sage 🫀

an otherwise normal "girl"

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

@PopBase I don't even go here but I understand the significance of this

[emilia @probmold]

this is how i Died in a past life #soup

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

@hurtinqfangs

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

@gunk4188

[julian 4000 @YEAROFTHEWIZARD]

spinning a basketball on top of my eyeball and screaming

[kat 🪼 @leonkennedyfish]

how it feels having gaps in your memory

[Dr. Abdul El-Sayed @AbdulElSayed]

I’m Abdul_ElSayed and I’m fighting for emeralds out of politics, emeralds in your inventory, and golden apples for all

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

Wow this might be the worst thing I've ever read

[Jack @jackcoder0]

Spotify just announced a feature that could either save the music industry or destroy it.

Starting as early as Q1 2027, Spotify Premium subscribers will be able to use AI to transform any participating artist’s song into a completely different version. Turn a folk ballad into a dance track. Make a hip-hop song sound acoustic. Generate a cover where one artist’s voice performs another artist’s song. Remix a pop hit into lo-fi study music. Create the version of your favorite song that only existed in your head until now.

The remixes will be uploaded directly to Spotify. They’ll appear in playlists. They’ll count toward the original song’s chart position. And most importantly the original artist will earn royalties every time someone listens to a fan-created remix of their work.

Spotify has already signed a landmark licensing deal with Universal Music Group the world’s largest record label. Negotiations with Sony Music and Warner Music are ongoing. The feature will cost an additional $4–$5/month on top of Spotify Premium. And analysts project 7–8% of American subscribers will adopt it by 2028.

This is not Suno or Udio generating music from text prompts. This is fans remixing real songs by real artists with the artists’ permission, on the world’s largest streaming platform, with royalties flowing back to the creators.

A music industry analyst who’s covered streaming economics for 15 years told her team something after reading the licensing agreement that reframed how she understood the future of recorded music.

“Spotify just turned 640 million listeners into 640 million potential remixers. The question isn’t whether people will use it they will. The question is whether paying artists for fan remixes solves the economics of streaming or creates a world where the original recording is worth less than the infinite remixes generated from it.”

Here’s what Spotify’s AI remix feature actually is, who wins, who loses, and why this might be the most consequential decision in the music industry since the launch of streaming itself 🧵

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

pt. 2

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

ocd moodboard but it's just my old tweets

[Siel shady facts @shuakeful]

whenever i have to do anything im like bruh

[char @brooklynbroke]

social anxiety moodboard

[kaitlyn:) @knyyyltiak]

ive spent the last 2 years with this heavy feeling of hopelessness that the average american was okay with this. i feel a lot lighter tonight

[halsey @halsey]

everything is blue.

[mel @rusamejoshi]

squirrels on edtwt: it’s No Nut November

[𝕯𝖞𝖑𝖆𝖓™ @Dylanszn01]

It should be illegal to list an app as free in the App Store if it immediately forces you to purchase a subscription to interact with it.

[Jason, ex Inferis @benedictsred]

Must be so embarrassing when you get struck by lightning and everyone can see your skeleton

[sage 🫀 @CYBERSIG1LS]

why are they called jack o lanterns. Why is the pumpkin jack

[alyssa @spacedglam]

Honestly I really don’t care if you need to explain your Halloween costume but it has to at least LOOK like a costume. Your reference photo can’t be a paparazzi pic of Lana Del Rey leaving LAX in 2015

[Grey @morally___grey]

when you were hoping for an analysis type video essay but it’s a summary type video essay