Investigating concentrated power over digital infrastructure & AI in order to promote the free flow of information (@knightfdn support w/in @OpenMarkets)
Excellent: @SenatorLujan warns Brendan Carr to prepare to answer questions about "the nonsense and the cover-ups that have been taking place" at the FCC.
https://t.co/OI43giueKX
Google decides what search results you see. Amazon shapes what products you find.
AI agents go further, deciding what you buy, read, and do.
Whoever controls these agents will wield extraordinary power. Our new report explains what's at stake.
https://t.co/m6R63J9NOY
Google's message to schools: Accept our AI or lose access to Search.
This is textbook abuse of monopoly power: leveraging control over an essential gateway to information to force adoption of another product.
https://t.co/pVTZwJfabv
Reporting isn't free. If AI companies can take the work & divert the revenue that supports it, the public will ultimately pay the price through less independent journalism & less accountability. - @courtneyr
We worked with our @openmarkets colleagues to file an amicus brief informing a critically important case for the future of copyright enforcement in AI.
Find it here: https://t.co/GFoUAOdoPG
We worked with our @openmarkets colleagues to file an amicus brief informing a critically important case for the future of copyright enforcement in AI.
Find it here: https://t.co/GFoUAOdoPG
NEW - A French appeals court ruling reinforces a fundamental principle:
Dominant platforms must not be allowed to unilaterally determine what journalism is worth or how it can be used.
Learn more: https://t.co/puV4WZJ5CH
NOW - Be sure to tune in and hear from top experts, including our director @courtneyr, on how we can bring much-needed accountability & enforcement to AI.
About to kick off @AllTechIsHuman’s Responsible Tech Summit moderating the first panel on AI benchmarking, evaluation and enforcement amid the frontier pacing debate with @mathbabedotorg@ChowdhuryRumman & @AlexBores. Watch the livestream starting at 11
https://t.co/eY44cfMBiT
EXCLUSIVE: In less than 12 hours, a group of ex-DOGE cyber researchers were able to penetrate Anthropic’s systems using AI agents — including Slack channels where the most sensitive models are discussed.
This is just weeks after
Anthropic whistleblower Joseph Coxon charged the company w/launching “a hubristic gamble” from a “private company’s Slack.”
Read our story here (gift link):
https://t.co/x6F8Dg6SLR
Meta has built a trillion-dollar business using willfully unfair, anticompetitive, deceptive, and unconscionable practices. The unilateral change to its use of business website content buried in its TOS is but the latest example. https://t.co/ZhDpKQEohW
Voters who Googled how to donate to Talarico got an AI answer that led them to give to someone else.
A network of fake news sites seeded messaging about state and local candidates that AI answers picked up on.
My story on how the AI midterms are going: https://t.co/tIRBpd7d70
Starlink has become critical military infrastructure. But it remains under the control of Elon Musk, a billionaire who can decide who gets access and on what terms.
That's far too much power for one private company (& CEO) to wield.
New from @MaxvonThun: https://t.co/dDcNK2UlNf
Meta is essentially saying they will control not only their own users' IP to make and maintain AI products, but also any IP a Meta user "makes available."
This should raise alarm to all regulators about Big Tech's abuse-of-dominance tactics using AI development as a pretext.
Meta should back down on implementing any unilateral changes that undercut publisher & user controls over how their intellectual property is used for AI commercial products...
If you're a business or artist with intellectual property, watch the clock.
10 days until Meta claims the right to scrape your website to develop its AI. Your consent? Apparently unnecessary. All it takes is someone sharing a link on Facebook or Instagram - or you using Meta's services.
Meta is essentially saying they will control not only their own users' IP to make and maintain AI products, but also any IP a Meta user "makes available."
This should raise alarm to all regulators about Big Tech's abuse-of-dominance tactics using AI development as a pretext.
Should the world's biggest AI companies get to write their own safety rules?
@danielahanley & Arnav Rao argue instead for open safety standards, independent oversight, & no special antitrust exemptions. @monthly
https://t.co/FHb6cAT5NE
Google controls a critical part of how journalism reaches the public.
It has hampered independent media and democratic debate.
@BarryLynn@techpolicypress on why breaking Google's monopoly is about much more than competition:
https://t.co/506yEeOhOa
The courts had an opportunity to restore competition and curb one of the world's most powerful monopolies.
Instead, they left Google's empire intact.
@BarryLynn calls the remedies decisions acts of “cowardice." @techpolicypress
https://t.co/3oy74gDYiy