, were the emails implicating massive amounts of corruption, money laundering, blackmail, and child trafficking, which Seth Rich ended up paying for with his life.

"Allegedly" Seth Rich was robbed and was shot and k*lled, even though his wallet, watch, and phone were not missing. He exposed the Democratic Party and paid with his life. This is where the alleged "Russian Hacking of the DNC" started from.

This ties into the Podesta emails, Huma, Anthony Weiner, Obama, the Russia Collusion Hoax, the Clinton Foundation, Haiti, child trafficking, Pizzagate, the beginning of it all, even leading up to the 2020 election and beyond.

It all started with Seth Rich leaking the emails to Assange that exposed everything and got the wheels turning. It was so important, after Seth Rich was murd*red, Hillary wanted to have Julian Assange assassinated with a drone strike.

This is how much this one incident and leaking of intel damaged and exposed the DNC and the Clintons forever.

They got caught and we have it all. It's only a matter of time.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

The CIA along with Hillary Clinton were desperately trying to silence Julian Assange and smother Wikileaks for exposing all of their ruthless operations and crimes, especially about Hillary Clinton, Podesta, Obama, and many others.

Hillary Clinton allegedly asked, "Can't We Just drone This Guy?"

Not only was Assange himself targeted, but the CIA also targeted and harassed his wife, and was even trying to gather a DNA sample from his infant child's "nappy."

They will do whatever it takes to get their way or to silence the ones exposing the truth, and the mainstream media is just another extension of that process.

If they spied on Trump, set him up with a fabricated narrative about Russia, silenced whistleblowers like Seth Rich, attempted to assassinate Trump, tried to bankrupt him, went after Assange, and countless others, what makes you think they wouldn't steal an election if their grip on power and control was at risk?

[Bridgett Fertig @LightOnLiberty]

DNC staffer Seth Rich was MURDERED because he LEAKED Hillary Clinton and John Podesta’s emails to Julian Assange's WikiLeaks that laid out their plot to rig the 2016 election.

The DNC — Clinton emails that Seth leaked to Julian Assange also helped confirm online research that Washington DC was being blackmailed and run by a MASSIVE pedophile ring with many of them linked directly to satanic worship activity and that Pizzagate was real.

Seth Rich ended up murdered after leaking all those emails to Julian Assange and the government waged a witch hunt to capture Assange out of fear of what else was in his possession.

The democrat party is led by satan worshipping pedophiles and they'll murder anyone that gets in their way to keep the evidence from getting out to the public.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Hillary Clinton: "Can't we just drone this guy?"

The CIA literally drew up plans to kidnap & assassinate Julian Assange because he told the truth and dropped the Clinton-Podesta emails and much more.

A CIA asset was also permanently assigned to track his wife and to collect DNA off of his 6 month-old son's "nappy."

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

They already proved they can lock a publisher in a cell for years for showing the public what governments did in our name.

Now they’re quietly replacing paper archives with digital ones that can vanish overnight. No fire. No shredder. Just “page not found.” History rewritten. Sources unprotected. The record of power made editable by whoever holds the servers.

Julian Assange spent 14 years paying the price so the rest of us would still have a chance to see the original files. He’s free. The principle is not.

If we treat this as old news, the next leak doesn’t get published. It gets deleted before it ever exists.

Support the people who refuse to let the past become software.

[Natalie Winters @nataliegwinters]

REVEALED: A think tank co-founded by Facebook’s founding president wants an entirely NEW visa category to repopulate struggling American communities with foreign workers.

It’s called the HEARTLAND VISA.

They’ve already mapped roughly 1,700 potentially eligible counties—home to 58 MILLION Americans.

The Economic Innovation Group, co-founded by Sean Parker, wants at least 100,000 visas a year.

The pitch is explicit:

“In exchange for living in a Heartland Visa community, workers with sufficient earnings will gain permanent residency”

American communities become the destination. Green cards become the incentive.

The proposal targets places struggling with population decline, including rural communities and former industrial centers.

Foreign workers would have to live in a participating area—but could work for an employer located elsewhere.

The think tank also proposes replacing labor certification with an earnings test for the green-card pathway. That would remove the usual labor-market test from this proposed route to permanent residency.

The idea has already reached Capitol Hill.

Republican Senator Todd Young and then-Senator Joe Manchin introduced a version in December 2024. Supporters included AOL co-founder Steve Case, Americans for Prosperity and the Niskanen Center.

County officials would decide whether their communities participate.

EIG continued lobbying for the proposal in 2026.

This is an organized push to turn population decline into a justification for a new immigration program.

[Natalie Winters @nataliegwinters]

Soros-funded activists are now disguising voters mail as wedding invitations…

[Chester Tam @chestermtam]

Gov. Healey just announced nearly $45 million for housing and economic development projects across 31 communities in Southeastern Massachusetts — New Bedford, Fall River, Brockton, and the rest of the region included.

Funny how that works. Southeastern Mass, especially Bristol County, hasn’t exactly been the center of her attention for most of the term. Now it’s a month out from the election and the checks are showing up, along with the visits.

Housing’s a mess. Nobody’s arguing that. The timing is obvious.

[aussie17 @_aussie17]

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥
Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury.

This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely.

I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience.

Here's the first hour of the testimony.

----------------------------------
My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy.

In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil.

In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity.

...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves.

And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant.

Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine.

In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice.

One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine.

The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications.
I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case.

A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo.

These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine.

On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment.

Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests.

And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public.

I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine.

The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest.

Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open.

A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines.

Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years.

Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated.

The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry.

At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues.

Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine.

For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated.

Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption.

To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC".

This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid.

One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard.

The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website.

The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800.

Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800.

In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place.

In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines.

From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine.

This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry.

For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated.

Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved.

I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines.

I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health.

Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture.

Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits.

I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is.

Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.

I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence.

The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step.
----------------------
@DrAseemMalhotra
H/T: @TiinaKeskimki

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

They rushed the body so fast there was nothing left to test. 💔

James Freeland’s mother was 60. Type 2 diabetes. He says nothing else was wrong with her. Two days after the second COVID shot she was gone.

He asked for an autopsy. Refused. Ashes in his hands in under 24 hours, in the middle of a pandemic.

That is not “closure.” That is a door slammed.

His words:

“She called me right when she got the shot… She said, ‘Jabe, I’m not feeling good. I don’t feel good at all… My heart’s racing. I have so much anxiety. I’m sweating like crazy. I’m nauseous.’

“I said, well, do you tell the nurse? Are you telling the nurse? She says, yeah, she says it’s normal.”

“They’re working on my mom in the ambulance… I’m not only just a health and safety guy, I was a rescuer for 17 years. So I know exactly what that means… My mom’s dead.”

“I asked what she had passed from. He said a hard hit to the heart… I said, ‘What’s going to be on the death certificate?’ And he said, ‘Son, it’s a hard hit to the heart.’ And he started walking away from me.”

“She was 60 years old, type two diabetes, nothing else wrong with her and died two days after the shot. You tell me what’s wrong with her.”

“I asked for an autopsy and he refused and he said that they will not do an autopsy unless law enforcement or suspicious circumstances.”

“I had my mom’s ashes in my hands in less than 24 hours during the height of pandemic.”
If it was nothing, they could have waited one day and opened her.

[Steven Peltier @sapeltier]

Massachusetts wants to check on newborns as soon as parents get home from the hospital.

Maura Healey needs to resign and get on her meds, or maybe off them. I don’t understand any fool who supports the Democratic Party. Their platform is abortion anytime you want, and now they think euthanasia for the sick and elderly should be an option if the government decides. They want to let anyone who shows up at our borders into the country, unvetted and unvaccinated. They also want to stifle innovation and free enterprise and dole out what they think we all need.

[Blue Collar Dad @BlueCollarDad73]

@realDailyWire Democrats care the Party of pedophiles.

[Daily Wire @realDailyWire]

The Left has a sick obsession with your child. MN is now forcing their ideological abuse on kids who are too young to understand the differences between genders. Kids think monsters are under their bed, but they are in their government instead.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

“The head of infectious disease medicine at my hospital privately told me that he was working with the state government to restrict the civil rights of unvaccinated people.” - James P. Miller, MD

[PA VOTER (Marla) @PAKAG2020]

Pennsylvanians elected a Republican Attorney General.

Shapiro has bypassed him — again.

He joined the Democrat lawsuit against Trump’s public charge rule — as Governor, not through our elected Attorney General, Dave Sunday.

The rule Shapiro and the Democrats oppose lets immigration officers weigh whether a green-card applicant is already on Medicaid, SNAP, or housing aid.

Illegal immigration already costs PA taxpayers an estimated $1.6 billion a year. Shapiro’s move is to weaken the self-sufficiency test for people seeking to stay legally, placing more burden on Pennsylvania taxpayers.

That’s “GSD”?

For whom?

He’s showing us whose side he’s on. It isn’t the side of hardworking Pennsylvanians.

[Richard @ricwe123]

That moment when Victoria Nuland, in 2016, was bragging to the US Congress about how thoroughly Washington had taken over Ukraine after the 2014 coup.

She spelled it all out without shame:

🔴US operatives embedded in a dozen Ukrainian ministries.

🔴American-trained cops patrolling 18 cities.

🔴The US Treasury gutting 60 Ukrainian banks while sparing depositors to keep people quiet.

🔴Hundreds of millions of dollars funneled into molding Ukraine’s military.

Let's be real,this wasn’t "assistance", it was a takeover dressed up as aid.

"Unprovoked"
😂😂😂